Cervical Cancer Vaccine

[hagbard_celine]

There's now a vaccination against the virus that supposed to cause cervical cancer, a major killer of women in the Western world. In the papers the other day they said that the govt wants to inject all schoolgirls at the age of 12 or 13. My own daughter is that age. I'm currently dead against it. I distrust vaccines in general and refused to allow the doctor to give her a flu jab. This is a new vaccine too and the full scale of its side-effects are probably unknown.

Does anyone else have any information on this?

[i am all i am]

I LOVE YOU.

G'day Hagbard Celine.

I actually got this for someone yesterday morning. Great timing huh.

THANK YOU.



http://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/3/3D_emoticon_S34.gif With LOVE http://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/3/3D_emoticon_S36.gif


http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/sep/07092004.html

Deaths Associated with HPV Vaccine Start Rolling In, Over 3500 Adverse Affects Reported
By John-Henry Westen

TORONTO, September 20, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - As Canada, in large part due to aggressive behind the scenes lobbying, rolls out the not-comprehensively-tested Merck HPV vaccine for girls as young as nine, a look at developments on the vaccine south of the border should cause Canadians serious concern. In the United States a similar lobby campaign by the same company launched the mass HPV vaccination of girls beginning in June last year.

In just little over a year, the HPV vaccine has been associated with at least five deaths, not to mention thousands of reports of adverse effects, hundreds deemed serious, and many that required hospitalization.

Judicial Watch, a U.S. government watchdog, became concerned while noting large donations to key politicians originating from Merck. A freedom of information request from the group in May of this year discovered that during the period from June 8, 2006 - when the vaccines received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) - to May 2007 there were 1,637 reports of adverse reactions to the HPV vaccine reported to the FDA.

Three deaths were related to the vaccine, including one of a 12-year-old. One physician's assistant reported that a female patient "died of a blood clot three hours after getting the Gardasil vaccine." Two other reports, on girls 12 and 19, reported deaths relating to heart problems and/or blood clotting.

As of May 11, 2007, the 1,637 adverse vaccination reactions reported to the FDA via the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) included 371 serious reactions. Of the 42 women who received the vaccine while pregnant, 18 experienced side effects ranging from spontaneous abortion to fetal abnormities.

Side effects published by Merck & Co. warn the public about potential pain, fever, nausea, dizziness and itching after receiving the vaccine. Indeed, 77% of the adverse reactions reported are typical side effects to vaccinations. But other more serious side effects reported include paralysis, Bells Palsy, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, and seizures.

Judicial Watch informed LifeSiteNews.com that a subsequent request for information on adverse reactions to the HPV vaccine, covering the period from May 2007 to September 2007, found that an additional 1800 adverse reactions have been reported, including more deaths. Exactly how many more deaths occurred will be released in the coming days, Judicial Watch's Dee Grothe informed LifeSiteNews.com.

The LifeSiteNews.com report on the moneyed lobbying efforts of Merck in the U.S. was reported in February. (see http://www.lifesite.net/ldn/2007/feb/07020204.html )

However the Canadian lobby effort by Merck's Canadian affiliate Merck Frosst Canada has been underway using powerful lobbyists with close connections to the politicians who have signed off on massive government funded vaccination programs.

The Toronto Star recently reported that Merck Frosst Canada Ltd hired public relations giant Hill & Knowlton to push the immunization strategies using some well-connected lobbyists: Ken Boessenkool, a former senior policy adviser to Prime Minister Stephen Harper; Bob Lopinski, formerly with Premier Dalton McGuinty's office; and Jason Grier, former chief of staff to Health Minister George Smitherman.

Harper's Conservative Government approved Merck's HPV vaccine Gardasil in July and later announced a $300 million program to give the vaccine to girls from ages 9-13. That of course is only the beginning of what Merck likely hopes will be a much larger vaccination of all potentially sexually active women in Canada who are not already HPV infected. In August, McGuinty's Ontario Liberals, on the advice of his Health Minister George Smitherman, announced that all Grade 8 girls will have free access to Gardasil.

One of the major complaints by physicians is that the HPV vaccination program has been implemented before adequate testing has been completed. Long-term effects of the vaccine remain unknown. Many are asking why the seemingly reckless rush?

