Inquest in to Diana's death [Archive] - David Icke's Official Forums

View Full Version : Inquest in to Diana's death

montag

03-10-2007, 03:48 AM

Jury told Diana had feared for her life for years

Princess Diana had long-held fears about secret plots by the royal family to kill her in a car crash, the inquest into her death has heard.

The coroner heading the inquest, Lord Justice Scott Baker told the 11-member jury that Diana's fears for her life stretched back about two years before her fatal 1997 car crash in Paris.

The extent of her worries were revealed in two notes presented to the inquest, one written by her lawyer Lord Mishcon and the other by the princess to her butler Paul Burrell.

The coroner said Diana met Lord Mishcon at Kensington Palace in October 1995 - about a year before her divorce from Prince Charles was finalised - and told him "reliable sources" had tipped her off about a plot to "get rid of her".

She also stunned the lawyer, who died last year, by telling him the Queen was planning to abdicate in April 1996 so Prince Charles could become king.

In his note, Lord Mishcon wrote that Diana believed there was a plan to cause "some accident in her car, such as prepared brake failure"."

"She was convinced that there was a conspiracy that she and (Prince Charles' lover) Camilla (Parker Bowles) were to be put aside," his note said.

"I told HRH (her royal highness) that if she really believed her life had been threatened then security measures, including that to her car, would be increased.

"I frankly, however, couldn't believe that what I was hearing was credible."

The coroner said Diana's lawyer described his conversation with the princess with her then equerry and private secretary Patrick Jephson, who told him he "half believed" her claims.

Lord Justice Baker told the jury to bear in mind that Diana's claims were made at a time when "things must have been very traumatic and stressful for her".

"As events showed, her so-called 'reliable sources' certainly proved wrong about the abdication and the future of Camilla Parker-Bowles."

The jury was also shown an undated note Diana wrote to Mr Burrell accusing her former husband of plotting to kill her.

The note is believed to have been written in either 1995 or 1996 but did not come to light until excerpts were published in a British tabloid in 2003.

"My husband is planning an accident on my car, brake failure and serious head injury in order to make the path clear for him to marry (former royal nanny) Tiggy (Legge-Bourke)," she wrote.

"Camilla is nothing but a decoy so we are all being used by the man in every sense of the word."

The jury was told Diana once again relayed her fears about being "murdered by the royal family" to Mohamed Al Fayed while holidaying at his French villa in July 1997.

"On one occasion (she told him) she would probably go up in a helicopter and never come down alive," the coroner said.

AAP (http://www.theage.com.au/news/world/my-husband-is-planning-an-accident/2007/10/03/1191091155618.html)

eternal_spirit

03-10-2007, 11:49 AM

They must of known about the letter she wrote about the brakes of the car being tampered with. That's why they had to programme the driver to crash and make it look like AN ACCIDENT! This would rule out any tampering with the car.

edelweiss pirate

03-10-2007, 12:27 PM

tinmenace

03-10-2007, 12:28 PM

Take a look at these photos that are in evidence for this inquest. Look at the driver's face. Does this look normal to you?

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/dianainquest/faces2.jpg

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/dianainquest/faces1.jpg

Inquest Site (http://www.scottbaker-inquests.gov.uk/)

eternal_spirit

03-10-2007, 12:39 PM

She was a silly cow getting pregnant with that Egyptian Fayed fella.

Just like one of the hundreds of mooks who go to Sharm El Sheik and get knocked up by the smooth talking randy Arabs who don't get any from their own women until they marry them so they have to bang ours.

FFS did she seriously think she could have his baby! What planet was she on?
..............

The Fouetos was removed after she died. Possibly to be eaten in ritual and material to geneticaly create through genetic engineering
the sun God reborn. The father Dodi had to die before the sun God Osiris could be reborn as in Egyptian days.

horus21

03-10-2007, 01:23 PM

edelweiss pirate

03-10-2007, 01:32 PM

What? I'm guessing you're one of those sleezy Arabs who hit on English women (and men for that matter)..

Or a PC drone clone who fears anything too provocative.

It's called the truth wanktard wake up to it.

tinmenace

03-10-2007, 01:32 PM

What? I'm guessing you're one of those sleezy Arabs who hit on English women (and men for that matter)..

