View Full Version : Car Radio tapping.
danrayson
03-04-2010, 07:57 AM
This is going to sound crazy, but the car radio talked to me two days ago. Whenever I talked back (yes, I did that) they stopped transmission, and whenever I finished replying a cheering sound came on while they figured out a responce. They were telling me not to drink and drive, take drugs, etc. At the start of the "conversation" they told me I was on the radio and to answer truthfully. They then asked probing questions about my personal activities, I replied truthfully.
Do the police have this ability now? Damn cruel way of keeping it undercover. Perhaps it was a perverted song they played on whichever station I was tuned into, who knows, it's still sending me crazy. I asked for their formal name, and they refused to answer. They repsonded to my other outputs as if they had video feed and audio feed from my driving seat.
It was done in such a way that the normal drug user, even normal person, would have simply taken it as a hillusination. Unforunately for them I have little doubt that they would employ such tactics. I have also NEVER hillusinated before, and am firm in my belief that this was staged.
I hope others have heard of experiences like this.
ps. I live in the UK, staffordshire.
pps. Any responce would be appreciated, regardless of motives.
http://www.freedomfchs.com/
they have microwave hearing effect ...they like to fool you into believe the sound coming from your pc,tv,radio etc.....its Done by RADAR
Microwave auditory effect - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The microwave auditory effect, also known as the microwave hearing effect or the Frey effect, consists of audible clicks induced by pulsed/modulated microwave frequencies. The clicks are generated directly inside the human head without the need of any receiving electronic device. The effect was first reported by persons working in the vicinity of radar transponders during World War II. These induced sounds are not audible to other people nearby. The microwave auditory effect was later discovered to be inducible with shorter-wavelength portions of the electromagnetic spectrum. During the Cold War era, the American neuroscientist Allan H. Frey studied this phenomenon and was the first to publish (Journal of Applied Physiology, Vol. 17, pages 689-692, 1962) information on the nature of the microwave auditory effect; this effect is therefore also known as the Frey effect.
Dr. Don R. Justesen published "Microwaves and Behavior" in The American Psychologist (Volume 30, March 1975, Number 3).
Research by NASA in the 1970s[citation needed] showed that this effect occurs as a result of thermal expansion of parts of the human ear around the cochlea, even at low power density. Later, signal modulation was found to produce sounds or words that appeared to originate intracranially. It was studied for its possible use in communications. Similar research conducted in the USSR studied its use in non-lethal weaponry.[citation needed]
The existence of non-lethal weaponry that exploits the microwave auditory effect appears to have been classified "Secret NOFORN" in the USA from (at the latest) 1998, until the declassification on 6 December 2006 of "Bioeffects of Selected Non-Lethal Weaponry" in response to a FOIA request.
The technology gained further public attention when a company announced in early 2008 that they were close to fielding a device called MEDUSA (Mob Excess Deterrent Using Silent Audio) based on the principle.[1]
its simliar idea to puting a speaker on to CCTV.....so an operator who sees odd behvior/supisus ect.. can act opon it......unfortunatly the equipment is illeagal , but by the looks of it has not stopped them testing it out, unfortunatly they lie and cover up what they done and make there test subject apear /sound crazy
again the same old bullshit "for the greater good" will one day save lives ect...
I bet you have no pervious signs of mental illness ect....voice came from no where etc.....
danrayson
03-04-2010, 08:27 AM
This is very disturbing. The fact that they can do this at all is disturbing in it self, but targetting specifically myself makes me worried even more so.
I also have suspision of there being a video recording device lodged into my windscreen, it may look similar to a crack to most, but upon closer inspection it appears that a small grey "something" is lodged into my windscreen. I talked directly to this feature when communicating with the affore-mentioned mental agressor.
The only reason I can think they would want to watch me specifically is because I have an IQ of 140+ and I am working on a theory that is of great significance to the world as a whole should I reach a provable solution. As to the short time they were actually communicating with me, it would be easy to spend an eight our shift doing this and talk to well over 20 people.