At least one answer to that question comes from the fact that Merck currently is the sole provider of an HPV vaccine with its Gardasil product. A competing HPV vaccine, Glaxo Smith Kline's Cervarix, is set to hit the market in January 2008. As more children are vaccinated with Gardasil, fewer will be able to later receive the necessary repeat boosters of a competing, incompatible vaccine. Merck is in a race to capture as much of the market as it can, consuming many millions of taxpayer dollars.

U.S. sales of Gardasil are expected to reach $1 billion in the first year of its availability.
Read Previous LifeSiteNews.com coverage:
The reports from the FDA Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System detailing the three previous deaths are available here:
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007_docs/GardasilVAERSDeath...

The reports detailing all 1637 adverse effects are here:
http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2007_docs/GardasilVAERSRepor...

__________________________________________________ _______________


US Death Toll Associated with HPV Vaccine Jumps to 11 with 3779 Adverse Reactions Reported
Judicial Watch files lawsuit against FDA for its failure to fully respond to Freedom of Information request
By John-Henry Westen

WASHINGTON, DC, October 5, 2007 (LifeSiteNews.com) - Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, yesterday released new documents obtained from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) under the provisions of the Freedom of Information Act, detailing a total of as many as eleven deaths related to Merck's HPV vaccine Gardasil. Those deaths resulted between June 8, 2006 - when the vaccine received approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) - and August 2007 when the latest data was available.

The adverse reports coming from the HPV vaccine are increasing daily at an alarming rate. A LifeSiteNews.com report which scanned a publicly available database of adverse affects coming from the HPV vaccine found 3,137 adverse effects reported on September 28, 2007. Today the U.S. Government's Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) lists 3,779 adverse effects. 52 of the cases were deemed "life threatening" and 119 required hospitalization.

In one case highlighted by Judicial Watch a 17 year old girl who was vaccinated in June 2007 died the very day she was vaccinated. According to the report, she "was vaccinated with a first dose of Gardasil…During the evening of the same day, the patient was found unconscious (lifeless) by the mother. Resuscitation was performed by the emergency physician but was unsuccessful. The patient subsequently died."

Other serious reported side effects associated with Gardasil include paralysis, Bells Palsy, Guillain-Barre Syndrome, and seizures. Says one report: "Initial and follow-up information has been received from a physician concerning an "otherwise healthy" 13 year old female who was vaccinated with her first and second doses of Gardasil. Subsequently, the patient experienced…paralysis from the chest down, lesions of the optic nerve…At the time of the report, the patient had not recovered."

"In light of this information, it is disturbing that state and local governments might mandate in any way this vaccine for young girls," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. "These adverse reaction reports suggest the vaccine not only causes serious side effects, but might even be fatal."

The toll from the HPV vaccine may be greater still. Judicial Watch filed its request on August 20, 2007, and received the adverse event reports from the FDA on September 13, 2007, in what the agency described as a "partial response." On October 3, 2007, Judicial Watch filed a new lawsuit against the FDA for its failure to fully respond to Judicial Watch's FOIA request as required by law.

See the death reports obtained by Judicial Watch:
http://www.judicialwatch.org/archive/2007/GardasilVAERSUpdat...

[hagbard_celine]

Thanks, I am. :):) I love you too!:cool:

This is very interesting. My instincts were correct. There's no way anyone's going to give my girl this vaccine.

[spacegurl]

Have you actually read the stuff you posted, I Am ALL I AM? Four of the links on your post are all dead.

To Celine, you need to look at different sides of the coin and not make rash judgements. I wonder if you studied IAMALLIAM's post or just scan-read it and found words that conjured up 'conspiracy'? You need to be objective when you read articles in newspapers. They're designed to scare people and it works.
Have a look at this:
http://www.cancerhelp.org.uk/help/default.asp?page=16024

[mcmenek1]

Hi hagbard_celine,

Don't let your daughter have the Vaccine...... I started a thread about this a while back :

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=5175

Love
&
Peace

[i_am]

A couple more threads

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4039

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4033

[remorse]

I've been looking everywhere for proper information about the cervical cancer vaccine.