It's called the truth wanktard wake up to it.

Wow! What a profoundly racist thing to say!

tiswas

03-10-2007, 01:34 PM

what have you got against that arab pirate, didn't Diana have the hots for this look. but I thought the greif was too sentimental - none would mourn their folks like they did for her.

edelweiss pirate

03-10-2007, 01:39 PM

edelweiss pirate

03-10-2007, 01:41 PM

Wow! What a profoundly racist thing to say!

No. You're confused.

It's called putting an adjective with a noun.

It's English. Otherwise we can't communicate.

You think that there are no Sleezy Arabs? No Pisshead English? No Crazy Zionists?

Lesson over.

tinmenace

03-10-2007, 01:46 PM

Just pointing out the facts.

I lived with the Arabs for a year. Nice people.

Not very respectful attitides to women though.

You'd be surprised. They bang the Brit women then all the men in the village turn against the women, calling them sluts etc.

Still, I only lived there. You PC drones know it all don't ya?

Too bad Diana fell for it... She'd be alive now if she hadn't.

And you think that your initial comment about her was respectful? You're displaying the same attitude you criticize. :rolleyes:

You think that mentality towards women is restricted to Arab villages? No, in fact, women have been oppressed, worldwide, for a VERY long time.

The "slut" factor is everywhere. There is ALWAYS a question about how many lovers a woman has had. The more she's had...the worse for her. With men it's completely the other way around, it seems.

Diana was murdered by her in-laws. The evidence is compelling.

edelweiss pirate

03-10-2007, 01:51 PM

And you think that your initial comment about her was respectful? You're displaying the same attitude you criticize. :rolleyes:

You think that mentality towards women is restricted to Arab villages? No, in fact, women have been oppressed, worldwide, for a VERY long time.

The "slut" factor is everywhere. There is ALWAYS a question about how many lovers a woman has had. The more she's had...the worse for her. With men it's completely the other way around, it seems.

Diana was murdered by her in-laws. The evidence is compelling.

But she was the Princess, wife to the future King, the Throne of England... Think about it... How could they possibly allow her to have a son by another man...

Maybe she shouldn't have been such a slut. And maybe Dodi shouldn't have been so sleezy.

It's the same sad story that happens at holiday resorts the world over.

Sex as entertainment.

tinmenace

03-10-2007, 01:52 PM

No. You're confused.

It's called putting an adjective with a noun.

It's English. Otherwise we can't communicate.

You think that there are no Sleezy Arabs? No Pisshead English? No Crazy Zionists?

Lesson over.

Oh! You mean like "Fucking Christians"?

Or is that considered a verb?

tinmenace

03-10-2007, 01:53 PM

Maybe she shouldn't have been such a slut.

There you go doing it again. You are perpetuating the same mentality you accuse the "sleazy Arabs" of having.

Oh, the hypocrisy! :rolleyes:

edelweiss pirate

03-10-2007, 01:53 PM

Oh shut up, you are a fool.

tinmenace

03-10-2007, 01:56 PM

Oh shut up, you are a fool.

:eek: :rolleyes:

tiswas

03-10-2007, 02:18 PM

They wanted Diana dead for the simple face, and this fact alone. She was too much of a loose cannon for them alive, and what about the Barry Mannakee incident. I heard charles actually caught them at it.
As for dodi, I don't class him as a hero, he is actually hated in the Arab world.:p

pedsi

03-10-2007, 02:27 PM

hagbard_celine

03-10-2007, 05:08 PM

He looks like a man possesed:eek:

Yes, he's a good actor. That was a great piece of casting.

Also, secret studios have come on a long way since the moon landings!:cool: And that's cool CGI, superimposing the faces of Diana, Paul and Rhys-Jones over those models.

pedsi

03-10-2007, 05:15 PM

Is it possible she's not even dead...Hmmm?

peachped

03-10-2007, 05:30 PM

Is it possible she's not even dead...Hmmm?