It appears I have to accept the fact that there really is the possibilty somebody is listening and watching, and I am in fact not going completely mad.
ps., just read your second post. I have a previous history of depression, but I stopped taking the drugs they gave me after two weeks and haven't needed to do it since. I have no other signs of mental weakness or infaculty.
yeah when this start its not unusaly to think some type of bug/hiden cam is doing it or some other near field device, then once you check for that and not found anything , you will think its some type of implant tooth, brian etc....But probadly Ther RADAR/satilite survalence remote view capability.
danrayson
03-04-2010, 08:40 AM
My primary concern is to find out if any one else has experienced strikingly similar happenings to me.
This alone would provide the evidence I need to justify breaking apart my windscreen to find if this camera thing is just the remnants of a smashed stone or it is a solid object.
I cannot stop the remote mind control, but I can never look up for certain. I'm expecting a second occurance. That may be niave, but I don't put it past them now they surely know that I know. They have text tracking all over this site for absolute sure.
I ended up smashng my home alram system , playstation, digtal tv box, I was convinced there were cams and stuff in them...but there was not and it made no difference....
Be careful as people around you will think you have gone mad and question your mental health.
I say this now as pyschirtist are convinced this is mental illness and that the internet feeds a person so called delusion, If you belive you need medical advice then seek it.....I am going to leave it there and let you make your own mind up.
danrayson
04-04-2010, 03:35 AM
My parents say "It MUST have been a psychotic episode" like that's the only way this can be explained. Like, uh, maybe someone was actually speaking to me, idiots. Even my own family cannot believe this can happen.
I want out from this country, I want to move to a place where they can only see me with sattelites if they're that bloomin' interested.
I need to get back to true liberty, where no one imposes their sick and twisted ideals onto you. This country, in my eyes, is now worse than Nazi Germany, anything could happen, we as a nation are watching that television and reading those newspapers so brainwashed that they could tell us walking off cliffs is good fun and we'd believe them.
Well, not me, Mr Politician.
joe911
04-04-2010, 03:46 AM
Just out of curiosity,what's so interesting about your life that would make 'them' want to spy on you?
[And I don't mean that in a condescending way]
danrayson
04-04-2010, 03:54 AM
Well first off, I am a follower of David Icke's beliefs majoritively speaking, which is reason in it self. I am also a theoretical physicist, and some of the ideas that have "flowed" into me recently have been of great success, and it's a matter of time before I find out if they're fallicious or correct.
I smoke marijuana on a regular basis, and drink very occasionally, the messages they were sending me were related to that. ie: They were telling me to "not drink and drive, don't take drugs, don't break the law" etc. Perhaps a way of trying to stop me doing these things and hense advocating them at a later date when people may be interested in who I am, having figured out the remainder of my multitude of theories.
I think that even if you're an insanely boring person, if you have the potential to change other people's opinions you're automatically watched very closely.
ufochick
04-04-2010, 05:00 AM
There is one way to tell, take a small battery operated tape recorder and carry it with you covertly, such as in a pocket if it begins again hit record. Later you will have proof that it did or did not happen.
danrayson
04-04-2010, 05:11 AM
Baring in mind that it may, so I'm told, be possible to remotely activate your audial cortex (whatever the real name is) it may be a pointless exercise to do so. However a dictophone is a good toy anyway so, there's no harm in potentially exposing them.
I doubt very much that I'd be able to acquire one without them having knowledge of me doing so if I am indeed being watched. After all, 20% of all CCTV cameras on the world are in the UK.
ufochick
04-04-2010, 11:03 AM
Baring in mind that it may, so I'm told, be possible to remotely activate your audial cortex (whatever the real name is) it may be a pointless exercise to do so. However a dictophone is a good toy anyway so, there's no harm in potentially exposing them.
I doubt very much that I'd be able to acquire one without them having knowledge of me doing so if I am indeed being watched. After all, 20% of all CCTV cameras on the world are in the UK.
