Prince Harry due in Iraq

[tinmenace]

LONDON, England (AP) -- Prince Harry will be serving as a soldier in Iraq by the end of the month, a British newspaper reported Saturday.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/02/17/harry.iraq.ap/index.html

You've got to wonder if he's being put in harms way deliberately. Especially since he's probably not Charles' son, and therefor not REALLY heir to the throne. So, just incase he ever makes it to the throne and starts a whole new bloodline...

I hope nothing happens to this kid, but it's going to be interesting to watch.

[warrior]

[QUOTE=tinmenace;8572]Prince Harry due in Iraq
[QUOTE]

Good, lets hope he gets shot

[eternal_spirit]

Well if they offed his mum Diana......

[jinjo5]

LONDON, England (AP) -- Prince Harry will be serving as a soldier in Iraq by the end of the month, a British newspaper reported Saturday.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/02/17/harry.iraq.ap/index.html

You've got to wonder if he's being put in harms way deliberately. Especially since he's probably not Charles' son, and therefor not REALLY heir to the throne. So, just incase he ever makes it to the throne and starts a whole new bloodline...

I hope nothing happens to this kid, but it's going to be interesting to watch.

One thing for sure is he wont be on the frontline.The royal family arent going to go through all that trouble of getting princess Di to produce male offspring to risk it being blown up in iraq.I bet he gets sent home if he gets an heavy cold.:rolleyes:

[bumble]

Good, lets hope he gets shot


Bit harsh that isn't worrior. He won't be on the frontline thats for sure. He will be in the cooking tent, or more likely in the refreshment tent tasting the booze.

[tinmenace]

..The royal family arent going to go through all that trouble of getting princess Di to produce male offspring ....

But they were assuming that she was producing the offspring of CHARLES. They're not interested in her offspring with some guy from the wrong bloodline.

[2013]

another of many interpretations ,Prince Harry's Destiny

Quatrain IV,#7

"The younger son of a great and hated prince,
will be greatly marked (by leprosy?) by the time he is twenty.
His mother will die of grief, very sad and thin,
and he will die when the cowardly flesh falls."

..younger son of a great and hated prince...
Charles may go down in history as a great and hated prince. Great because of his enlightened approach to complementary medicine and the metaphysical, but hated as a result of his rejection of the popular Diana in favour of Camilla Parker-Bowles. And Prince Harry is his youngest son.

...marked (by leprosy?) by the time he is twenty...
Harry’s mother did work and touch lepers in her charity work. Could this be marked out for a special role in the world or marked in the sense of physical or psychological wounding? Or could this be a revelation about his paternity that has been questioned in some quarters?

...His mother will die of grief, very sad and thin..
Harry's mother, Diana died (of grief?), certainly very sad and thin.

...and he will die when the cowardly flesh falls.
Is the cowardly flesh a reference to unknown assassins being found and punished at some point in the future?


http://www.astrology.co.uk/news/Nostradamus.htm
The sign of a good prophecy is it being recognised before the fact , of course a better sign would be to recognise and avoid it , thus rendering the prophecy null and void , but does that prove it or ?, always got me that 1 .:D

[jinjo5]

But they were assuming that she was producing the offspring of CHARLES. They're not interested in her offspring with some guy from the wrong bloodline.

From what i gather, i think the royal family were particularly after the Spencer bloodline.which diana would provide.

[tinmenace]

From what i gather, i think the royal family were particularly after the Spencer bloodline.which diana would provide.

Right, but mixed with Charles' bloodline, not with someone else's, and rumor has it that Harry is the son of James Hewitt. So, why would they want Hewitt's bloodline?

[bumble]

Right, but mixed with Charles' bloodline, not with someone else's, and rumor has it that Harry is the son of James Hewitt. So, why would they want Hewitt's bloodline?
Maybe James Hewitt also has a bloodline that they want. Might be interesting to look at his family tree.

[tinmenace]

Maybe James Hewitt also has a bloodline that they want. Might be interesting to look at his family tree.

Yes! That should be interesting.

[godsavengerslavenomore]

Good riddance you free loading ginger lizard twat. hope he steps on a mine.

[lord rothlizard]

Good riddance you free loading ginger lizard twat. hope he steps on a mine. Now that's not very nice is it?

Would he be a lizard if he was the offspring of Hewitt?

[godsavengerslavenomore]

Now that's not very nice is it?

Would he be a lizard if he was the offspring of Hewitt?