My girlfriend wants to get it but I've been trying to explain to her to wait untill more information is out about it. I highly distrust vaccines and immunizations but its tough to explain to people when you dont have the documents to back you up.

At least with these links i can research it a bit more.

thanks ^_^

[i am all i am]

Have you actually read the stuff you posted, I Am ALL I AM? Four of the links on your post are all dead.

To Celine, you need to look at different sides of the coin and not make rash judgements. I wonder if you studied IAMALLIAM's post or just scan-read it and found words that conjured up 'conspiracy'? You need to be objective when you read articles in newspapers. They're designed to scare people and it works.
Have a look at this:
http://www.cancerhelp.org.uk/help/default.asp?page=16024

I LOVE YOU.

G'day Spacegurl.

The links work for me, and yes I have read the articles. Did you ???

It isn't from a newspaper, so you probably didn't read it at all. It also quotes figures from Judicial Watch.

Maybe you could do some research about vaccines before you support them. Here's a thread that can help you out with plenty of information on it for you.....

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10663&highlight=vaccines

THANK YOU.



http://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/3/3D_emoticon_S34.gif With LOVE http://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/3/3D_emoticon_S36.gif

[i am all i am]

Thanks, I am. :):) I love you too!:cool:

This is very interesting. My instincts were correct. There's no way anyone's going to give my girl this vaccine.

I LOVE YOU.

G'day Hagbard Celine.

You are welcome mate. I am glad that you are only concerned with your daughters well being, it shows a loving nature and a willingness to stick up for someone that you love against those that would harm her. Well done mate, you are a true example for others !!!

THANK YOU.



http://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/3/3D_emoticon_S34.gif With LOVE http://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/3/3D_emoticon_S36.gif

[spacegurl]

I LOVE YOU.

G'day Spacegurl.

The links work for me, and yes I have read the articles. Did you ???

It isn't from a newspaper, so you probably didn't read it at all. It also quotes figures from Judicial Watch.

Maybe you could do some research about vaccines before you support them. Here's a thread that can help you out with plenty of information on it for you.....

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=10663&highlight=vaccines

THANK YOU.



http://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/3/3D_emoticon_S34.gif With LOVE http://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/3/3D_emoticon_S36.gif

No the links do not work.




Sorry, the page you requested could not be located.


That was what keeps appearing on four of those links. LifeSite News website is materialistic and wants money from readers, and also is a fundementalist christian site against things like science research, abortion, freedom of choice and so on. They even have a page dedicated to Harry Potter being "works of the devil".

Yes I have researched vaccines and there is no evidence they kill people. The thread you recommend I read isn't evidence but people's paranoia and a lot of videos from YouTube or conspiracy theory stuff. I posted an article just earlier on from a medical and scientific exam, which you like to ignore. My comment about newspapers was directed at Celine, not you. Pay attention to other people's posts next time. Also cut out the annoying "I love you" crap because this certainly isn't true and it doesn't make you better than other people.

To Hagbard Celine, do you really want to take the advice from Bible Bashers or do you prefer to listen to actual scientific data? Your daughter's life and health is basically in your hands, although bare in mind that cervical cancer isn't widespread or contagious so I don't think she'll be at risk if she doesn't take the vaccine.

[i am all i am]

No the links do not work.

That was what keeps appearing on four of those links. LifeSite News website is materialistic and wants money from readers, and also is a fundementalist christian site against things like science research, abortion, freedom of choice and so on. They even have a page dedicated to Harry Potter being "works of the devil".

Yes I have researched vaccines and there is no evidence they kill people. The thread you recommend I read isn't evidence but people's paranoia and a lot of videos from YouTube or conspiracy theory stuff. I posted an article just earlier on from a medical and scientific exam, which you like to ignore. My comment about newspapers was directed at Celine, not you. Pay attention to other people's posts next time. Also cut out the annoying "I love you" crap because this certainly isn't true and it doesn't make you better than other people.

I LOVE YOU.

G'day Spacegurl.

Maybe the links do not work for you, but they do for me and no other person has said that they didn't work. So maybe it's just you that has the problem.