Now don't play "yes but" ;)
It's still a good idea. I get cell calls when I am not in my own car and am somewhere unusual from my "handlers, trackers" where a woman speaks in a foreign voice for about 10 seconds. I have just learned to leave the phone at home. My cell is so old (and I use it very very little) they can't track me without calling me. I'd get one anyway and just leave it in your pocket with the mic pointed up. Use it for some mundane use then just carry it.
Now don't play "yes but" ;)
It's still a good idea. I get cell calls when I am not in my own car and am somewhere unusual from my "handlers, trackers" where a woman speaks in a foreign voice for about 10 seconds. I have just learned to leave the phone at home. My cell is so old (and I use it very very little) they can't track me without calling me. I'd get one anyway and just leave it in your pocket with the mic pointed up. Use it for some mundane use then just carry it.
yes they can track your cell phone in fact you can easly track your own mobile phone there is plenty of sites
quick qoogle http://www.followus.co.uk/index.html
But they can track you without a mobile phone on you via passive radar like celldar
http://www.newscientist.com/data/images/ns/cms/dn4299/dn4299-1_250.jpg
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn4299-cellphone-radar-tracks-traffic-flow.html
Cellphone 'radar' tracks traffic flow
* 09:45 27 October 2003 by James Randerson
Signals from cellphone masts can be used to track aircraft, monitor traffic congestion and spot speeding motorists without tipping them off that they are being watched.
The radar-like system, which is still being developed, has provoked media reports of the start of a huge extension of Big Brother-style surveillance - privacy campaigners have complained that it could be used to track individual people. But radar experts say such fears are unfounded.
Conventional radar works by transmitting a signal, listening for the reflection and using the time taken for the round trip to work out the object's distance. More sophisticated systems can work out the object's speed from characteristic changes to the signal's frequency, known as Doppler shifts. But such radar systems are expensive, and the signals they send out are easy to detect.
An alternative technique, called passive radar, gets round these problems. Instead of broadcasting its own signal, a passive radar system listens in to the cacophony of radio signals in the environment and monitors the way moving objects change them.
The US defence company Lockheed Martin is developing a system called Silent Sentry which exploits the signals from radio and television masts to spot aircraft and ships (New Scientist print edition, 4 December 1999).
Better accuracy
Now two British companies, Hampshire-based Roke Manor Research and the aerospace giant BAe Systems, have done the same thing with signals from cellphone masts. They say their system, known as Celldar, short for cellphone radar, can achieve better accuracy because cellphone masts are far more widespread than television and radio transmitters.
Celldar works out the position of objects in the area by comparing the signals reflected from them with those it receives directly from a base station, whose positions are known. From the Doppler shift in the signal it can also calculate the target object's speed.
Celldar has a number of advantages over conventional radar, says David Salter, a member of the team at Roke Manor Research. "The expensive part in most radar systems is the transmitter, because of the high power requirements." Because Celldar devices do not need their own transmitter, they can be made cheaper, smaller and more portable.
Roke Manor Research is currently testing a prototype system, and says it will be two to three years before a fully operational Celldar goes on sale.
Stealthy shadows
Because the system is passive, drivers will have no way of telling whether they are being monitored. It is this characteristic that makes passive systems so attractive to the military, says David Bebbington, a radar expert at the University of Essex in Colchester, UK.
Another advantage of passive systems is their ability to spot "stealthy" aircraft and ships, which are designed to fool conventional radar systems by absorbing signals or reflecting them away from the source. To passive radar, these objects show up as shadows that can be spotted.
Civil liberties groups are concerned that the system could be adapted or combined with other technologies to produce a device for tracking people. "I can see profoundly worrying aspects to the technology," says Simon Davies, director of Privacy International in London.
A document on Roke Manor Research's own website has fuelled speculation that the technology could be used in this way, stating that it "can detect vehicles and even human beings at militarily useful ranges".