Most lizards are amphibian and cold blooded true? so are toads/hewitt.... :D

[tinmenace]

'Bullet magnet' fears for Harry

• Preparations being made for Prince Harry's deployment to Iraq, press reports say
• Prince, third in line to British throne, expected to serve in south of country
• Deployment raises fears prince could be targeted by insurgents or terrorists
• Police protection officers likely to continue to oversee Harry's security

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/02/19/harry.iraq/index.html

So, why send him? Why spend all the extra money to secure him in a war zone? Couldn't that money be spent elsewhere? I don't understand this. :confused:

[jenkalichen]

I'm thinking that maybe they want to off him "accidentaly like" as they off'd his mother, because he is a bastard and the whole world knows it now. They are a supremely violent bunch of smug inbred lunatics with nothing better to do than call the world useless eaters when the truth is they and their like are truly the most useless of all eaters. I am sure if they were all locked up together they would eventually resort to canabolism and the little bastard prince would be their first supper.

[limelady]

It is highly possible Prince Harry will be used as a 'sacrifice' to their 'gods'. I hope not, I like him - he has his mother's spirit - but the royal family has a tendancy to get rid of people don't they? If this is what they have in mind for Harry, then sending him to Iraq (Babylon) is probably part of the setting up of the ritual. If anything happens to Harry, just like Diana's death, WHERE he dies and the NUMEROLOGY involved will be very significant. They tend to do these rituals in style with lots of symbolism, so Ellis Taylor's site will be the one to watch for updates on this situation should it occur.

Hopefully it won't - Lets bombard this situation with lots of positive energy in the hope we can prevent it. Any time we can thwart their plans shows solidarity, and gives them a clear message we will not tolerate this crap anymore.

[notaslave]

I'm thinking that maybe they want to off him "accidentaly like" as they off'd his mother, because he is a bastard and the whole world knows it now. They are a supremely violent bunch of smug inbred lunatics with nothing better to do than call the world useless eaters when the truth is they and their like are truly the most useless of all eaters. I am sure if they were all locked up together they would eventually resort to canabolism and the little bastard prince would be their first supper.

Couldn't agree with you more. If I was the ginger bastard I wouldn't go near Iraq, indeed I would hide in the caves that multi-millionairre Osama supposedly hid in over in Afghanistan. [Call me stupid but I can't see any mega rich slumming it in a cave, yet the masses bought it]

[tinmenace]

Yes, that was my first reaction when I heard he was going to Iraq. I felt as though they were sending him to his death. Now they say they're sending security? That just doesn't make sense. They're going to endanger even more men in order to keep Harry safe? If they want to keep him out of harms way, they should keep him home.

Something just feels wrong about this.

[domtak]

Hey up. (First post!)

The moment I read the news about Harry going to Iraq I thought something bad is to happen to him. Deffo have a bad vibe with this.

D

[lord rothlizard]

Definetley getting a bad vibe on this one. The poor bugger couldn't help being brought in to this useless establishment. I feel sorry for the poor kid if this is what they have in store for him.

[father ted]

This is a great post tinmenace,
I personally think Harry is the actual son of Charles. You look at a new picture of him and he has a lot of his physical features: same eyes (close together), cheeks, mouth, even the same ears. He has his mother's jaw. If you look at a picture of him with a shaved head you can see this better.
Prince William on the other hand, looks very different to me. I don't think the Illuminati would have allowed Diana to have a bastard child with Hewitt, whom she actually liked.
It's William that is said by Arizona Wilder, to be sacraficed. I don't think they're gonna sacrafice Harry because of the fact that I beleive he is actually Charle's son.

I won't be supprised if he does get sacraficed though, I won't be supprised whomever they sacrafice. Apparently in the Harry Potter stories, which might have something to do with prince Harry, HPotter dies in the end. Might there be a connection? or am I joining too many dots here?

[tinmenace]

Glad you're enjoying the thread, it sure is an interesting topic.

It makes me sick just to think about it all....sacrificing people...I just can't get my mind wrapped around it.

[misscpb]

It is highly possible Prince Harry will be used as a 'sacrifice' to their 'gods'. I hope not, I like him - he has his mother's spirit - but the royal family has a tendancy to get rid of people don't they? If this is what they have in mind for Harry, then sending him to Iraq (Babylon) is probably part of the setting up of the ritual. If anything happens to Harry, just like Diana's death, WHERE he dies and the NUMEROLOGY involved will be very significant. They tend to do these rituals in style with lots of symbolism, so Ellis Taylor's site will be the one to watch for updates on this situation should it occur.