Actually there is plenty of evidence. For instance, since 1972 in Australia, the only deaths caused by the measles, each and every person that died had been vaccinated. Yes, that's right, there are no non-vaccinated deaths for over 35 years.

Did you watch the videos that I posted links for ???

The first group of links is by a doctor that uses Government reports to show the dangers of vaccines, explains how the anit-bodies do not fight the virus, and is a gold mine of information.

Why would you be concerned about me expressing the words I love you ???

Are you fearful of love ???

Where do you see me claiming that I am "better than other people" ???

So, as you didn't answer the question that I previously posted I will ask you again, did you read the articles that I posted ???

THANK YOU.



http://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/3/3D_emoticon_S34.gif With LOVE http://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/3/3D_emoticon_S36.gif

[spacegurl]

I LOVE YOU.

G'day Spacegurl.

Maybe the links do not work for you, but they do for me and no other person has said that they didn't work. So maybe it's just you that has the problem.

Actually there is plenty of evidence. For instance, since 1972 in Australia, the only deaths caused by the measles, each and every person that died had been vaccinated. Yes, that's right, there are no non-vaccinated deaths for over 35 years.

Did you watch the videos that I posted links for ???

The first group of links is by a doctor that uses Government reports to show the dangers of vaccines, explains how the anit-bodies do not fight the virus, and is a gold mine of information.

Why would you be concerned about me expressing the words I love you ???

Are you fearful of love ???

Where do you see me claiming that I am "better than other people" ???

So, as you didn't answer the question that I previously posted I will ask you again, did you read the articles that I posted ???

THANK YOU.



http://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/3/3D_emoticon_S34.gif With LOVE http://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/3/3D_emoticon_S36.gif

Again you didn't pay attention to my last post. I have answered that last question. YES I did click on those articles you posted but they don't appear. The page couldn't be found. I checked the main source of the links and found it was fundementalist christian who don't believe in freedom of choice and they are extremely anti-abortion. They even have a Harry Potter page examining why they believe it's evil. That was where your articles originally come from.

Yes I looked at the videos but I don't like viewing them because not all of us have broadband and YouTube isn't sufficient evidence. Who is the doctor again? what's his name?

What have measles got to do with this thread? it's about cervical cancer.

The articles don't work because the pages couldn't be found on those websites. They've been removed.

Don't change the subject and this isn't a debate about love.

[pri01]

I am a little suspicious about the vaccine for young girls, and apparantly extended to boys. The cost of this exercise is astronomical compared to the current budgitary strains put upon the UK NHS system. I read in the press that each vaccine cost's £300. In addition, this cost is justified because there are 1000 deaths per year from cervical cancer. The numbers do not add up. There must be other medical conditions that are more prolific that deserve more attention. This vaccine in my opinion is suspicious, and I would not want my 15 year old daughter to have it.

[hagbard_celine]

Have you actually read the stuff you posted, I Am ALL I AM? Four of the links on your post are all dead.

To Celine, you need to look at different sides of the coin and not make rash judgements. I wonder if you studied IAMALLIAM's post or just scan-read it and found words that conjured up 'conspiracy'? You need to be objective when you read articles in newspapers. They're designed to scare people and it works.
Have a look at this:
http://www.cancerhelp.org.uk/help/default.asp?page=16024

Maybe, but other publications are desinged to reasure people falsly. Remember that the manufacturer has a vested interest in the health services buying and using this. The pharmaceitical industry also has a lot of clout in so-called "independant" bodies. It was within living memory that all the doctors were singing the praises of Thalidomide. This Pap vaccine is a new product from an industry whose safety record would have it grounded if it were an airline. Yes, I've looked at both sides of the issue. I've spoken to doctors and I'm not willing to risk my child's health on this treatment. for me the danger is greater than the danger of cervical cancer.

She's only 12, far too young to worry about this cancer anyway. When she's an adult she can make up her own mind.

[hagbard_celine]

Hi hagbard_celine,

Don't let your daughter have the Vaccine...... I started a thread about this a while back :

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=5175

Love
&
Peace

Thanks mate. :)

I've already decided she's not having it.

