Ann Coulter: Take away womens right to vote

[chris]

http://thinkprogress.org/2007/10/04/coulter-gardner/

Ann Coulter’s Disastrous Political Strategy: ‘Take Away Women’s Right To Vote’

Earlier this week, Ann Coulter told The New York Observer that she believes women shouldn’t have the right to vote:
If we took away women’s right to vote, we’d never have to worry about another Democrat president. It’s kind of a pipe dream, it’s a personal fantasy of mine, but I don’t think it’s going to happen. And it is a good way of making the point that women are voting so stupidly, at least single women.
It also makes the point, it is kind of embarrassing, the Democratic Party ought to be hanging its head in shame, that it has so much difficulty getting men to vote for it. I mean, you do see it’s the party of women and “We’ll pay for health care and tuition and day care — and here, what else can we give you, soccer moms?”
Sigh. Where to begin?
If we were to subscribe to Ms. Coulter’s theory — that single women be left out of the political process — and further assume that given the leading GOP presidential candidates decision to skip Hispanic and African American forums, those Americans be left out as well, we could very well believe that conservatives want the elections decided by married white men.
Let’s hope that’s not true.
The fact is that anyone seeking elected office ignores unmarried Americans at their peril. With each passing year, America is becoming more unmarried. One in four voters is a single woman. It is the marriage gap — not the gender gap or income gap — that will decide the 2008 election.
Fifty percent of all households are now headed by an unmarried person; single women comprise most of them. And whatever predispositions anyone had about who single Americans, they are not what they used to be. They are separated, divorced, widowed and now make up the majority of women. 50 million total.
And while a clear majority of unmarrieds are white, they are considerably more racially diverse than married adults. More than a quarter of unmarried Americans are Latino or African-American. These 50 million Americans — who are more likely not to have health care, are economically stressed, and are solely responsible for their child’s care — have more at stake in this election than their married counterparts.
Ms. Coulter may be a provocateur but a political strategist she is not.
– Page Gardner

Stupid biatch

[chris]

Maybe she has said this to boost the Hilary vote...

[intruder]

search "youtube" for; "Ann Coulter gets owned".

Here SHE is telling a Canadian journalist that Canada was in Viet Nam. It's TOO hilarious..when he corrects her, she says "I think you're wrong..I'll get back to you on that!" What about all those American draft dodgers that came to Canada Ann!?! But that's Mann Coulter for ya'!!!
If you look closely in this video, you just may be able to spot her Adam's apple, which could be the reason she wants to take away a woman's right to vote. She's a freaky bitch that's for sure. She also thinks the bombing of Iran would be "fun".

Let's start a poll!!!

Ann Coulter? transgendered? Y/N

I give her a hearty YES!!!!

Mann!!!

[28th kingdom]

Coulter is a mind slave.

[chris]

search "youtube" for; "Ann Coulter gets owned".

Here SHE is telling a Canadian journalist that Canada was in Viet Nam. It's TOO hilarious..when he corrects her, she says "I think you're wrong..I'll get back to you on that!" What about all those American draft dodgers that came to Canada Ann!?! But that's Mann Coulter for ya'!!!
If you look closely in this video, you just may be able to spot her Adam's apple, which could be the reason she wants to take away a woman's right to vote. She's a freaky bitch that's for sure. She also thinks the bombing of Iran would be "fun".

Let's start a poll!!!

Ann Coulter? transgendered? Y/N

I give her a hearty YES!!!!

Mann!!!

lol, she's been living in her neocon world far too long where strong opinions count more than little facts.

[geo2]

http://img337.imageshack.us/img337/1110/acfebse1.jpg (http://imageshack.us)


The White House Press Corps is delighted that their colleagues at TIME magazine, remembering Ann Coulter’s gratuitous "that old Arab" insult against the dear lady Helen Thomas, finally conned the transsexual drag queen, a.k.a. Arthur Coltrane of Pickens County, Georgia, former scion, before his sex-change operation, of an old Southern hog-farming family.
http://www.conspiracyplanet.com/channel.cfm?channelid=104&contentid=2122

[revolutionary_jam]

she's mental!

I bet if she wasn't so good looking she wouldn't have such a successful career

[tinmenace]

Coulter is a mind slave.


Totally.