Hopefully it won't - Lets bombard this situation with lots of positive energy in the hope we can prevent it. Any time we can thwart their plans shows solidarity, and gives them a clear message we will not tolerate this crap anymore.

Hi There,

You know I was thinking the same thing myself when I read your post. ;)

[jinjo5]

It is highly possible Prince Harry will be used as a 'sacrifice' to their 'gods'. I hope not, I like him - he has his mother's spirit - but the royal family has a tendancy to get rid of people don't they? If this is what they have in mind for Harry, then sending him to Iraq (Babylon) is probably part of the setting up of the ritual. If anything happens to Harry, just like Diana's death, WHERE he dies and the NUMEROLOGY involved will be very significant. They tend to do these rituals in style with lots of symbolism, so Ellis Taylor's site will be the one to watch for updates on this situation should it occur.

Hopefully it won't - Lets bombard this situation with lots of positive energy in the hope we can prevent it. Any time we can thwart their plans shows solidarity, and gives them a clear message we will not tolerate this crap anymore.

If he his going to be sacrificed,which i doubt greatly,are there any dates which this could possibly happen in the future has with Princess di,JFK ETC.?

[tonto o_reilly]

I feel strongly and have for some time that THEY would find a way of getting rid of Harry. He is a threat to them I feel. And i agree with Limelady that this is the start of yet another ritual type situation. He is not one of them, and they know it.

TO

[jinjo5]

I feel strongly and have for some time that THEY would find a way of getting rid of Harry. He is a threat to them I feel. And i agree with Limelady that this is the start of yet another ritual type situation. He is not one of them, and they know it.

TO

Yes,but if the bloodline are totally obsessed with ritual,has david says,surely there are possible dates in the future when this could happen.

[limelady]

Yes,but if the bloodline are totally obsessed with ritual,has david says,surely there are possible dates in the future when this could happen.

Its possible they already DO have a date set for a "Harry' ritual - that's certainly how their sick, twisted minds work - but not being an adept or scholar of satanic cult ritual myself, or knowledgeable on the subject of numerology for that matter, I have no idea when a suitable date may be for such a ritual. However, because I am reasonable symbol-literate, I can always 'see' the signs of a ritual after the event.

Perhaps there IS someone on the forum with an 'occult events calendar' (or expertise in the fields I have mentioned), who could offer some possible suitable dates and times etc?

Lime

[eternal_spirit]

Like father like son a military man, if his real father is Hewitt which he does look alot more like than Charles, he's chosen to go to Iraqu. A disguise- a wig, glasses, a false nose would help him.

If he gets killed then the Uk and the Illuminati will habe the perfect excsuse to carry on the war with Iraqu ffs! :mad:

[jinjo5]

Its possible they already DO have a date set for a "Harry' ritual - that's certainly how their sick, twisted minds work - but not being an adept or scholar of satanic cult ritual myself, or knowledgeable on the subject of numerology for that matter, I have no idea when a suitable date may be for such a ritual. However, because I am reasonable symbol-literate, I can always 'see' the signs of a ritual after the event.

Perhaps there IS someone on the forum with an 'occult events calendar' (or expertise in the fields I have mentioned), who could offer some possible suitable dates and times etc?

Lime

It seems to me that there are countless "coincindences" after the event,princess di,m.monroe,JFK.etc.Surely someone knows enough of the symbolism/ritual to pre-empt any possible assassination.I dont think he will be killed anyway,andrew survived in the falklands.

[lord rothlizard]

It seems to me that there are countless "coincindences" after the event,princess di,m.monroe,JFK.etc.Surely someone knows enough of the symbolism/ritual to pre-empt any possible assassination.I dont think he will be killed anyway,andrew survived in the falklands. But Andrew is a true Royal and the Falklands didn't mean anything. So he may well be sacrificed as an excuse to attack Iran.

[warrior]

[QUOTE=tinmenace;8572]LONDON, England (AP) -- Prince Harry due in Iraq [QUOTE]


I am hoping the little scrote gets beheaded by Iraqi nationalists who despise invading forces, live on Al Jazeera

[jimijams]

[QUOTE=tinmenace;8572]LONDON, England (AP) -- Prince Harry due in Iraq [QUOTE]


I am hoping the little scrote gets beheaded by Iraqi nationalists who despise invading forces, live on Al Jazeera
Nobody deserves a fate like that, I do hope you were joking.