But Bebbington points out that Celldar will be virtually useless for following individuals because its resolution is simply not good enough. And Roke Manor Research now says the information on its website will be removed
my guess is they have wired up a microwave hearing device to a passive RADAR system like celldar
http://docs.google.com/View?docid=dc64d9q2_0fc6mf8g8
Possible Influence on Subject(s)
Application of the microwave hearing technology could facilitate a private message
transmission it may be useful to provide a disruptive condition to a person not aware of
the technology. Not only might it be disruptive to the sense of hearing, it could be
psychologically devastating if one suddenly heard" voices within one's head."
Technological Status of Generator/Aiming Device
This technology requires no extrapolation of estimate its usefulness Microwave energy
can be applied at a distance,and the appropriate technology can be adapted from existing
radar units. Aiming devices likewise are available but for special circumstances which
require extreme specificity, there may be a need for additional development Extreme
directional specificity would be required to transmit a message to a single hostage
surrounded by his captors. Signals can be transmitted long distance(hundred of meters)
using current technology Longer distances and mores sophisticated signal types will
require more bulky equipment but it seems possible to transmit some type of signals at
closer ranges using man-potable equipment.
Range
The effective range could be hundreds of meters.
also it could come from some type satilite technology or both working together
Just out of curiosity,what's so interesting about your life that would make 'them' want to spy on you?
[And I don't mean that in a condescending way]
john hall mentions why they target indivuals around 12 mins in to the podcast
http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2010/04apr/RIR-100401.php
http://www.redicecreations.com/radio/2010/04apr/RIR-100401.jpg
John Hall - Satellite Terrorism, Surveillance Technology, Implantable Microchips & Biometric ID Cards
April 1, 2010
John Hall, author of “A New Breed; Satellite Terrorism in America” joins us to talk about electronic harassment, snooping and stalking technology, mind control and how CIA & NSA technology is being used to track, intimidate and even read the thoughts of people. John’s researcher partner Don Raumaker also joins us for the last five minutes of the first hour and then stays with us for the entire second hour. We discuss the implementation of biometric identification cards, satellite terrorism, the world wide implementation of the control grid. Topics Discussed: Project Galileo, Microchips, Biometric ID Card, Verichip, Sexual Assault, Freedom from covert surveillance, Agency Sterile, Multimodality System, GWEN towers, Cell phones, Mind Control, Frey, Microwave hearing effect, Manchurian Candidate, Murder of our foreign Minister Anna Lindh, Hearing Voices, Norway Spiral, de-population, John Holdren, How are People tracked? Biometric Signature, EEG, optical tracking, Haptic Devices, Smart Houses, Touch Sensitive Walls or an Office Building with Weight Sensors in the Floors, Loss of Privacy, Allergic to Radio Waves, Facebook, Mark Zuckerberg, Inqtel, CIA funding, Skype, X-Box Live and more. We continue to talk about Electronic Harassment in our next hour with John Hall and Don Raumaker. We talk about Skype, Acxiom, Eschelon and RFID (that’s Radio Frequency identification). We discuss DARPA’s information Awareness Office their activities and their choice of their Pyramid and All Seeing Eye logo, we talk about the European Union’s Project Indect, and their All seeing Eye logo as well. We go into some really interesting stuff about potential Alien Abduction Experiences that could be achieved with some of the technology that we’ve been talking about like hallucinations and voice to skull technology. We discuss Michael Persinger, his God Helmet, a way to manipulate the brain with Electromagentic fields to produce religious, drug related and alien type experiences. We also touch upon Mk-Ultra and talk about some of the victims of the technology, sexual harassment and more.
johngr
04-04-2010, 05:47 PM
There is one way to tell, take a small battery operated tape recorder and carry it with you covertly, such as in a pocket if it begins again hit record. Later you will have proof that it did or did not happen.
That wouldn't necessarily work. The Royal Navy and the US military have had technology, which they have recently licenced for advertising applications, since the late 50s at least, that allows them to put a voice in someone's head such that only he can hear it. Look up holosonics.