A kneecap with hair, and completely controlled by the reptilian brain which is located somewhere deep inside her ass.

[strider]

Totally.

A kneecap with hair, and completely controlled by the reptilian brain which is located somewhere deep inside her ass.







:D

[soglad]

Totally.

A kneecap with hair, and completely controlled by the reptilian brain which is located somewhere deep inside her ass.







For lack of kinder words! hehe

[auron]

Maybe she has said this to boost the Hilary vote...
Just what i was thinking. Classic Problem - Reaction - Solution. :D

[byrdsmaniac]

I don't think anyone should be allowed to vote.
Oh wait. I forgot.
Just because we get to vote doesn't mean that it counts for anything.
So everyone should be allowed to vote, since it doesn't matter anyway.

[auron]

The whole voting system is a joke anyway!!

Whoever is in the White House next, will be following orders from the exact same people that the present President is now!!

End of rant.. :D

[chris]

Just what i was thinking. Classic Problem - Reaction - Solution. :D

They've spent years building up the Republican Woman, pro war, pro bush, pro Israel, pro opinion over facts and anti liberal. It wouldn't surprise me if all these neocon bimbo's start loosing their jobs and are replaced by old haggared hacks or that it suddenly becomes more balanced on the democrat front and people like Michelle Malkin takes her neocon bimbos to the neoliberal side. Coulter might just be the start of the republican woman alienation.

[mynameis]

She knows as a man, she can still vote.

[tinmenace]

Here are some photos of a this Shape-Shifter.
She's ACTUALLY a real live fucking KNEECAP pretending to be a human female.

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/annonleft.JPG
Ann on the right :eek:

Aerosmith - Dude (looks like a lady) - YouTube

Ann, before the wig....

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/anncoulterdad.jpg




Ann, before the mask....

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/anncoulter.jpg



Completed facade...

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/ann-bigcock.jpg


Ann, the rest of the time...

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/anncoultermom.jpg

[strider]

I don't know who the fuck she (he) is, but she gives me the creeps big time, simply by looking at a pic of her...

[tinmenace]

She knows as a man, she can still vote.

ROFL...Yeah, she has one HELLUVA Adam's Apple, doesn't she?

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/annadamapple.jpg

[baron von lotsov]

she's mental!

I bet if she wasn't so good looking she wouldn't have such a successful career



Yes but actually two points. If she were mental then that might strengthen her argument! Second I don't think she is as mental as most people think. I mean you lot have been brainwashed with feminism and woman's rights.

In the past the man was the head of the household. He was the breadwinner and the security to the family. He would pay the bills, fend off outside threats and care for his wife. If his wife were not happy then it would be his concern. This is his natural role and the woman's natural role is the softer kind of stuff, making the dinner, looking after the children, keeping the house looking clean and tidy and so on.

Politics was a man's world and it is a tough one. By exposing women to this it causes them to become masculinised, and quite frankly freaks of nature. You can see this today as they wear trousers and suits. They are not fooling anyone though, they are not real men and should get away from this communist propaganda, but of course the only people who can really look after them and protect them are the ones they have being brainwashed into despising. The result of giving the right for women to vote has actually played right into the hands of the elite. This woman is not as thick as you would believe, indeed quite sensible in fact.

[strider]

Yes but actually two points. If she were mental then that might strengthen her argument! Second I don't think she is as mental as most people think. I mean you lot have been brainwashed with feminism and woman's rights.

In the past the man was the head of the household. He was the breadwinner and the security to the family. He would pay the bills, fend off outside threats and care for his wife. If his wife were not happy then it would be his concern. This is his natural role and the woman's natural role is the softer kind of stuff, making the dinner, looking after the children, keeping the house looking clean and tidy and so on.

Politics was a man's world and it is a tough one. By exposing women to this it causes them to become masculinised, and quite frankly freaks of nature. You can see this today as they wear trousers and suits. They are not fooling anyone though, they are not real men and should get away from this communist propaganda, but of course the only people who can really look after them and protect them are the ones they have being brainwashed into despising. The result of giving the right for women to vote has actually played right into the hands of the elite. This woman is not as thick as you would believe, indeed quite sensible in fact.

A very very big and over exaggerated yawn.................................

[tinmenace]

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/godless.jpg

Ann's book that she released on 6/6/6

What a transparent doofus.