[quelyn]

LONDON, England (AP) -- Prince Harry will be serving as a soldier in Iraq by the end of the month, a British newspaper reported Saturday.

http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/02/17/harry.iraq.ap/index.html

You've got to wonder if he's being put in harms way deliberately. Especially since he's probably not Charles' son, and therefor not REALLY heir to the throne. So, just incase he ever makes it to the throne and starts a whole new bloodline...

I hope nothing happens to this kid, but it's going to be interesting to watch.
Oh please isn't this just good PR sending the prodigal son. I had a pal that was a "good old boy" from west Memphis, Arkansas that spent Viet Nam playing poker, dealing black market and cuddling with his local cutie. Now, he was a green beret BUT not royal bloodline or anything of that nature to my knowledge. THE son will be fine!

[jinjo5]

But Andrew is a true Royal and the Falklands didn't mean anything. So he may well be sacrificed as an excuse to attack Iran.

The royal family were at least willing to risk andrews life,he was supposedly on helicopter duty.not sure whether thats true or not.

[warrior]

Especially since he's probably not Charles' son, and therefor not REALLY heir to the throne.

What gave you that idea??? Not Charles son, he even looks like Charles alot more that the other brother. Why would you make such a suggestion that Charles is not the father.

[tinmenace]

It's not outside the realms of possibility for him to be the son of another man, is it?

[warrior]

It's not outside the realms of possibility for him to be the son of another man, is it?

Maybe, but I would expect ALOT more reason to suspect Charles in not the father than to simply say it is possible. The little runt even looks like Charles, so why suspect anyone else is his dad. The older son looks alot less like Charles than Harry.

[tinmenace]

I disagree. I think William looks just like Charles. Even the premature baldness... I don't know too much about Diana, but I do know that there was rumor that she was seeing other people around the time of Harry's conception (namely Hewitt). So, I have to keep an open mind about it. I'm not the type to exclude information just because it "can't possibly be". In this case it can very well be the case that Harry is not the son of Charles, and if that proves to be true then I'm very frightened for him. If they can murder his Mum, they can murder him.

Their entire focus is to keep their bloodline as pure as possible, and for someone as close to the throne as Harry, it's too much of a risk if he's not the son of Charles.

Besides, the whole Iraq story doesn't make sense. Why send him to Iraq, along with bodyguards (putting even more people in danger) just to protect him? It just doesn't make sense.

...Oh yeah, and not to forget that Iraq is modern-day Babylon. It all ties in with their wicked wicked beliefs.

[warrior]

if Harry wasn't Charles son and he was in any kind of danger then why would they wait until now??? If they had planned to eliminate him wouldn't they have done it long before now. It sounds just like hysterical paranoia to me.
And the reason he is being sent to Iraq should be obvious. It is another attempt to boost some kind of support for Blairs war in Iraq, and to a point it will probably work, some of the deluded will feel they should give more support to the british troops out in Iraq if a member of the supposedly royal family are out there. I am sure he won't be in any kind of danger out there. But if something should happen to him I won't feel any sympathy for him whatsoever, anybody who goes out to another country armed as an invader can expect trouble.

[tinmenace]

Maybe you're right, who really knows?

I just cannot eliminate any possibilities. I don't put anything past these people.

[limelady]

if Harry wasn't Charles son and he was in any kind of danger then why would they wait until now???

The timing is crucial. Such rituals are all about energy raising/and worship of ancient deities. Making their sacrificial offerings at the right times, the right places, and in the name of the right 'gods' is crucial to a successful event.
As such, occult calendar/festive' dates (sacred numerology) is very important to them. To sacrifice a Prince would be a VERY special ritual occasion, therefore EVERYTHING would have to be just right for such an event....including the media cover-up.

In the case of Harry in Iraq (Babylon) the place of the death would be of much significance ancient history-wise. Also, they have a penchant for sacrificing to a god with some sort of name or numerological association (birth dates, death dates etc) to a historical bloodline member (god/king etc).

Ellis Taylor http://www.ellisctaylor.com is an expert at this sort of thing. Have a look through his material and it will give you some idea of how all these sacrificial 'events' are orchestrated. Michael Tsarion is another with expertise in such matters.

[jinjo5]

The timing is crucial. Such rituals are all about energy raising/and worship of ancient deities. Making their sacrificial offerings at the right times, the right places, and in the name of the right 'gods' is crucial to a successful event.
As such, occult calendar/festive' dates (sacred numerology) is very important to them. To sacrifice a Prince would be a VERY special ritual occasion, therefore EVERYTHING would have to be just right for such an event....including the media cover-up.

