PDA

View Full Version : carbo-loading wrong


nirvana
01-04-2010, 05:37 PM
Part 3: So what is wrong with carbo-loading?
There are two problems that those who recommend carbo-loading don't appear to realise:

Firstly, the body can't store carbohydrates in large quantities and most people already get more than enough carbohydrates to fuel their bodies' daily activities.
All carbohydrates, whether they are bread, pasta, sugar or jam when you put them in your mouth, enter the bloodstream as glucose. And the bloodstream can only hold so much.
The body, being a well-run power plant, puts the leftovers in storage to use in the future if it's needed. Some is stored as a type of starch called glycogen, but as it can't store much of this, the body turns most of the excess into fat and keeps it on deposit in the body's fat cells. And we see it walking around the streets wherever we go, hanging off bodies in a most unattractive way. Put simply, carbo-loading cannot work simply because excess carbs are not stored in a readily usable way.


The second problem lies in how the body uses its various options for fuel. Each of our body's cells contains lots of very small power plants called mitochondria . It is they that produce the energy we need from the food that we consume. Glucose is usually called the body's 'preferred fuel' because, if it is available, our bodies have been conditioned from birth to use it first. But it is not the best fuel. That distinction belongs to fats - or fatty acids, to give them their scientific name. Before the mitochondria can use either glucose or fatty acid as a fuel, it has to be transported into the mitochondria.
Fatty acids are transported into the mitochondria as completely intact molecules. Glucose, on the other hand, can be transported only after it has been broken down first into pyruvate by the process of glycolysis . This is then used anaerobically to produce energy with lactate as a by-product.

The by-products of the energy-production process when fatty acids are used are carbon dioxide and water, both of which are easily excreted. But when glucose is used, the lactic acid produced in the conversion process can build up in muscle cells and make them ache. It is this that is the cause of the aching muscles or pain involved in strenuous exercise - 'the wall' as athletes call it. This 'wall' severely limits an athlete's performance.

But it is not necessary ever to 'hit the wall'. If you do, your diet is wrong.

Now let's look at a real athlete
It was 1968 at the Mexico City Olympic Games. The spectators at the marathon went wild as a relatively unknown Ethiopian, Mamo Wolde, won the marathon. Not only was the thirty-six-year-old runner the oldest man ever to win this prestigious event, he did it in a time that has not been bettered to this day.

So what was Wolde's secret?
Wolde grew up in an Ethiopian village. His life consisted of running after and hunting wild game on foot. His diet was one high in animal meat and fat, with practically no carbohydrate. Subsequent tests showed that Wolde's body, under conditions of physical load, readily burned fat as its main energy source. Wolde had no concept of 'hitting the wall'. It had never happened to him.

And, just like him and Tim Hatcher, it never will happen to you

A real energy diet — a diet for winning
While there is little or no scientific evidence that carbohydrates are a particularly good energy food, there is a great deal that fats are.

What may not be immediately obvious is that, with the correct diet, constant exercise and practice to maintain muscle suppleness, strength and stamina doesn't seem to be needed either.

It is well known that carnivorous animals - lions and tigers - if fed their natural diet of fat meat, even when confined in cages or small pens in zoos for long periods of time, without the opportunity to exercise, do not lose their vigour, strength and endurance. Such animals in circuses are even more confined but they are still able to make prodigious leaps when called upon to do so.

Eskimo sled dogs are normally kept on leashes or in small kennels during the summer months and fed fat meat and fish. When, after some months of such inactivity, the winter arrives and they are required to pull sleds again, they have no need of a period of training or conditioning before they go about their arduous task. And they still manage to pull heavy sleds for up to twelve hours a day. The same applies to English hunting dogs. They do not lose their ability to run hard for long distances when correctly fed.

The same is true of Man. The Eskimo spends most of the year in practical inactivity during the winter months. Confined to his snow-covered hut or igloo, eating meat, fish and fat, he rarely ventures outside for months at a time. But when spring arrives, he immediately begins a very strenuous life, travelling many miles to hunting grounds. He, too needs no period of conditioning after his long winter of inactivity. He also requires less sleep and is much more resistant to fatigue.

In 1895 two Norwegians, Fridtjof Nansen and Frederik Johansen, landed on an island of the Franz Joseph group.(2) They had 'conventional' provisions to last for several weeks but, as there was abundant game in the form of walrus and polar bear, they decided to live off the land and save their provisions until the following summer. From the end of August 1895 until the spring break up of the arctic ice they got no exercise, did not wash themselves or change their clothes, yet they remained in perfect health and were able to do a full day's sledging on their first day of travel.