[baron von lotsov]

A very very big and over exaggerated yawn.................................


A typical unthinking and rude response.

[tinmenace]

Ann and her equally brain-dead buddy, Sean Hannity

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/annandsean.jpg

[tinmenace]

Yes but actually two points. If she were mental then that might strengthen her argument! Second I don't think she is as mental as most people think. I mean you lot have been brainwashed with feminism and woman's rights.

In the past the man was the head of the household. He was the breadwinner and the security to the family. He would pay the bills, fend off outside threats and care for his wife. If his wife were not happy then it would be his concern. This is his natural role and the woman's natural role is the softer kind of stuff, making the dinner, looking after the children, keeping the house looking clean and tidy and so on.

Politics was a man's world and it is a tough one. By exposing women to this it causes them to become masculinised, and quite frankly freaks of nature. You can see this today as they wear trousers and suits. They are not fooling anyone though, they are not real men and should get away from this communist propaganda, but of course the only people who can really look after them and protect them are the ones they have being brainwashed into despising. The result of giving the right for women to vote has actually played right into the hands of the elite. This woman is not as thick as you would believe, indeed quite sensible in fact.



That's an insult to the good and positive male energies. Politics and cut-throat aggression, and the "survival-provide-for-the-family" is a reptilian brain thing, not a male thing.

[strider]

A typical unthinking and rude response.

Yup, I would agree.......

[baron von lotsov]

That's an insult to the good and positive male energies. Politics and cut-throat aggression, and the "survival-provide-for-the-family" is a reptilian brain thing, not a male thing.








Really. You are saying I'm reptilian now are you? What is a positive male energy if it is not caring for a wife and children and setting standards and taking responsibility?

[baron von lotsov]

Yup, I would agree.......



So are you going to do anything about it? Maybe by saying something that differentiates you from some kind of monkey.

[tinmenace]

Really. You are saying I'm reptilian now are you? What is a positive male energy if it is not caring for a wife and children and setting standards and taking responsibility?

I wasn't calling you anything. Interesting that you identified yourself with that description, though.

But, to answer your question, it all depends on how ruthless you are. Do you trample other people to get ahead "to provide for your family"?

[strider]

Really. You are saying I'm reptilian now are you? What is a positive male energy if it is not caring for a wife and children and setting standards and taking responsibility?

God, these yawns just get longer and longer....

[baron von lotsov]

I wasn't calling you anything. Interesting that you identified yourself with that description, though.

But, to answer your question, it all depends on how ruthless you are. Do you trample other people to get ahead "to provide for your family"?






Nope. But I was not saying that, I was saying that there are people out there who do and it needs a man to stand up to them. If the woman lets the fraudster in for a cup of tea because she was won over by trickery then how is that going to benefit the family? I'm saying a woman is not capable of doing a man's job and thinking she is she is neglecting her own job and role in society. The result is broken families and dysfunctional youth. Now who would be behind that scam do you think?

[strider]

Nope. But I was not saying that, I was saying that there are people out there who do and it needs a man to stand up to them. If the woman lets the fraudster in for a cup of tea because she was won over by trickery then how is that going to benefit the family? I'm saying a woman is not capable of doing a man's job and thinking she is she is neglecting her own job and role in society. The result is broken families and dysfunctional youth. Now who would be behind that scam do you think?

Jesus and his rubber twat bomb.. I just had to check the calendar to make sure I wasn't living in the 1830's..

By the way, do you need a replacement for your cave man club?

[mynameis]

So are you going to do anything about it? Maybe by saying something that differentiates you from some kind of monkey.

Reported for baiting.

[soglad]

Jesus and his rubber twat bomb.. I just had to check the calendar to make sure I wasn't living in the 1830's..

By the way, do you need a replacement for your cave man club?

Shut up and get back in the coal mine!

[strider]

So are you going to do anything about it? Maybe by saying something that differentiates you from some kind of monkey.

O.k. here goes...... (big drum roll, lasting a minute of longer)

I'm.....................not................a...... .............monkey..

Does that help your inane depressive comments?

Go and watch blue peter, I heard they swapped their dog once and a child found out and wept. Does that count?

[snoopsnuffleopagus]

I bet if she wasn't so good looking she wouldn't have such a successful career

Cordial Felicitations Revolutionary_Jam:

With all due respect to your discernment, it disturbs me that you deem Coulter as 'Good Lookin'.