I think it's most likely that she had to be bumped off to ensure the NWO designs on the Middle East went smoothly, which might not have been possible if Di had a child with Dodi.

synak

03-10-2007, 05:31 PM

Well whatever happened, two (or was it more?) paparazzi photographers from that night ended up dead after the 'incident'. I believe one of them was shot in the head but its been a while since I looked it up. Wonder what they saw that night....

eternal_spirit

03-10-2007, 05:36 PM

It is no coincidence that the CCTV cameras malfunctioned that night in the tunnel. Orders from above I'd say. Out of the other 364 days of that same year these cameras never malfunctioned once! This one fact alone proves they didn't wan't the world to see what happened that night.

synak

03-10-2007, 05:40 PM

neon

03-10-2007, 09:17 PM

Damn, look at the photos, someone knew what was about to happen. These look professional.

Another reason why she had to be killed, she was gaining alot of power over the people. Too much influence.

gold

03-10-2007, 09:46 PM

revelations

03-10-2007, 10:04 PM

How long before the crash were those photo's taken?

http://theskysatnight.blogspot.com/

tinmenace

03-10-2007, 10:27 PM

How long before the crash were those photo's taken?

http://theskysatnight.blogspot.com/

I didn't read the details. The photos just struck me strange, so I posted them, but I also posted a link with all the current evidence.

revelations

03-10-2007, 10:32 PM

ok thanks tinmenace

http://theskysatnight.blogspot.com/

tinmenace

03-10-2007, 10:39 PM

Yeah, those photos!...I just can't stop looking at them. WHO took those photos?

peachped

03-10-2007, 10:44 PM

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/dianainquest/faces2.jpg

http://www.globalfailure.com/images/dianainquest/faces1.jpg

Bodyguard: Steady now! Mind how you go...

Henri: No! Henri must drive! To oblivionnnnn!!!

tinmenace

03-10-2007, 10:47 PM

And the bodyguard has his visor down, like there was a bright light shining in his eyes. The reflection from Henri's glasses show that their IS bright light (or flash). Diana is looking out the back window as if she's watching something out there. If she were hiding her face from someone in the front - why not just put her head down?

It's all very strange.

narcolepticwatchman

03-10-2007, 11:04 PM

There's always cameras "malfunctioning" when something happens. *sigh* How can we forget the Pentagon mess where the cameras "malfunctioned" too and didn't catch the plane? They don't even have the decency to make up better excuses.

And all of the important cameras on 7/7. It was an Isreali company who were responsible for their maintenance I thinks. Can remember their name.

julieray

03-10-2007, 11:26 PM

That Coroner during the Inquest now must be about the third one. I remember reading that at least two of them resigned - obviously they were not happy to do all the lying necessary to get the Royals off the hook with this one and rather than go against their own morals, they would rather leave their career!!

Those photos are very strange, the driver does look like a man possessed - a raving lunatic I would say.

As for Diana being a slut, she should have been able to do exactly what she wanted regardless of who she was. She was a human being not an object to be owned. Just about everyone loved her and looked up to her, she behaved like a normal compassionate human being who did actually care about people instead of just pretending. If she was pregnant then so what?? It is those who are stuck rigid in their time warped so called politically correct vision of how things should be that caused this. Who would have really cared at the end of the day that the future King's mother had another child outside of marriage and whaahhh, to someone who wasn't of the same ethnicity??? I think most people have moved on from all this utter crap a long time ago. At least those who realise that we are all exactly the same.

It is all such a tragedy that should not have happened, and the Royals behind it all have to live with it for the rest of their lives. If they don't pay for it in this lifetime, they will in the next!!

synergy777

03-10-2007, 11:46 PM

i think it was visor security consultants, they were running a security drill playing out a bombing on the tube, like 911, norad was doing an exercise on hijacked airplanes. by using the cover of a security exercise, its keeps emergency services off guard, slow to react as they think its part of the drill. remember nethanyu getting a warning before 7/7, hours before.

i think 7/7 was false flag. they got the muslim youths to turn up thinking they were getting paid for a security exercise, then when they went on the trains, intelligence (rogue shadow govt element) had the explosives placed/triggered, hence double crossing the muslims, and using them as patsys. like they get people to help in police line ups etc.

well thats i would do, perfect planning. the patsys are oblivous and thinking they are making 500 quid plus for putting backpacks on and doing a security exercise/helping the govt, the forces/services delay their reaction knowing that its a scheduled exercise. the govt thinks its an exercise, only the shadow world govt aligned coup knows whats going on and pulls it off, without any oppostion, perfecto.

remember there are sections within sections in govt/military, coups etc. not all govt/military people are in the world government coup. look at the missing nukes fiasco in the states, thankfully there are people in the govt/military who are against the world government.

hagbard_celine

04-10-2007, 10:02 AM

Yeah, those photos!...I just can't stop looking at them. WHO took those photos?

