distraction

[lucifershammer]

YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

snagged this link from Ickes latest headlines.

a fascinating little demonstration in the art of distraction.

[helloperator]

Oh man! I never saw that dirty ape! What a sucker I am!

[christophera]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GxBroBF-uKI

snagged this link from Ickes latest headlines.

a fascinating little demonstration in the art of distraction.

Hey now. That was sneaky. I told my brain to watch the white shirts, guess what, I didn't see the ape.

Here is how I get away from the problem at the WTC. It is fairly common knowledege that when a building with a shear wall design has 1 wall severely damaged, that the building will fall towards that wall, or that wall will fail first.

http://algoxy.com/psych/images/wtc1tiltingfromsouth.jpg

The top of WTC 1 is tilting to the south as if the south wall is failing. WTC 1 had 61% of the shear wall destroyed on the north side meaning plans had nothing to do with the fall of the towers.

Apply the same thing to WTC 2 hit in the south east corner. Although the main body falls east, a small part of the very top fell west.

http://algoxy.com/psych/images/wtc2coreonto3.jpg

utterly impossible with a collapse.

Another point is that inside the narrow spaced light colored perimeter columns is a brown rectangular cube. That is less than 1/4 of one top and roof of the concrete core.

FEMA describes steel core columns in the core but they are never seen in the 9-11 images. I watched a documentary in 1990 titled "The Engineering adn Construction of the Twin Towers" and over 1 hour of the 2 hour show was about the difficulty of building the steel reinforced cast concrete core. Here is what FEMA tells us the core looked like.

http://algoxy.com/psych/psyimages/femacore.gif

[woolfie]

...and when the building's are collapsing (1 & 2) why do the rows of squibs become more prominent at the sections where the towers are split into 3?

...and why are they able to keep the BS up :confused: