View Full Version : The Latest 9/11 Revelation
thellght
26-04-2010, 07:48 PM
Shame On Jesse Ventura!
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/04/21/jeffrey-scott-shapiro-jesse-venture-book-lies-truthers-ground-zero-sept-shame/
Bombshell: Silverstein Wanted To Demolish Building 7 On 9/11
http://www.prisonplanet.com/bombshell-silverstein-wanted-to-demolish-building-7-on-911.html
YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.
largejack
26-04-2010, 08:04 PM
Shame On Jesse Ventura!
http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/04/21/jeffrey-scott-shapiro-jesse-venture-book-lies-truthers-ground-zero-sept-shame/
Bombshell: Silverstein Wanted To Demolish Building 7 On 9/11
http://www.prisonplanet.com/bombshell-silverstein-wanted-to-demolish-building-7-on-911.html
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PBnuSd7fRpY
Ha, when you put "shame on Jesse Ventura," I thought you meant he'd betrayed the truth movement, or something?
dude111
26-04-2010, 08:46 PM
Jesse is joining us!!!!
Someone should invite him ashore here :)
frase
26-04-2010, 09:16 PM
That Shill cunt journalist has been DESTROYED in comments section....
clint_giles
26-04-2010, 09:42 PM
what an honest journalist
lol
thedefender
26-04-2010, 09:54 PM
Ha, when you put "shame on Jesse Ventura," I thought you meant he'd betrayed the truth movement, or something?
So did...I said to myself "uh oh here we go". LOL
redorbluepill
26-04-2010, 11:32 PM
Wow the comments are.....the comments are good! I am shocked!
ps3andhdtv
26-04-2010, 11:39 PM
This was all over the start of the AJ show on Friday. Interesting stuff and worth downloading for a listen.
twistedconcept
26-04-2010, 11:44 PM
Another prostitute does as his masters tell him.
A disgusting article by a worthless individual.
kryst
26-04-2010, 11:49 PM
Hehe.
I feel sorry for Jeffrey Scott Shapiro, knowing for the rest of his life that he's betrayed humanity.
pound
27-04-2010, 12:03 AM
Like someone pointed out already. AJ ripped this guy a new a-hole on his friday show.
crisitunity
27-04-2010, 01:32 AM
wow the genie really is loose, all of the comments are calling the author out for being a fool.
Awesome
thesloth
27-04-2010, 02:43 AM
what an honest journalist
What to make of the other article linked at the end of this one?
Stories of prior knowledge of 9/11 more than urban legend (http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m1571/is_37_18/ai_92589583/)
"Do you see those two buildings?" he asked while pointing toward the World Trade Center. "They won't be standing there next week." It was noon, Sept. 6, 2001.
zetetic0void
27-04-2010, 02:41 PM
That Shill cunt journalist has been DESTROYED in comments section....
I don't see a comments section? Was it removed?
zetetic0void
27-04-2010, 02:44 PM
Oh I see the comments tab now
stelios
27-04-2010, 03:04 PM
Explosions before planes hit WTC 911 9/11 - YouTube
Proof WTC7 Was a CONTROLLED DEMOLITION - YouTube
ronisron
27-04-2010, 03:15 PM
Thumbs up for the folks leaving the comments.....:)
The PTB will never get past 9/11..... What a slippery slope it is for all concerned. Assholes. A shoddy production, bad actors, horrible script, and no one really bought the ending save the delusional who are blinded by fear. 9/11 opened the floodgates and was also the "catalyst" that good people needed.
There's just no looking back, nothing has been the same since that day.
zetetic0void
27-04-2010, 03:19 PM
Actually, sometimes I wonder if some journalists working in mass media are secretly trying to help 9/11 truth by putting out stories seeming to be against it but having details that don't add up inside them (or they just slip up).
Mentioning Larry Silverstein being on the phone to insurance company regarding whether the building should be brought down by controlled demolition doesn't really make much sense because it would take at least days to actually set that up for demolition.