In the case of Harry in Iraq (Babylon) the place of the death would be of much significance ancient history-wise. Also, they have a penchant for sacrificing to a god with some sort of name or numerological association (birth dates, death dates etc) to a historical bloodline member (god/king etc).

Ellis Taylor http://www.ellisctaylor.com is an expert at this sort of thing. Have a look through his material and it will give you some idea of how all these sacrificial 'events' are orchestrated. Michael Tsarion is another with expertise in such matters.

At the risk of repeating myself......if there are always "coincidences" after the event,surely these "coincidences" will be there before the event too.Cant someone who has extensive knowledge of the symbolism/ritual,like david,make a prediction.Are they scared of making that prediction,in case they are proven wrong therefore bringing scorn onto their theories/work.someone stick their neck out and make a prediction!

[warrior]

i will keep a watch to see if anything does happen to him. I wouldn't expect anything to happen him at all. I am sure this is just another propaganda publicity stunt to shore up some kind of support for having British troops in Iraq. And I have no reason to believe Harry is not Charles son.

[father ted]

At the risk of repeating myself......if there are always "coincidences" after the event,surely these "coincidences" will be there before the event too.Cant someone who has extensive knowledge of the symbolism/ritual,like david,make a prediction.Are they scared of making that prediction,in case they are proven wrong therefore bringing scorn onto their theories/work.someone stick their neck out and make a prediction!

The reason why David aint making a prediction is probably because he knows it's bullshit. Remember how Arizona told him in the interview that it is prince william to be sacraficed and that it's william who is not the son of charles. (they're probably still related though).

i will keep a watch to see if anything does happen to him. I wouldn't expect anything to happen him at all. I am sure this is just another propaganda publicity stunt to shore up some kind of support for having British troops in Iraq. And I have no reason to believe Harry is not Charles son.

I agree with that line of argument, they did the same thing with Elvis, for the reason that warrior gave. Probably another reason why predictions don't need to be made. I too think Harry is Charle's son, have a look at the facial features, they've even got the same ears!

[jimijams]

I too think Harry is Charle's son, have a look at the facial features, they've even got the same ears!
I can't see any resemblance to Charles only to Hewitt and she was having an affair with him at the time of conception.

http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/5550/79nc1gp9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)

[oneofmany]

I wish they were all facing the same way jimi, Id like to compare noses :D:D

[tonto o_reilly]

I can't see any resemblance to Charles only to Hewitt and she was having an affair with him at the time of conception.

http://img516.imageshack.us/img516/5550/79nc1gp9.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


oh my

Now if that doesnt clear up that issue I don't know what will!!!!:eek:

[father ted]

Look at a new picture of Harry, and compare that. Hair doesn't mean anything.

[limelady]

I've always thought there was a stunning likeness between Harry and Hewitt.
Hewitts looking a bit older now, but heres another couple of comparisons.

http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/3879/screenhunter372nb3.jpg

Their noses and mouths are almost exzctly the same.

http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/4458/screenhunter370mk4.jpg

[klinker]

I've always thought there was a stunning likeness between Harry and Hewitt.
Hewitts looking a bit older now, but heres another couple of comparisons.

http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/3879/screenhunter372nb3.jpg

Their noses and mouths are almost exzctly the same.

http://img175.imageshack.us/img175/4458/screenhunter370mk4.jpg

Yep. No doubt who his Daddy is.

[tonto o_reilly]

rather obvious I thought....even without the photos to prove it.
Di jumped the fence...and I would say probably with good reason too.

[tinmenace]

Geez, amazing how a change in gene pool can have such an incredible result. How handsome is Harry!!? :eek:

[father ted]

http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/6776/acprincecharleswilliamer1.th.jpg (http://img136.imageshack.us/my.php?image=acprincecharleswilliamer1.jpg)
http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/2595/prince20harry2tp0.th.jpg (http://img136.imageshack.us/my.php?image=prince20harry2tp0.jpg)http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/1294/38269492hewitt300sq9.th.jpg (http://img136.imageshack.us/my.php?image=38269492hewitt300sq9.jpg)

you can see hewit and hary side by side and appart from the red hair they look nothing alike.
To see similarities better, you need newer pics of hary, can't find them though.
Especially look at the ears. The one with charles standing next to william is a good one, william looks nothing like charles but in that pic charles looks a lot like harry, the cheeks, the ears, eyes close together.
I'm only 70% about this, I just thought I'd look at the other side of the coin after what Arizona said. Harry does seem to have somewhat the same eyebrows as hewit (to the side of the forehead).