Rear Admiral Robert Peary also noted the ability of Arctic explorers to subsist for more than a year with no food other than pemmican twice a day. Men doing heavy work required two pounds of pemmican, which was the equivalent of six pounds of meat and a pound of fat per day. (3)

This ability to do fantastic feats of strength and endurance was not confined to the Arctic. Native porters in Australia, eating only kangaroo meat, carried heavy loads for up to twelve hours without rest or refreshment; and Aborigines in the desert, would lope for distances of up to twenty miles, with occasional bursts of speed to catch game, on a handful of worms, bugs and insects, and kangaroo meat. (4)

Conclusion
What all these people (and animals) have in common is their carbohydrate free diet. Fat is the best fuel for an athlete, carbohydrates are the worst. It really is as simple as that.

Still not convinced?
Athletes are told to eat a diet high in carbohydrates and low in fats. This, they are told, will increase their performance. However, this was not confirmed in a dietary study published in 1994. (5)

Using three diets: normal, high-fat and high-carbohydrate, the study showed that the high-carbohydrate diet increased performance by an average ten percent over a normal mixed diet. Not bad, you might think, but the high-fat diet increased performance by a massive thirty-three percent. That's much better. The authors conclude that restriction of dietary fat may be detrimental to endurance performance.

Experience from around the world confirms it

Caution
There is just one caveat. It takes time for the body to change from burning inefficient carbs to burning fats efficiently. You should notice a marked increase in performance in as little as 2 to 6 weeks on a low-carb, high-fat diet, but maximum performance may not be reached for several months.

References
2. Stefansson V. Cancer: Disease of Civilisation . Hill & Wang, New York, 1960

3. Military Surgeon , August 1944, Quoted in Walter L Voegtlin. The Stone Age Diet .

4. The Epic of Man . Time Inc. New York, 1961

5. Muoio D M, et al. Effect of dietary fat on metabolic adjustments to maximal VO-2 and endurance in runners. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise . 1994; 26 (1): 81-88


See also Feed your brain to win




Part 1: Conventional advice | Part 2: Now let's get it right | Part 3: So what's wrong with carbo-loading?



last updated 17 September 2007


Custom Search


Trick and Treat:
How 'healthy eating' is making us ill

"A great book that shatters so many of the nutritional fantasies and fads of the last twenty years. Read it and prolong your life."
Clarissa Dickson Wright
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Natural Health & Weight Loss


"NH&WL may be the best non-technical book on diet ever written"
Joel Kauffman, PhD, Professor Emeritus, University of the Sciences, Philadelphia, PA

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Perfect Weight Plan: Be Slim without Dieting


- a completely new kind of video and DVD.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Fluoride: Drinking Ourselves to Death?

"Must be regarded as essential reading . . . informative and thought-provoking." Dr Vyvyan Howard, MB. ChB. PhD. FRCPath. University of Liverpool.




Disclaimer
Disclaimer: Second Opinions is the website of Barry Groves PhD, offering online nutritional facts and online nutritional information. This website should be used to support rather than replace medical advice advocated by physicians.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

sitemap

arthurlydiard
03-04-2010, 04:12 PM
Now let's look at a real athlete
It was 1968 at the Mexico City Olympic Games. The spectators at the marathon went wild as a relatively unknown Ethiopian, Mamo Wolde, won the marathon. Not only was the thirty-six-year-old runner the oldest man ever to win this prestigious event, he did it in a time that has not been bettered to this day.


Did you write this yourself? I hope not. Mamo Wolde ran a time of 2:20:26 at the Mexico City games. The world marathon record has been lowered hundreds of times since then. Haile Gebrselassie of Ethiopia ran 2:03:59 in Berlin two years ago. Also, the Olympic marathon record is 2:06:xx held by Samuel Wanjiru of Kenya set in 2008 in Beijing. Furthermore, Paula Radcliffe is the women's world record holder with a time of 2:15:xx, 5 minutes quicker than Wolde. Wolde's performance was great for his time, but let's not get carried away. Even with an altitude adjustment for Mexico City, it can't be worth more than a 2:17 or so.

Also, how do you explain the diets of highly trained, highly successful Kenyan distance runners? In a study done in 2007 on the diets of Kenyan runners at a renowned Kenyan training camp showed the following results:

"The Kenyans ingested about 76.5% of their total daily calories from carbohydrate, such as ugali, vegetables, and other starches, which equated to 10.4 grams per kg of body weight per day or in total about 600 grams per day. ... About 13.4% of their total calories came from fat, with most of these fat calories from milk. Finally, about 10.1% of their total calories came from protein, such as beef and milk, which equated to 1.3 grams per kg of body weight per day or in total about 75 grams per day.

...