So by actually mentioning that, it was either an accidental slip or a purposeful hint. But who knows
However, if there are really secretly some journalists out there pretending to be on the side of the official version so they can work in these mass media places, and who purposefully slip weird details into their stories, then they are great people.
----------
existenz
27-04-2010, 03:35 PM
Thumbs up for the folks leaving the comments.....:)
The PTB will never get past 9/11..... What a slippery slope it is for all concerned. Assholes. A shoddy production, bad actors, horrible script, and no one really bought the ending save the delusional who are blinded by fear. 9/11 opened the floodgates and was also the "catalyst" that good people needed.
There's just no looking back, nothing has been the same since that day.
yup. if 9/11 didn't wake people up, i wonder what can?
ronisron
27-04-2010, 03:46 PM
Actually, sometimes I wonder if some journalists working in mass media are secretly trying to help 9/11 truth by putting out stories seeming to be against it but having details that don't add up inside them (or they just slip up).
Mentioning Larry Silverstein being on the phone to insurance company regarding whether the building should be brought down by controlled demolition doesn't really make much sense because it would take at least days to actually set that up for demolition.
So by actually mentioning that, it was either an accidental slip or a purposeful hint. But who knows
However, if there are really secretly some journalists out there pretending to be on the side of the official version so they can work in these mass media places, and who purposefully slip weird details into their stories, then they are great people.
----------
As far as Silverstein goes, the fact that in a televised interview he said "I told the firefighters to pull it.." is a smoking gun that should have left no doubt. The reason being is that it DOES take extensive planning, and lots of man hours to wire a building that size for a precise demolition. This implies that 7 was wired well in advance of September 11.
amaralsright
27-04-2010, 04:40 PM
Mentioning Larry Silverstein being on the phone to insurance company regarding whether the building should be brought down by controlled demolition doesn't really make much sense because it would take at least days to actually set that up for demolition.
This is actually good stuff!
frase
27-04-2010, 06:56 PM
Love this comment!!!
Good afternoon Mr. Shapiro, I run a multinational demolition company. We are very interested in your unique knowledge. We understand that you know of people who within 60 minutes can do the following: - rig a 47 story building floor by floor - find the exact points to place the explosives to bring the building down at free fall speed - Perfectly time each charge so the building falls into it's very own foot print with no damage to the surrounding buildings Please contact us. Our last building demolition was a 32 story office building that took us 2 months to setup and finish working round the clock. We are in dire need of the talented people that you know of. Thank you for your incredible investigation.
Shapiro you mug-Your card is marked as a whore for your criminal cunt friends and you are an accessory to murder.....
rusticformer
27-04-2010, 07:22 PM
Controlled demolition.
No sound = No explosives?
So how did building 7 collapse then ?
look what I just found out.
Crack.Dexpan is a soundless and safe demolition agent which is quite different from ordinary demolition agents such as explosives and dangerous materials. It does not cause any fly rock, noise, ground vibration, gas, dust or any other environmental pollution when used properly.
Ok crack.Dexpan is not an explosive but still, what a joke.
He actually admits that building 7 was a controlled demo, and so this is proof then is it that the towers were not!
and it has taken them 9 years to up with this bull shit.
So the question is.
Was there a third plane planed to hit building 7 ?
And now they come up with this desperate and rather rubbish cover story?
Sorry I got that a bit wrong
They were talking about a controlled demo just before it collapsed.
How convenient. And what a coincidence it just happened to fall in its own footprint as if it were controlled.
silvertrowel
16-05-2010, 08:40 PM
Sorry to resurect an old thread but the foxnews link in the OP has changed
The old one was . http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/04/21/jeffrey-scott-shapiro-jesse-venture-book-lies-truthers-ground-zero-sept-shame/
The new one is .. http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2010/04/22/jeffrey-scott-shapiro-jesse-venture-book-lies-truthers-ground-zero-sept-shame/
I think it is important to update your favorites list and any other forums you have seen this discussed in order to avoid any confusion in future research/debate.
Thank you.