[tonto o_reilly]

Gut instinct......... what does your intuition tell you on this Ted?

[tinmenace]

I think William absolutely looks like his father, even with the male-pattern baldness setting in at his early age. The shape and length of the face, the eyes, everything.

Hewitt doesn't have the smallest ears in town, so I don't think using the ears to confirm that Harry is Charles' son is a good example.

[snog]

I think I've gotta sway Father Teds' way on this one.

The more you look into pictures of Harry, you realize that he does look more like Charles than Hewit. The particular photo of Hewit posted in this section shows him pulling a rather unnatural face, where he does infact look like Harry, but in the others he looks very, very different.

[garth]

Im goin with the women on this one harry is hewitts son for sure. I reckon william looks a bit like charles but thank god a bit easier on the eyes than his dad, more like his gorgeous mum. Charles is a funny looking bugger and it used to look like beauty and the beast when he and di were in a photo together. lol What did she see in em?????

Shouldn't be mean, s'pose he can't help it cause its probably something in his genes lol

[snog]

Charles is a funny looking bugger and it used to look like beauty and the beast when he and di were in a photo together. lol What did she see in em?????

Shouldn't be mean, s'pose he can't help it cause its probably something in his genes lol

Exactly, its all about the genes. Diana was chosen long before they were married to be his wife. Do you honestly think she genuinely wanted to be with him? She always looked so uncomfortable when they were together in public. The whole thing was to maintain the royal bloodline

[tonto o_reilly]

yes of course this is true, but maybe di thought that adding another blood brew to the pot may cause for some slight contamination? She knew what was going on.........I feel no need to look at the pics. Harry is hewitts and THEY know it.

TO

[tonto o_reilly]

And for those of you who cannot see the the likenesses in the photos

Glasses - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Sorry, I couldn't help myself

TO

[tinmenace]

Hahahaha! Brilliant! :p

[lolo]

:confused: :D :eek: :cool: :p

[snog]

Ok, Ok...very funny :rolleyes:

It looks like it's just you and me Ted :cool:

[lolo]

Ok, Ok...very funny :rolleyes:

It looks like it's just you and me Ted :cool:

who is ted:cool:

[jimijams]

SAS to train Harry as hostage

http://img261.imageshack.us/img261/3378/harrywideweb470x3780cw2.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


March 5, 2007 - 11:56AM

Prince Harry is to be given special hostage training before he and his regiment head to southern Iraq in the coming months.

The Sun newspaper said today the 22-year-old royal and members of his Blues and Royals regiment were being put through their paces, probably by elite Special Air Service troops, amid fears he could be kidnapped by extremists.

Quoting an unnamed regiment source, it said the role-playing exercise was to take place in the next few days in eastern England, with the third in line to the throne playing the hostage.

His army colleagues will then have to stage an attack and a "rapid reaction" rescue mission using grenades and tear gas, it added.

"Heaven forbid if Harry should be taken into enemy hands," the source said. "It may well be the men next to him who make the difference between a swift solution or one of the biggest headaches of the conflict.

"Officially Harry is being treated just like any other soldier but in reality everyone knows how desperate the insurgents out there will be to get their hands on them."

The Ministry of Defence announced on February 22 that Prince Harry is to become the first British royal since his uncle Prince Andrew in 1982 to see active service when his reconnaissance unit is sent to Iraq in May and June.

Harry is a second lieutenant in the Blues and Royals and has always said he should receive no special treatment, despite security concerns.

"There's no way I'm going to put myself through Sandhurst (the elite army officers' training college) and then sit on my arse back home while my boys are out fighting for their country," he said in 2005.

He even reportedly threatened to quit the army if he was not allowed to witness front line action.

AFP
http://www.smh.com.au/news/world/sas-to-train-harry-as-hostage/2007/03/05/1172943323503.html

[jimijams]

"Heaven forbid if Harry should be taken into enemy hands,"
Indeed!;)


"There's no way I'm going to put myself through Sandhurst (the elite army officers' training college) and then sit on my arse back home while my boys are out fighting for their country," he said in 2005.
Pass me the bucket!

[oneofmany]

who is ted:cool:you definitly must be new :D

[warrior]

You might be right
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/05032007/140/al-qaeda-threat-kill-harry-iraq.html
will be watching to see what happens, probably simply more scaremongering, but maybe if they have him bumped off it will be a big boost to Blairs war on terror in Iraq and he is trying to boost numbers in Afganistan too, Harrys death probably would outrage the country, but it could also reverse, it could either start a call to boost their war on terror, or people might call for an end to the war, bring the troops home, why was he there in the first place, and so on

I'm thinking that maybe they want to off him "accidentaly like" as they off'd his mother, because he is a bastard and the whole world knows it now. They are a supremely violent bunch of smug inbred lunatics with nothing better to do than call the world useless eaters when the truth is they and their like are truly the most useless of all eaters. I am sure if they were all locked up together they would eventually resort to canabolism and the little bastard prince would be their first supper.