As much of the cultural mind-space as they occupy with their insipidy and social engineering, they want it all -- no thought no originated from them and I think they'll be using such technology more aggressively going forward.
johngr
04-04-2010, 06:00 PM
http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/2vmITs/campaignlive.co.uk/news/898754/BBC-Radio-3-pioneers-audio-spotlights-TV-campaign/
BBC Radio 3 pioneers 'audio spotlights' in TV campaign
by Ben Bold, Brand Republic, 16 April 2009, 08:45am
LONDON -The BBC is launching a television ad campaign promoting Radio 3 that features members of the public being targeted by beams of audio when they step into branded "sound spots" positioned at various locations in the UK.
The campaign, created by Red Bee Media, has been designed to get people aged 35-plus listening to a wider range of classical music and comes as Radio 3 celebrates the anniversaries of composers Purcell, Handel, Mendelssohn and Haydn.
Red Bee Media has produced four TV trails for the radio station.
Each shows how different people react when they step into the BBC-branded sound spots, including women shopping, families in the park and a businessman on his way home from the office.
The circles on the ground were printed with the words: "Please step in".
When member of the public stepped into the designated spots, they were suddenly able to hear classical music as if wearing headphones.
The sound spots used a technology that was originally developed by the Navy in the 1960s as a means of defence.
It enables sound to be specifically targeted at a specific spot -- the projected sound can only be heard when someone stands at an exact point.
Anton Ezer, Red Bee Media's creative director, said: "The music chosen for the sound spots is completely engrossing and highlights some of the most beautiful works by Handel, Haydn, Purcell and Mendelssohn featured on Radio 3 as the station celebrates the anniversaries of these composers.
"By framing the compositions in a contemporary lens through the use of the revolutionary audio spotlights, the trails aim to lead those who enjoy classical music to the wealth of wonderful music and performance broadcast on Radio 3."
The BBC Radio 3 campaign will appear this month on BBC One, BBC Two and BBC Four.
dreamweaver
04-04-2010, 06:17 PM
My primary concern is to find out if any one else has experienced strikingly similar happenings to me.
This guy (http://www.five.org.uk/) says he has had similar experiences to you. He goes by the internet name of Mike Corley (not his real name) and has been posting to newsgroups and other internet sources since the mid-1990s. He has also sent regular faxes to hundreds of MPs about it. He believes MI5 were harassing him by getting TV presenters to watch him through his TV and laugh at him. He says radio presenters such as Chris Tarrant did it to him too.
He also believes comments made to him in the street by passers-by were from MI5 agents.
The thing is that "Mike" is a diagnosed schizophrenic, he has said so himself, but he doesn't believe his MI5 persecution is connected with that. You'll need to read his site and decide for yourself.
thanks for the links
BBC Radio 3 - Step in - In Tune
BBC Radio 3 - Step in - In Tune - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=seLqqieLK1s
BBC Radio 3 - Step in - Breakfast
BBC Radio 3 - Step in - Breakfast - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4LFiTc6pjxw&feature=channel
ah so nice and relaxing.........not "do what we say" and aload of varable abuse
BBC Radio 3 - Step in - Afternoon on 3
BBC Radio 3 - Step in - Afternoon on 3 - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fgSsMX1cm5s&feature=channel
BBC Radio 3 - Step in - Performance on 3
BBC Radio 3 - Step in - Performance on 3 - YouTube
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Q8_vPhm_hI&feature=channel
as if the govement agency and miltray would not use this type of technology :rolleyes:
oh gee look at these special luckie people,why did the BBC choice them to be in thier add?
http://www.stumbleupon.com/su/2vmITs...s-TV-campaign/
The circles on the ground were printed with the words: "Please step in".
When member of the public stepped into the designated spots, they were suddenly able to hear classical music as if wearing headphones.
The sound spots used a technology that was originally developed by the Navy in the 1960s as a means of defence.
It enables sound to be specifically targeted at a specific spot -- the projected sound can only be heard when someone stands at an exact point.
intresting
why776776why
05-04-2010, 06:26 PM
They will use this method to chk at what stage of a sheep you are if your respond or are aware in anyway then you will be targeted fully at a later date.