[hagbard_celine]

A couple more threads

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4039

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=4033

Thanks. :) I see this is not a new subject.

[hagbard_celine]

To Hagbard Celine,[/B] do you really want to take the advice from Bible Bashers or do you prefer to listen to actual scientific data? Your daughter's life and health is basically in your hands, although bare in mind that cervical cancer isn't widespread or contagious so I don't think she'll be at risk if she doesn't take the vaccine.

That's a positive and negative ad hominen in one sentance!:confused: Yes, I'm aware that my daughter's health is in my hands. If I didn't care about it I'd go ahead and let them inject her.

Yeah, I know that the virus is sexually transmittable so, as a 12-year old, she's not going to be effected because she's not sexually active yet (I hope!:eek:) The virus was discovered when they found out that nuns never got cervical cancer.

[hagbard_celine]

I LOVE YOU.

G'day Hagbard Celine.

You are welcome mate. I am glad that you are only concerned with your daughters well being, it shows a loving nature and a willingness to stick up for someone that you love against those that would harm her. Well done mate, you are a true example for others !!!

THANK YOU.



http://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/3/3D_emoticon_S34.gif With LOVE http://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/3/3D_emoticon_S36.gif

Thanks, Iam. :)

I appreciate the information. Unlike Spacegurl, I'm not bothered that it comes from Judicalwatch. In fact they're stuff is well worth reading and one doesn't need to be a "bible-basher" to appreciate it.:D

[hagbard_celine]

It's all over the bloody news today. They had a doctor on BBC Breakfast "recomending" it.:mad::p

[diamond dogs]

On the radio today they were giving statistics of the take up of the vaccine at a local school..from 143 pupils (girls 12-13) 110 had the vaccine they quoted a 77% take up from schools in the area...they had snippets of interviews with young girls that had taken the jab stating they could not feel a thing and a nurse administering the vaccine promoting it swiftly followed by advertising (why the hell they need to) on the local radio station as if it was something done during a break or similar.

I don't have a daughter of that age but I would be appalled at the flippant way it is casually muted and the manour in which it is being promoted..these pathological liars in charge of the country are hell bent in fulfilling the agenda and I have no doubt whatsoever that these injections to young girls are part of the criteria....outrageous and about time these parents woke up :mad:

[devotional soul]

I believe this vaccine will make this generation of girls infertile and unable to have children. It makes sense once you know they want population control.

If they really cared about saving people from cancer, they would let the b17 laetrille truth be known.

There have been lots of negative effects and deaths related to this barely researched vax.

http://www.whale.to/vaccine/hpv_vaccine1.html
http://www.whale.to/vaccines/hpv11.html

Cervical cancer is only fatal if it is not found early. Many woman have survived by having check ups. My mom made it!

[hagbard_celine]

On the radio today they were giving statistics of the take up of the vaccine at a local school..from 143 pupils (girls 12-13) 110 had the vaccine they quoted a 77% take up from schools in the area...they had snippets of interviews with young girls that had taken the jab stating they could not feel a thing and a nurse administering the vaccine promoting it swiftly followed by advertising (why the hell they need to) on the local radio station as if it was something done during a break or similar.

I don't have a daughter of that age but I would be appalled at the flippant way it is casually muted and the manour in which it is being promoted..these pathological liars in charge of the country are hell bent in fulfilling the agenda and I have no doubt whatsoever that these injections to young girls are part of the criteria....outrageous and about time these parents woke up :mad:

I heard about that on the news at a the moment. There's another drive to push it into schools. I'm checking my kid's school newsletter carefully in case they try any funny buisiness liek they did with the fingerprinting.:mad:

[hagbard_celine]

I believe this vaccine will make this generation of girls infertile and unable to have children. It makes sense once you know they want population control.

If they really cared about saving people from cancer, they would let the b17 laetrille truth be known.

There have been lots of negative effects and deaths related to this barely researched vax.

http://www.whale.to/vaccine/hpv_vaccine1.html
http://www.whale.to/vaccines/hpv11.html

Cervical cancer is only fatal if it is not found early. Many woman have survived by having check ups. My mom made it!