[tinmenace]

Right! I mean that is so obvious to everyone so why even risk it? Maybe it's a distraction.




CNN: Diana inquest-Royals on the stand? (http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/europe/03/04/diana.inquest.reut/index.html)

[tinmenace]

Report:Iraq militants vow to capture Prince Harry

• Militants set up squad to target UK's Prince Harry in Iraq, Guardian reports
• Mahdi Army commander says group has informants inside British army bases
• Harry, third in line to throne, due to be deployed to Iraq in next few weeks
• Military reported to be reconsidering the deployment for fear it could endanger lives

Source (http://www.cnn.com/2007/WORLD/meast/04/28/iraq.harry.ap/index.html)

I don't understand why he MUST go? If there's a threat against him, then either keep him home, or send him and shut up about it. Media hype. Utter rubbish.

[graflok]

This September Harry will reach that ever-popular, oh-so-occult age of 23.

His birthday is Sept 15, a few days before "Mabon" on Sept 21, one of the illuminati's human sacrifice nights.

ref:
http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n1796.cfm


graflok

[tinmenace]

Right! I've always thought that he would be sacrificed, but what annoys me so much is that they advertise it in the media.

"Come all ye bloodthirsty lizards, and join us in celebration of our beloved Harry's sacrifice on the hallowed grounds of Babylon!!"

It's almost like that! An announcement.

Makes me so sick.... :(

[siliconpsychosis]

It feels to me as if the media have been preparing people for Harrys assassination.

First we have the case of (deliberately) kidnapped British Navy personnel. ( With Fay Turney 'selling her story to the media' scandal thrown in, to deter people from questioning the official story.) This incident reminded people of the risks of war. 'Wow. It really is dangerous being a soldier' )

Then we had an increase of British casualties in Iraq. Magic 11 fatalities so far in April )

One of which happened to be a friend of Prince William. Therefore people started thinking, 'Oh my God! Even the Royals know people dying in Iraq. )

Then Prince William splits up with Kate Middleton. People think 'Poor old William! Lost a friend in Iraq and now he has no girlfriend. Bad luck always comes in threes!'

And then we have the destruction of a Challenger 2 tank, the first time ever in Iraq! Harry too will be in an armoured vehicle. People think 'Harry's vehicle won't be as solid as a challenger 2 tank. Bombs would easily take his vehicle out! )

Earlier this week a British soldier was shot dead in Basra. Guess what he was doing? He was providing top cover for a Warrior armoured personnel carrier on a routine patrol. This required him to have his head out of the hatch to act as the eyes and ears of the patrol leaving him vulnerable to attack by gunmen. Harrys role perhaps?

A possible scenario for Prince Harry, aged 22? With fingers pointing at Iran as the perpetrator? Don't bet against it.

A political motive and ritual sacrifice rolled into one spectacular Lizard (slimy) orgasm.

[mada88]

How are the insurgence (is that how you spell black opps?) going to reconize him in all his army gear? Its not as if hes going to wear anything different from the other troops. This is all bread and circuses anyways.

[siliconpsychosis]

Well I personally doubt unsurgents will kill Harry. In my opinion the British forces will have snipers covering his every movement, to 'protect him'. You only need 1 of them to be a trained assassin to do the job for them. Harry provides top cover, assassin blows his brains out. Dead royal. Easy peezy.

[mk72]

Hi guys I'm new. I would be surprised if Harry doesn't get killed. The media has been going on and on about it for a month now, there is a definite hype, America and England are loosing support back home on the war and they still want to invade Iran, and from what I understand it will be big and ugly so they need a sacrifice they need support and they need the public to be in shock so that they can focus everybody's attention on that and go ahead with their plans. Who would ever believe they sacrificed the third in line to the throne of England. All the conspiracy theorists will look more crazy than ever. I do think they will first say that he was taken hostage to drag the media frenzy out more.
Hope my english is okay, not my first language

[hagbard_celine]

It is highly possible Prince Harry will be used as a 'sacrifice' to their 'gods'. I hope not, I like him - he has his mother's spirit - but the royal family has a tendancy to get rid of people don't they? If this is what they have in mind for Harry, then sending him to Iraq (Babylon) is probably part of the setting up of the ritual. If anything happens to Harry, just like Diana's death, WHERE he dies and the NUMEROLOGY involved will be very significant. They tend to do these rituals in style with lots of symbolism, so Ellis Taylor's site will be the one to watch for updates on this situation should it occur.

