Anyone read 'Who Built the Moon'?

[richardlism]

I recently read it because of David's clear links towards it. I must say that the third theory did seem very bizarre and a lot like guess work to me! I hope David's new book has a lot more substance.

[mauviene]

Mysteries shall forever remain undisclosed

Unless NASA decides to reveal their secrets..nothing from the public sector (which includes david icke) can truly have knowledge of this stuff...

[gavinsmith]

I recently read it because of David's clear links towards it.

I ordered a copy from eBay just yesterday for the same reasons.

[cluas]

I haven't read it, but there is a good interview HERE (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/luna/esp_luna_28.htm)

(Biblioteca Pleyades)

:cool:

[richardlism]

If anyone has actually read it did you find the arguements persuasive because I didn't, atleast not in their attempts to explain why the moon is artificial. The beginning of the text was extremely well written, and informed me a lot about stuff I had no clue about.

[beldazar]

I haven't read it, but there is a good interview HERE (http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/luna/esp_luna_28.htm)

(Biblioteca Pleyades)

:cool:

Thanks for posting that :)

[lester diamond]

I think it was very well written and plausible to begin with but the theory they offer at the end seems like they were clutching at straws. Its funny because early in the book they talk about scientists ignoring and failing to explain things they dont understand which is exactly what they go on to do. It is definately worth a read i just dont agree with the conclusions they came to and dont understand how seemingly intelligent people could come to the conclusions they did with regaurds ET life and time travel.

[magic_box]

It is definately worth a read i just dont agree with the conclusions they came to and dont understand how seemingly intelligent people could come to the conclusions they did with regaurds ET life and time travel.

Agreed.

I thought it was intriguing towards the beginning and certainly a good introduction to the whole moon-not-as-it-seems idea, opened my eyes to a few surprising facts but I did feel some of it was padding or as has been said, grasping at straws...

[zyphus]

I must say that the third theory did seem very bizarre and a lot like guess work to me!

Christopher Knight co-wrote it, what did you expect?

[richardlism]

Considering I'm not aware of him, I have no idea.

[paulside]

It is definately worth a read i just dont agree with the conclusions they came to and dont understand how seemingly intelligent people could come to the conclusions they did with regaurds ET life and time travel.

Agreed, although Its still a thought provoking read, two much better books on this subject are:

Our Mysterious Spaceship Moon - Don Wilson 1975
Secrets of our Spaceship Moon - Don Wilson 1979

I would defy anyone to read these two books and then still believe that our Moon is a natural object :confused:

[richardlism]

Agreed, although Its still a thought provoking read, two much better books on this subject are:

Our Mysterious Spaceship Moon - Don Wilson 1975
Secrets of our Spaceship Moon - Don Wilson 1979

I would defy anyone to read these two books and then still believe that our Moon is a natural object :confused:

thanks for the heads up!

[lester diamond]

Yeah cheer i will look out for those Don Wilson book as well.

[tosso]

"The question of why the Moon had to be built is easy to answer: To produce all life, especially humans. As to who did it – well that’s a lot tougher! We give the three possibilities we can think of, namely: God, aliens or humans. The only one of these that is 100% scientifically possible is the last one."

i think the last one is most possible in my eyes too ..

[neoconsumer]

"The question of why the Moon had to be built is easy to answer: To produce all life, especially humans. As to who did it – well that’s a lot tougher! We give the three possibilities we can think of, namely: God, aliens or humans. The only one of these that is 100% scientifically possible is the last one."

i think the last one is most possible in my eyes too ..

Hmmm, not sure why that option is 100% scientifically possible and the others are not. Humans could be "aliens" to this earth anyway for all I know!

[informationtransit]

I am in the middle of reading it and it's at least another perspective to consider.
I personally feel a great attraction to the Moon and to our experience of night itself, so i find it incredibly intriguing about the level of speculation regarding it's origins.

Have a listen

http://www.myspace.com/orphansunlight

[soul_traveller]

Also have a look at the following published in Epoch Times 2008 - Origins of the Moon:

http://epoch-archive.com/a1/en/ca/yto/2008/01-Jan/31/ET06B.pdf