Revelation 9 11:

[lightgiver]

Revelation 9 11:

Their king is the angel from the bottomless pit; his name in Hebrew is [Abaddon,] and in Greek, [Apollyon]--the Destroyer.

http://www.scribd.com/doc/3216898/revelation-9-11

[daro2096]

Have you read Testimonies to the Church vol 9 page 11?

[kooskoets]

Have you read Testimonies to the Church vol 9 page 11?

http://www.gilead.net/egw/books/testimonies/Testimonies_for_the_Church_Volume_Nine/index.htm

Interesting

written in 1947 i suppose...

[lightgiver]

http://www.gilead.net/egw/books/testimonies/Testimonies_for_the_Church_Volume_Nine/index.htm

Interesting

written in 1947 i suppose...

Cheers for that :)


2001: On September 11th the attack on the World Trade Center is
...orchestrated by Britain, America and Israel under the orders of the
Rothschilds as a pretext for removing the liberty of people worldwide in
exchange for security, just as they did with the Reichstag fire in
Germany where the citizens were lied to in order to give up liberty for
security

2006: On 7 July the London Underground Network is bombed. Israel’s
Finance Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu is in London on the morning of the
attacks in order to attend an economic conference in a hotel over the
underground station where one of the blasts occurred, but stayed in his
hotel room instead after he had been informed by Israeli intelligence
officials attacks were expected. There are now only 5 nations on the
world left without a Rothschild controlled central bank: Iran; North
Korea; Sudan; Cuba; and Libya

[paloem]

i seen the news last night and it had the map of asia on it from left to right #
iran..iraq..isreal..syria..afganistan..china.. and russia

iran has ambitions to control iraq which borders isreal, syria on the other side of that afganistan borders russia and china what would happen if china and russia decided that iraq should be part of the islamic republic supported by china and russia afganistan borders pakistan a nucler state and china another nuclear state communism and islam are the enemys of the west apparently. afganistan and pakistan combined would give a large part of the world over to people that the us and britan dont want it controlled by it would be a mistake to presume that the world would be safer. we in our western societys are complaining that our freedoms are being eradicated what about the people in those countries that just want to live lives with freedoms that we take for granted. im not condoning war, war is evil, im only trying to understand for myself what all this is about. peace

[lightgiver]

i seen the news last night and it had the map of asia on it from left to right #
iran..iraq..isreal..syria..afganistan..china.. and russia

iran has ambitions to control iraq which borders isreal, syria on the other side of that afganistan borders russia and china what would happen if china and russia decided that iraq should be part of the islamic republic supported by china and russia afganistan borders pakistan a nucler state and china another nuclear state communism and islam are the enemys of the west apparently. afganistan and pakistan combined would give a large part of the world over to people that the us and britan dont want it controlled by it would be a mistake to presume that the world would be safer. we in our western societys are complaining that our freedoms are being eradicated what about the people in those countries that just want to live lives with freedoms that we take for granted. im not condoning war, war is evil, im only trying to understand for myself what all this is about. peace

How do you know Iran has plans to control Iraq?

Isnt the west doing that?


Backdoor deals

Although official U.S. policy still barred the export of U.S. military equipment to Iraq, some was evidently provided on a "don't ask - don't tell" basis. In April 1984, the Baghdad interests section asked to be kept apprised of Bell Helicopter Textron's negotiations to sell helicopters to Iraq, which were not to be "in any way configured for military use" . The purchaser was the Iraqi Ministry of Defense. In December 1982, Bell Textron's Italian subsidiary had informed the U.S. embassy in Rome that it turned down a request from Iraq to militarize recently purchased Hughes helicopters. An allied government, South Korea, informed the State Department that it had received a similar request in June 1983 (when a congressional aide asked in March 1983 whether heavy trucks recently sold to Iraq were intended for military purposes, a State Department official replied "we presumed that this was Iraq's intention, and had not asked.")

Rumsfeld also met with Iraqi Foreign Minister Tariq Aziz, and the two agreed, "the U.S. and Iraq shared many common interests." Rumsfeld affirmed the Reagan administration's "willingness to do more" regarding the Iran-Iraq war

http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/NSAEBB/NSAEBB82/iraq44.pdf

Donald Rumsfeld shaking hands with Saddam Hussein after selling him(and the rest) WMDs
Donald Rumsfeld salute Saddam Hussein - YouTube

Iran–Iraq War - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Published on Monday, April 11, 2005 by TomDispatch.com


Oil, Geopolitics, and the Coming War with Iran

As the United States gears up for an attack on Iran, one thing is certain: the Bush administration will never mention oil as a reason for going to war. As in the case of Iraq, weapons of mass destruction (WMD) will be cited as the principal justification for an American assault. "We will not tolerate the construction of a nuclear weapon [by Iran]," is the way President Bush put it in a much-quoted 2003 statement. But just as the failure to discover illicit weapons in Iraq undermined the administration's use of WMD as the paramount reason for its invasion, so its claim that an attack on Iran would be justified because of its alleged nuclear potential should invite widespread skepticism

http://www.commondreams.org/views05/0411-21.htm

you need to delve deeper :)


The New Boss same as the Old Boss

[daro2096]

http://www.gilead.net/egw/books/testimonies/Testimonies_for_the_Church_Volume_Nine/index.htm

Interesting

written in 1947 i suppose...

No, written around 1904. Pages 12 and 13 are the interesting bits.

"On one occasion, when in New York City, I was in the night season called upon to behold buildings rising story after story toward heaven. These buildings were warranted to be fireproof, and they were erected to glorify their owners and builders. Higher and still higher these buildings rose, and in them the most costly material was used.

"As these lofty buildings went up, the owners rejoiced with ambitious pride that they had money to use in gratifying self and provoking the envy of their neighbors. Much of the money that they thus invested had been obtained through exaction, through grinding down the poor.

"The scene that next passed before me was an alarm of fire. Men looked at the lofty and supposedly fire-proof buildings and said: 'They are perfectly safe.' But these buildings were consumed as if made of pitch. The fire engines could do nothing to stay the destruction. The firemen were unable to operate the engines."