Yeesh!

As a Life-Long Artist, I enjoy all Beauty; Physical, Internal, Natural, Man-Made. There are certain Aesthetics; Lines & Proportions that please me more than others.

As a Man, I do enjoy the Visage of tight black mini skirts, long legs and curves in all the right places.

The 'Hatchet Faced', Rat Eyed Countenance of M/ann Coulter inspires me to vomit, and to AVERT my view of her Visage as much as Humanly Possible.

Coulters obnoxious and idiotic values, mores, judgements and statements rise to the surface to create a Visage of a Medusa. Hideous!

Beauty arises from within, all the rest is window dressing.

Cordial Felicitations: Snoopsnuffleopagus

[tinmenace]

Nope. But I was not saying that, I was saying that there are people out there who do and it needs a man to stand up to them. If the woman lets the fraudster in for a cup of tea because she was won over by trickery then how is that going to benefit the family?

[Suggesting of course that she has no intelligence or discernment, because she's a woman. Which century are you living in?]


I'm saying a woman is not capable of doing a man's job and thinking she is she is neglecting her own job and role in society.

[Yikes :eek: ]

The result is broken families and dysfunctional youth. Now who would be behind that scam do you think?

[Broken families and dysfunctional youth are the result of the woman not doing her job or duty? :rolleyes: Say, who decides what a woman's duty and function is? ]





Wow!

Well, you're trapped in a very old 3D perception of the world. Nothing I say at this point can penetrate the thick layers of indoctrination oppressing you. So, I won't try.

All I'll say is that things are changing quite rapidly now, and I'm sure that you are feeling the pinch too. People like you are going to have the worst time in the next few years, if you don't release your regimented belief system.

But, that's your choice. Don't say I didn't warn you.

[strider]

Shut up and get back in the coal mine!

Sorry Dad, I didn't realise you were watching..

Shall I bring some logs home?

[soglad]

Sorry Dad, I didn't realise you were watching..

Shall I bring some logs home?

Yes, chop 'em up good or there'll be no supper for you! :mad:

[chris]

What Baron is saying is very true. I'm all for women going out and doing well for themselves in whatever way they want but the career woman is just the same as the enslaved man who is indoctrinated to believe that the work they are doing is not slavery. Women venturing into this world is not progress, it means that we need two people working fulltime to afford things that it only used to take one person. As Russo said, this breaks up the families as the children are raised by the state and television.

Back when the man went out to work, the woman could have worked also for material objects but most chose not to as they took raising their children as of greater importance.

He's not saying 'woman do my dishes,' he's saying that the household was more productive when there wasn't so much pressure for material objects.

[mynameis]

On this note, I would point out the discrepancy of the falling birth rates with this logic.

What Baron is saying is very true. I'm all for women going out and doing well for themselves in whatever way they want but the career woman is just the same as the enslaved man who is indoctrinated to believe that the work they are doing is not slavery. Women venturing into this world is not progress, it means that we need two people working fulltime to afford things that it only used to take one person. As Russo said, this breaks up the families as the children are raised by the state and television.

Back when the man went out to work, the woman could have worked also for material objects but most chose not to as they took raising their children as of greater importance.

He's not saying 'woman do my dishes,' he's saying that the household was more productive when there wasn't so much pressure for material objects.

[baron von lotsov]

Wow!

Well, you're trapped in a very old 3D perception of the world. Nothing I say at this point can penetrate the thick layers of indoctrination oppressing you. So, I won't try.

All I'll say is that things are changing quite rapidly now, and I'm sure that you are feeling the pinch too. People like you are going to have the worst time in the next few years, if you don't release your regimented belief system.

But, that's your choice. Don't say I didn't warn you.





Ah yes things are changing rapidly now and who is making them change? Who is backing the feminists? I'll remind you they were originally funded by the CIA and not to forget the Rockefeller Foundation. Please do your homework and get back to me with a more informed view.

[mynameis]

This does not counter the fact that she's using her spiel for political maneuvering against women voters. It's an unseen effect that she would try to eliminate votes of women, who are mostly liberal and progressive, women who identify with dogface Clinton.