The Kenyan’s diet was very moderate in fat. The primary source of fat in their diet was from the full-fat milk that was added to their tea."

http://www.trismarter.com/blog/?p=20

nirvana
03-04-2010, 09:25 PM
Did you write this yourself? I hope not. Mamo Wolde ran a time of 2:20:26 at the Mexico City games. The world marathon record has been lowered hundreds of times since then. Haile Gebrselassie of Ethiopia ran 2:03:59 in Berlin two years ago. Also, the Olympic marathon record is 2:06:xx held by Samuel Wanjiru of Kenya set in 2008 in Beijing. Furthermore, Paula Radcliffe is the women's world record holder with a time of 2:15:xx, 5 minutes quicker than Wolde. Wolde's performance was great for his time, but let's not get carried away. Even with an altitude adjustment for Mexico City, it can't be worth more than a 2:17 or so.

Also, how do you explain the diets of highly trained, highly successful Kenyan distance runners? In a study done in 2007 on the diets of Kenyan runners at a renowned Kenyan training camp showed the following results:

"The Kenyans ingested about 76.5% of their total daily calories from carbohydrate, such as ugali, vegetables, and other starches, which equated to 10.4 grams per kg of body weight per day or in total about 600 grams per day. ... About 13.4% of their total calories came from fat, with most of these fat calories from milk. Finally, about 10.1% of their total calories came from protein, such as beef and milk, which equated to 1.3 grams per kg of body weight per day or in total about 75 grams per day.

...

The Kenyan’s diet was very moderate in fat. The primary source of fat in their diet was from the full-fat milk that was added to their tea."

http://www.trismarter.com/blog/?p=20


No I never wrote this myself. Its by barry groves Im reading his book trick or treat. Not to sure what to make of it yet .Thats why I posted the thread for oppinions.:)

josjo
11-04-2010, 09:54 PM
High fat, low carb is the way to go. There is a LOT of evidence to support this :)

milone
12-04-2010, 05:05 PM
Yes high fat high protein low carbs..there are only essential fatty acids (fats) and essential amino acids (protein) ever heard of an essential charbohydrate?? me neither.....how do you think the eskimos survive??? they dont grow much wheat or grains in the arctic do they??

josjo
13-04-2010, 09:56 PM
Bear in mind, of course, that making an example of an extreme group such as the inuit might be misleading - a contrary example would be to point at vegans, who seem to live on pasta, bread and biscuits ;)

Better to point out that nearly every single indigenous hunter-gatherer group survive on a low carbohydrate diet and, tellingly, covet the fatty organs, bones, brains and blood above the lean meat on any kill.

milone
14-04-2010, 01:48 PM
Bear in mind, of course, that making an example of an extreme group such as the inuit might be misleading - a contrary example would be to point at vegans, who seem to live on pasta, bread and biscuits ;)

Better to point out that nearly every single indigenous hunter-gatherer group survive on a low carbohydrate diet and, tellingly, covet the fatty organs, bones, brains and blood above the lean meat on any kill.

Good point!!

godgoo
14-04-2010, 02:10 PM
High fat, low carb is the way to go. There is a LOT of evidence to support this :)

It really depends what your doing. High fat for endurance, high carb for short bursts of energy.

The only important information to know about carbs, is the time of day to consume them ie, during the day, and early morning high GI carbs.

Evening time or time of reduced activity low GI carbs. Aslong as you dont go to bed off a white a rice, then you should be ok? Although if you have been carbed out all day, its still wont matter.

The time of day in relation to level of activity is the most important to consider.

Wiki Quote:

Glycogen is the molecule that functions as the secondary long-term energy storage in animal and fungi cells. It is made primarily by the liver and the muscles, but can also be made by glycogenesis within the brain and stomach.[2] Glycogen is the analogue of starch, a less branched glucose polymer in plants, and is commonly referred to as animal starch, having a similar structure to amylopectin. Glycogen is found in the form of granules in the cytosol in many cell types, and plays an important role in the glucose cycle. Glycogen forms an energy reserve that can be quickly mobilized to meet a sudden need for glucose, but one that is less compact than the energy reserves of triglycerides (lipids). In the liver hepatocytes, glycogen can compose up to 8% of the fresh weight (100–120 g in an adult) soon after a meal.[3] Only the glycogen stored in the liver can be made accessible to other organs. In the muscles, glycogen is found in a much lower concentration (1% to 2% of the muscle mass), but the total amount exceeds that in the liver. However the amount of glycogen stored in the body, especially within the red blood cells[4][5][6] liver & muscles, mostly depends on physical training, basal metabolic rate and eating habits such as intermittent fasting. Small amounts of glycogen are found in the kidneys, and even smaller amounts in certain glial cells in the brain and white blood cells. The uterus also stores glycogen during pregnancy to nourish the embryo

glycogen-to-water ratio of 1.0:2.7 (g:g)

I think that roughly if you burn a pound of glycogen, this results in a 3lb water loss also. Studies have shown varied results?