Hopefully it won't - Lets bombard this situation with lots of positive energy in the hope we can prevent it. Any time we can thwart their plans shows solidarity, and gives them a clear message we will not tolerate this crap anymore.


Good idea. :D :)

I think you're right there about Harry. His life is in danger, but it's not the Iraqis he needs to worry about, it's the Prouty's behind his back on "our side".
If he's James Hewitt's kid then it makes him expendable. And what better place to carry out a sacrifice than Babylon!

[earthseed]

Bet he's wishing he didn't come from an affair his bloodline must not be pure enough...ritual sacrifice.

[synergy777]

imagine the fall out, remember the scenes after diana. what a great way to gain support for a national draft.go and get even for the death of harry. ignorant masses roll up, go die for queen and country, like good little toy soldiers.

[truthseeker1980]

I have thought since i first saw the news report that he was going to be sent, that it is just a ploy to start WW3 properly.

The SAS will more than likely wipe him out, then the whole country will mourn and the puppets will say we have to send more troops in to stand up against the so called bad insurgence.

I can see it now, i bet it will happen on 07/07/07.

Mind you if enough of us on here start talking as we are and mention things like this then maybe it wont happen.

I was thinkng the other day, about the staged hostage situation with Iran, it was exposed on here as quick as it happened and that maybe the reason it concluded so quickly, because they monitor this site and thought that there were too many people who knew the real score and couldn't attack Iran yet, i dunno maybe, or maybe not.

The more we talk about it, the more scared they are going to get though.

[father ted]

The more we talk about it, the more scared they are going to get though.

Yeah, so don't be chicken shit, join the forum and start posting:)

[synergy777]

me, cruise and true lilly on the old forum had decent thread going, then the website crashed. i also posted the date, march 23rd on this forum, and was pretty bang on. the date may 3rd, beltane, as goro adachi has pointed out, is half time from 911 to 2012. march 23 rd, if you look at the historic events, had plenty of interesting things happening. i think they need either israel to attack syria/iran, or another prs/911. as america, uk have been throughly outclasssed,compare the naval hostage situation to guantanmo. the prisoners are held in modern day concentration camps, no legal process, no compliance to any international law, human rights, geneva conventions. in fact blair/bush should be in jail, they started two illegal wars, are using nukes(depleted uranuim) etc, like orwell said, "some animals are more equal than others."

they monitor the sites, but do they really change the plans, come on, hitler said it best, when talking about the sheep, "leaders are lucky, the people do not think".

[albie]

If he doesn't die, will that change your view of all this?

[synergy777]

personally he is i my opinion, not pure bloodline(hewitt), so they could if they wanted to, sacrifice him, why not sacrifce him on a occult date, like august 31, like they did his mother. who knows what they think, but know this everything is justified, aslong as it helps their agenda.

there are many theories, the antichrist/mervo line ending up with william, the last days/armageddon, the pnac objective,morals and dogma, pikes letter, the protocols, swfsw . even if these documents are edited, they certainly do correlate with real events.

personally, iran/palestine, are my major concerns, these are the lands of my ancestors, its starting to get personal.some peole are educated about their heritage, others are lost. those that know, start to see how the jigsaw fits.

people in india/pakistan etc are already being contaminated due to the west wonderful enlightned nuking of the middle east, you may have no respect for your soldiers health (gulf war syndrome, mutant babies, shit hospitals to look after injured troops) the du is now in your atomosphere(europe), halliburton are monitoring it, nature's winds.

[lenejento]

Does it matter if Harry is a kid of Charles or not? They sacrifice their own sometimes too, don't they? It would only be more powerful. I am also open to the possibility that this is ONLY a media hype to have an excuse to carry on the war on Iraq, but if someone connected to Iran kills him, this could create an excuse to attack Iran.

Personally, I think Harry looks alot like his father, this is because of the eyes sitting very close together on both, and isn't this quite a rare feature? Hewitt has normal space between his eyes.

What exacly did Arizona say about William again? I'm probably off track here but I got the impression that he is more important than Harry, even though William has a different father? :confused:

I don't know, this is all quite confusing to me right now :o

Keep up the good work.