View Full Version : The Courts Part 1
mark1963
04-04-2010, 10:49 PM
This is a really good video.
It shows the Admiralty/Strawman scam for what it is:
http://www.youtube.com/profile?gl=US&user=TheBrotherhoodCircle#p/u/6/Xz2sVcWus9Y
Trusts are what it is really about, more simple than contracts and oh so sneaky.
Do you have any evidence to suggest that courts are run under admiralty law? (apart from this excellent video of course)
asky
stinker
05-04-2010, 06:55 PM
Do you have any evidence to suggest that courts are run under admiralty law? (apart from this excellent video of course)
asky
I can't believe people are STILL talking about this Admiralty law nonsense. Surely it's been thoroughly debunked in a way understandable for non lawyers somewhere? I remember someone that posts here, asking me to look into it years ago, and I sent him back chapter and verse on why it was untrue and that he was being led astray.
Which leads me to think that someone somewhere is benefitting from peddling this stuff. Which leaves me two questions, who is benefiting and how are they benefiting?
mark1963
09-04-2010, 03:43 PM
I can't believe people are STILL talking about this Admiralty law nonsense. Surely it's been thoroughly debunked in a way understandable for non lawyers somewhere? I remember someone that posts here, asking me to look into it years ago, and I sent him back chapter and verse on why it was untrue and that he was being led astray.
Which leads me to think that someone somewhere is benefitting from peddling this stuff. Which leaves me two questions, who is benefiting and how are they benefiting?
Admiralty, Civil, Roman, Equity - it all means the same for the average defendant - they are fucked and it's sycophants like tou that perpetuate this unfairness.
stinker
09-04-2010, 06:15 PM
Admiralty, Civil, Roman, Equity - it all means the same for the average defendant - they are fucked and it's sycophants like tou that perpetuate this unfairness.
I can understand you not liking the court system. However, this Admiralty thing is just plain untrue. The sooner people start challenging things for what they are and not what they aren't, the better.
Calling people names doesn't make this Admiralty thing true either.
mark1963
09-04-2010, 08:53 PM
I can understand you not liking the court system. However, this Admiralty thing is just plain untrue. The sooner people start challenging things for what they are and not what they aren't, the better.
Calling people names doesn't make this Admiralty thing true either.
And you saying is isn't doesn't either.
karl j
09-04-2010, 11:02 PM
I can't believe people are STILL talking about this Admiralty law nonsense. Surely it's been thoroughly debunked in a way understandable for non lawyers somewhere? I remember someone that posts here, asking me to look into it years ago, and I sent him back chapter and verse on why it was untrue and that he was being led astray.
Which leads me to think that someone somewhere is benefitting from peddling this stuff. Which leaves me two questions, who is benefiting and how are they benefiting?
Seeing as you already have the evidence please post it for all of us being led astray to review and be educated.... thanks in advance of your post...
stinker
11-04-2010, 11:36 AM
Seeing as you already have the evidence please post it for all of us being led astray to review and be educated.... thanks in advance of your post...
I put something together and sent it to someone who posts on here via pm on the Illusions Forum on the Law of the Flag and Strawmen etc. With the demise of that forum, it's lost to me, although he may have a copy. Looking at this forum, I suppose I should do it again. However, condensing everything into an understandable document took bleddy ages, and I'm not sure if there would be any point. I'll have a ponder on that one.
With that in mind, one question before I invest any time in it, would there ever be any type of information that would satisfy you? For instance, there's no point me referring to law if you wont accept that as a reference.