Why's it being targeted on girls in their early teens?:rolleyes::confused: Because this cancer has been positively linked to an aquired virus it's only older, sexually active women who are at risk.

[smashstuff]

Gardasil - 18 Dead, Thousands Suffer Complications
Growing opposition and flat sales trigger Gardasil manufacturer Merck stock sell-off

By Thaddeus M. Baklinski

July 8, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - The public interest group Judicial Watch recently obtained more than 8,000 reports, under the US Freedom of Information law, of adverse events in girls and young women after they were injected with the HPV vaccine Gardasil.

The reports reveal everything from massive wart outbreaks to seizures, paralysis and death.

Ten deaths have been reported since September 2007, bringing the total to 18 since the vaccine was approved for use in 2006.

In this year there have been 140 reported "serious" complications, 27 of which were categorized as "life-threatening," as well as ten spontaneous abortions and six cases of Guillain-Barré Syndrome, a very rare (1 in 100,000 in a healthy population) immune response to foreign antigens such as infectious agents or vaccines, that paralyzes the afflicted person.

"Given all the questions about Gardasil, the best public health policy would be to reevaluate its safety and to prohibit its distribution to minors. In the least, governments should rethink any efforts to mandate or promote this vaccine for children," stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

Gwen Landolt, national vice-president of REAL Women of Canada commented on the lack of proper testing before Gardasil was pushed through the approval process and the consequences of its widespread use.

"The long-term consequences of Gardasil are not known. The manufacturer admits this and agrees it does not know its effect on young girls' cancer risk, on their immunity system, on their reproductive system, or its genetic effects. In due course, we will know this, possibly in twenty or thirty years from now when these young girls, the innocent subjects of the Gardasil experiment have become grown women and then report the consequences of their having taken the medication in their childhood on medical advice."

Cynthia Janak, a freelance journalist and researcher, reported to the American Life League that she found evidence in the FDA's documentation that they knew that HPV is not the actual cause of cervical cancer but that the actual cause is a "persistent HPV infection that may act as a tumor promoter in cancer induction."

Janak explains: "What we have here is proof that there is scientific evidence that has been published in the past 15 years that states that HPV infection does not bear a direct relationship to the forming of cervical cancer. It also tells us that HPV, if allowed to will be taken care of by our own body's natural processes. . ."most infections are short-lived and not associated with cervical cancer." With this being said, why do we need Gardasil when our own body is more than capable of eradicating HPV? What we need is a government policy to assist women with the cost of getting follow-up tests when persistent HPV infection is present. This would make more sense and our government would save so much money on these types of programs instead of $360 each for the Gardasil vaccination."

The Judicial Watch press release concluded that "It could well be that the vaccine may not do a thing to protect anyone from cervical cancer, regardless of the claims being made by Merck Pharmaceutical. What the vaccine is causing is death and immense suffering among those who have been vaccinated."

After CBS News ran a story about the reported side effects of Gardasil, citing the 8,000 adverse event reports and giving details of a few serious complications - seizures, chronic pain, paralysis, and death from blood clots, the Wall Street Journal reported that Merck & Co.'s shares dropped 4.8% triggering a sell-off of the company's stock and a downgrade of their rating on the New York Stock Exchange.

[smashstuff]

Controversial HPV Vaccine Causing One Death Per Month: FDA Report
140 "serious" adverse reactions, including 27 "life threatening" cases, 10 spontaneous abortions, and 6 cases of the debilitating Guillain-Barre Syndrome reported since January 2008

By Peter J. Smith

WASHINGTON, D.C., July 3, 2008 (LifeSiteNews.com) - One death per month is the average loss of life associated with the cervical cancer vaccine Gardasil according to an FDA report obtained by a government watchdog agency.

Merck, the makers of Gardasil, are poised to make profits in the billions from the vaccine, which protects against some cancer-causing forms of the sexually transmitted human papilloma virus (HPV), but the pharmaceutical giant has come under heavy criticism for fast-tracking the drug onto the market without adequate testing in order to beat out its rivals.

Judicial Watch, a public interest group that campaigns against government corruption, uncovered documents through the Freedom of Information Act that show the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) received reports of 10 deaths associated with Gardasil since September 2007, and 140 "serious" reports of adverse reactions, including 27 "life threatening" cases, 10 spontaneous abortions, and 6 cases of the debilitating Guillain-Barre Syndrome since January 2008.