Ah yes things are changing rapidly now and who is making them change? Who is backing the feminists? I'll remind you they were originally funded by the CIA and not to forget the Rockefeller Foundation. Please do your homework and get back to me with a more informed view.

[baron von lotsov]

What Baron is saying is very true. I'm all for women going out and doing well for themselves in whatever way they want but the career woman is just the same as the enslaved man who is indoctrinated to believe that the work they are doing is not slavery. Women venturing into this world is not progress, it means that we need two people working fulltime to afford things that it only used to take one person. As Russo said, this breaks up the families as the children are raised by the state and television.

Back when the man went out to work, the woman could have worked also for material objects but most chose not to as they took raising their children as of greater importance.

He's not saying 'woman do my dishes,' he's saying that the household was more productive when there wasn't so much pressure for material objects.


Thanks. That is what I'm saying and it is a conspiracy, the more you look in to it the more sense it makes as far as elite objectives go. Funny how the woman had so much more time for the family 100 years ago. Industry was probably only 10% as efficient back then and we work longer hours now. What kind of work is it they give these women to do anyway?

[baron von lotsov]

This does not counter the fact that she's using her spiel for political maneuvering against women voters. It's an unseen effect that she would try to eliminate votes of women, who are mostly liberal and progressive, women who identify with dogface Clinton.



She's a politician and a former lawyer. I suspect the epitome of what she is against. It takes one to know one and you often find some of the people involved with a particular elite project are the most informed and the most against it. At NO2ID we get a lot of former civil servants and even the police backing us.

[raginggran]

Ah my dear Baron

100 years ago, Women were not human beings under the law and could not vote.. Is that your view?

As for what women did 100 years ago, how about homesteading in Canada, helping her husband clear land, build sod huts, haveing 12 children in the wilderness, cooking, cleaning the game (which she shot), caring for her family along side of her husband.

This couple emigrated to Canada because she was an Irish servant and he was an upperclass Englishman...

Now we are equal under the law and can vote.. I for one will fight for my right and my granddaughters right to be a human being.

[baron von lotsov]

Someone is trying to get me banned on here. They can't handle the truth so I will not be posting any more on this thread.

Sorry guys, you self censor yourself.

[soglad]

Someone is trying to get me banned on here.

Ah c'mon now Baron.....a SLIGHT bit over-reactive?

[tinmenace]

Ah yes things are changing rapidly now and who is making them change? Who is backing the feminists? I'll remind you they were originally funded by the CIA and not to forget the Rockefeller Foundation. Please do your homework and get back to me with a more informed view.



I didn't say anything about feminism. Did I? I didn't even imply it.

What I'm talking about is not even in the same ballpark as what you're talking about...CIA, Rockefeller....that's fucking old news. I've moved beyond that.

You're the one that needs to do some catching up, so that you can comprehend what I'm talking about when I say that this is all a 3D trap, perpetuated by rigid thinkers such as yourself.

Will you answer me one question please? Which of David's books have you read and comprehended?

[julieray]

Here are some photos of a this Shape-Shifter.
She's ACTUALLY a real live fucking KNEECAP pretending to be a human female.

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/annonleft.JPG
Ann on the right :eek:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbsBJmx-m2s

Ann, before the wig....

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/anncoulterdad.jpg




Ann, before the mask....

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/anncoulter.jpg



Completed facade...

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/ann-bigcock.jpg


Ann, the rest of the time...

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/anncoultermom.jpg






That is an insult to that horse's arse!!:D

[soglad]

HAHAHAH!

That post made me LOL big time!!

Ah, good oul' Mann Coulter (note the "m").....always good for a cheap laugh...

[tinmenace]

That is an insult to that horse's arse!!:D



Right you are! :D

[chris]

Thanks. That is what I'm saying and it is a conspiracy, the more you look in to it the more sense it makes as far as elite objectives go. Funny how the woman had so much more time for the family 100 years ago. Industry was probably only 10% as efficient back then and we work longer hours now. What kind of work is it they give these women to do anyway?

Baron you sexist dinosaur, get with it! Women have just as much right to be enslaved as men:eek:

[strider]

Yes, chop 'em up good or there'll be no supper for you! :mad:

Sorry I'm late, my axe is blunt and the bloody horse won't start...

I have coal...

And meat...

And a wife who looks very much like my sister..

P.s. Should I hit that strange looking person who keeps looking at me funny?

[soglad]

and the bloody horse won't start...



http://aycu25.webshots.com/image/28824/2002347419380496648_rs.jpg

[strider]

http://aycu25.webshots.com/image/28824/2002347419380496648_rs.jpg

Don't laugh, it's your bloody horse..

I don't see the fun in this, I'm off to eat a portion of chips with gravy, seeing as I am a true north eastener, blah blah.. These southerners eh!

[auron]

Sorry I'm late, my axe is blunt and the bloody horse won't start...

I have coal...

And meat...

And a wife who looks very much like my sister..

P.s. Should I hit that strange looking person who keeps looking at me funny?



http://aycu25.webshots.com/image/28824/2002347419380496648_rs.jpg

[tinmenace]

Coulter: We want 'Jews to be perfected'

WASHINGTON (CNN) – Conservative commentator and best-selling author Ann Coulter may find herself in the midst of a controversy for comments Monday suggesting America would be better if everyone was Christian.

Asked by CNBC host Donny Deutsch what the U.S. looks like in her dreams, Coulter said it would look like the Republican National Convention in 2004

"People were happy,” she said, according to a transcript provided to CNN by CNBC. “They're Christian. They're tolerant. They defend America."

When Deutsch responded, "It would be better if we were all Christian?" Coulter said "Yeah."

Deutsch, himself Jewish, continued to press Coulter on her remarks, asking, "We should just throw Judaism away and we should all be Christians then?"

"Yeah," Coulter responded, adding "Well, it's a lot easier. It's kind of a fast track."

"You can't possibly believe that," Deutsch responded. “You can’t possibly. You’re too educated.”

"Do you know what Christianity is?" Coulter replied. "See, we believe your religion, but you have to obey. We have the fast track program."

Later in the interview Deutsch asked Coulter if she doesn't want any Jews in the world, Coulter responded, "No, we think — we just want Jews to be perfected, as they say."

"Wow, you didn't really say that, did you," Deutsch said.

Source (http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/)







:rolleyes:

[freedomnonfighter]

Here are some photos of a this Shape-Shifter.
She's ACTUALLY a real live fucking KNEECAP pretending to be a human female.

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/annonleft.JPG
Ann on the right :eek:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GbsBJmx-m2s

Ann, before the wig....

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/anncoulterdad.jpg




Ann, before the mask....

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/anncoulter.jpg



Completed facade...

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/ann-bigcock.jpg


Ann, the rest of the time...

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/anncoultermom.jpg








http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/1886/aelaughingatyouhc3.gifhttp://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/2/3D_emoticon_40.gifhttp://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/3/3D_emoticon_S146.gifhttp://img234.imageshack.us/img234/6205/goaltw7.gif

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Greatest - Post - Ever.

[tinmenace]

http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/1886/aelaughingatyouhc3.gifhttp://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/2/3D_emoticon_40.gifhttp://www.lifeshore.com/smiley/data/media/3/3D_emoticon_S146.gifhttp://img234.imageshack.us/img234/6205/goaltw7.gif

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Greatest - Post - Ever.



http://i210.photobucket.com/albums/bb48/Belliton/3dancingmooning.gif

[lookfar]

I don't know who the fuck she (he) is, but she gives me the creeps big time, simply by looking at a pic of her...

LOL, yeah I totally agree strider - very creepy indeed :eek: Defo looks transgender to me (not that that's a problem in itself of course, each to their own & all that:rolleyes:), but it is on this particular subject matter!!:eek:

[baron von lotsov]

http://i210.photobucket.com/albums/bb48/Belliton/3dancingmooning.gif









Grow up.

[tinmenace]

Grow up.

Why?

[pollock]

So, you too can be boring and square!

F

[tinmenace]

So, you too can be boring and square!

F

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/trolls/box.jpg

Square? You mean so that I can fit into HIS box?
HIS version of what HE thinks I should be? :eek:

Yes, I think you're right.

But, erm....it ain't ever gonna happen. ;)

[tiswas]

She is a darling of the Jewish Task Force, which is a complete Zionist group.

[tinmenace]

She is a darling of the Jewish Task Force, which is a complete Zionist group.

Yeah, I think she's mind-controlled. She always has that deer-caught-in-headlights look in her eyes.