Judicial Watch also found 8,864 Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) records associated with Gardasil, more than double the 3,461 events that had been reported with the HPV vaccine in Fall 2007. Many experienced outbreaks of genital warts from the HPV vaccine.

The watchdog group says the number of deaths associated with the vaccine is at least 18 and possibly as many as 20.

Eleven deaths occurred less than a week after receiving the vaccine. Seven women died in less than two days. The most common diagnosed cause was blood clotting. One woman died from a clot within 3 hours of the vaccine. One 20-year-old woman, with no medical history reported, died April 4, 2008 just four days after receiving Gardasil.

The serious adverse events include anaphylactic shock, grand mal convulsion, foaming at mouth, coma, paralysis, and death.

Another 23 year-old woman was vaccinated with her first dose of Gardasil on January 31, 2008 and thereupon went into anaphylactic shock. The report says, "patient experienced anaphylactic shock 2 minutes after vaccination characterized by a brief loss of consciousness... respiratory arrest, eyes rolled upwards, blurred vision and greyish skin tone... Anaphylactic shock was considered to be immediately life-threatening."

A 14 year-old girl took six steps after being injected with the vaccine before she collapsed to the floor unconscious and foaming at the mouth. The girl regained consciousness after "a 60 second grand mal seizure" and had "pale clammy skin" and blood pressure of 60/40.

A VAERS report from a physician stated a female patient was inoculated with a dose of Gardasil and, "Subsequently, the patient experienced a coma and is now paralyzed."

Merck & Co. has invested heavily in getting US states to mandate Gardasil to schoolgirls as young as 11 for sexually transmitted HPV in order to beat out rival GlaxoSmithKline's vaccine Cervarix. Merck successfully lobbied the FDA to fast track Gardasil to the market, which critics have charged essentially makes US women part of a massive testing experiment.

JPMorgan Analyst Chris Schott told Forbes.com that since GlaxoSmithKline PLC was delaying submitting more information to the FDA on its cervical cancer treatment Cervarix until the first half of 2009, he projects Merck to dominate the market, while Cervarix will manage only 25% market share by 2012.

"Given all the questions about Gardasil, the best public health policy would be to re-evaluate its safety and to prohibit its distribution to minors," said Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton. "In the least, governments should rethink any efforts to mandate or promote this vaccine for children."

http://www.lifesitenews.com/ldn/2008/jul/08070316.html

[smashstuff]

Whoever heard of taking a vaccine to stop cancer anyway? Utter nonsense. And how very convenient that Jade Goody is told she has Cervical Cancer, on TELEVISION no less, just when the vaccine is rolled out! What are we, fucking idiots?

[gizmocrystal]

My job is to screen for cervical cancer.

At work when i am screening for stages of pre cancerous stages-

There are mild,moderate and severe then carcinoma in situ and finally cancer.

Mostly we see mild changes with HPV which may regress on there own.(they have another smear in 6 months time to check) We see moderate in people who have not been screened in a long time or in people who dont want to come for treatment also the same for severe.

Alot of people think when they have an abnormal smear that it is cancer.- It isnt it is pre cancerous changes that COULD progress.

The incidence in cervical cancer is coming down and it is hoped that in the future there will be less cases, but it wont stop all cervical cancers, only for types 16 and 18 (I have been away on holiday so i need to check on this, will clarify when i go back to work tommorrow)

But i do know that alot of us have this HPV already it just depends on your body, if it can fight it off etc....

They are trying to give it to the girls before they become sexually active, because after that they may have the virus already.

I am not sure what to think about it being very suspicious of everything anyway, but i will be keeping an eye out, i suppose we wont find out untill the generation that are being vacc are 25 years old when screening starts.

I will see what i can find out for you........................:)

[biblegirl]

http://qkem5a.bay.livefilestore.com/y1phw8-fy4ebNjG0c_h5a6i7j8dPZyhd41fmmcb-jWnsKuy9oK3WQWVub4ErgGTlYM3FhXfQjN39tqQeFpDfpXf79X 4gLj3sClF/garda.jpg
http://putasparanoias.blogspot.com/
.

[halliburton crusher]

Ashley Ryburn's life ruined by HPV (Gardasil) vaccine - YouTube

THIS VIDEO IS HEART WRENCHING AND PEOPLE NEED TO BE AWARE OF THIS AS WELL AS OTHER INSANE PRACTICES IN SOCIETY.

[gaias child]

There is this story too a group of teenage girls have been left disabled by vaccines and are suing glaxo smith kline http://www.thisiswesternmorningnews.co.uk/news/Schoolgirl-13-sues-company-cancer-jab/article-921589-detail/article.html

WESTCOUNTRY schoolgirl is among a group of teenagers taking legal action against the makers of a controversial cervical cancer jab – claiming it caused side-effects such as paralysis and breathing problems.
The Cervarix vaccine is being given to all girls aged 12 and 13, but hundreds have reported complaints including fainting, seizures, fatigue, muscular aches and lethargy.
The Government and the makers of the drug claim it will give 70 per cent protection from cervical cancer – the disease which killed reality television star Jade Goody – to every girl under 18 by 2011.
Yesterday, the Department of Health said there was "no evidence" that the drug, which is administered to millions of people worldwide, carried long-term side-effects.
But five girls and their parents have formed a group to sue the makers of the vaccine, GlaxoSmithKline, for damages under the Consumer Protection Act.
a company spokesman said the doses had been monitored for six years and studies had shown it was "generally well-tolerated".
The girls are seeking up to £120,000 each depending on the severity of the side-effects.
Hattie Vickery, 13, of Honiton, Devon, is suing the chemical firm with the help of her parents Sophie, 35, and Clive Vickery, 35, a policeman.
They claim the vaccine has turned Hattie from a normal teenager into an "invalid" plagued with paralysis, breathing problems and sickness. Mother-of-two Sophie said Hattie had two jabs and was now unable to use her arm and suffered a series of side-effects.
"We were all so naive when we agreed to let our girls have this jab. Loads of parents agreed and it was a general feeling of safety in numbers, but we feel we were badly misguided. We are taking this legal action because we feel this vaccine was rushed in and our girls have been human guinea pigs who suffered as a result."
Hattie was given two jabs in October and January but her mother stopped her having a third injection planned for this month after she fell ill.
Mrs Vickery said: "The first time, she felt dizzy and sick and her arm went floppy and she was in pain for days. We had to go to hospital and she has not been able to use the arm properly since.
"Foolishly, we let her have the second jab and it has just made the arm worse. She stills gets headaches and nausea and she is now complaining of eye pain."
The jab is being given out in an attempt to cut the number of women contracting human papilloma virus (HPV).
Some have dubbed it the "promiscuity jab" because it protects girls against sexually-transmitted HPV, which causes 70 per cent of cervical tumours.
The legal action has been launched by solicitor Peter Todd, a vaccine specialist with London legal firm Hodge Jones & Allen.

[kiwimaj]

Whoever heard of taking a vaccine to stop cancer anyway? Utter nonsense. And how very convenient that Jade Goody is told she has Cervical Cancer, on TELEVISION no less, just when the vaccine is rolled out! What are we, fucking idiots?

Some people you talk to complete disregard the Jade/jab connection, they cannot get it into their heads that it was all a set up, they look at you as if you are barking mad or something...so many people still so brainwashed...:(

[banphrionsalola]

Some people you talk to complete disregard the Jade/jab connection, they cannot get it into their heads that it was all a set up, they look at you as if you are barking mad or something...so many people still so brainwashed...:(

i agree. the irish government planned to bring this vaccine in to all girls over 12 but due to budget cuts (the auld recession) the plan got axed. thank goodness for that. educating the kids on the importance of safe sex and following a healthy diet is a much more practial solution to preventing the disease. why would people care about practising safe sex when they knew there was a jab they could take to supposedly prevent the disease. its scare mongering by the health professionals whose pockets are being lined by the big Pharmas.

[the infinite one]

http://www.drday.com

Lorraine Day - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This woman is spot on regarding Cancer cures!