They're very good quality considering they were taken by a pillion rider on a motorbike doing 70mph...

They're almost, dare I say it?... studio quality! ;)

tinmenace

04-10-2007, 10:45 AM

They're very good quality considering they were taken by a pillion rider on a motorbike doing 70mph...

They're almost, dare I say it?... studio quality! ;)

Right!

pedsi

04-10-2007, 11:03 AM

tinmenace

04-10-2007, 11:11 AM

synergy777

04-10-2007, 01:23 PM

look at the pics, the bag from the jewellers. fayed said dodi phoned him and told him di was pregnant, and thus he was proposing to her, the aide went to the jewellers and picked up the ring, they were going to announce the pregnancy/engagement on september 1st, the day after they were murdered. so the the intelligence agencies, who were monitoring them had to act quick. m16 who previously stated they were not in paris, later changed to we were in paris, but had bigger fish to fry and were "unaware" of diana presence in paris, total bollocks.

look its what power brings, have a problem, you correct it. she was a problem, dodi was a problem, the baby was a problem,so they deleted it. face the facts, they killed her, the evidence points to it. its just blind faith of the loyal subjects/sheep to a german royal family. fayed speaks out, because he isn't in awe or fear of them, he has balls.

http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/legal/article3024728.ece

MI6 men were in Paris when Diana died

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=485294&in_page_id=1770

Published for the first time: Coroner releases amazing pictures of Diana in the car that took her to her death
By RICHARD KAY - More by this author »

Last updated at 20:06pm on 3rd October 2007

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=485543&in_page_id=1770

Diana: The last smile before she died
By RICHARD KAY, MICHAEL SEAMARK and REBECCA ENGLISH - More by this author »

Last updated at 11:33am on 4th October 2007

Comments (4)

Smiling broadly, it was the moment Princess Diana seemed at her happiest.

Taken just hours before she died, previously unseen CCTV footage released yesterday shows an entirely different side to her during her fateful stay with Dodi Fayed in Paris.

mariag

04-10-2007, 01:36 PM

4 things that comes to my mind while looking at those pictures are these.
Why is the driver smiling and what is he looking at? His expression just isn´t right.
What was he doing during these missing 3 hours?
And finally , why showing these photos now? This whole thing is odd.

tinmenace

04-10-2007, 01:41 PM

synergy777

04-10-2007, 01:45 PM

Maybe its elite infighting, there are sectiosn at war, the proxy monarchies against the industrialists, both want the top slot.

i think its all controlled release of info, maybe they think they will put it to rest if they release photos, eg appear not to be hiding stuff. which is funny as the whole dossier disappeared a couple of weeks ago from the french legal offices, then the cock ups of the medics, m16, the photos showing the claims of mohammed being valid.

the elite have the motive and means. mohammed knows they did it, any objective, independant observer knows they did it, only the evil or stupid/scared believe the royal line.funny how in a free country, the people are scared to freely speak, scared of speaking out against the elite, well i never, lol none are so hopelessly enslaved as those who falsley believe they are free, we are not even citizens, but subjects.

bow down to the veniatian guelphs, the saxe coburg gothas, peasants.

lilly555

04-10-2007, 01:49 PM

I think that often they re-release old stories/photos ect. to ingrain it into the masses' subconcious minds on choosen dates as part of the spell.

cheesedanish

04-10-2007, 02:16 PM

Seems strange that they are only now coming out with these pics???

synergy777

04-10-2007, 02:25 PM

its not strange but planned. the only strange thing is that it over 10 years, modern democracies have such great judicial systems, lol

revelations

04-10-2007, 02:49 PM

howie

04-10-2007, 07:43 PM

http://www.channel4.com/news/

Channel 4 News showed new cctv footage tonight of Henri Paul leaving the rear entrance alone & waving to someone in a car & walking back inside. It could have been his handler giving the signal to activate his mind control program.

gold

05-10-2007, 04:21 AM

Can someone PLEASE PLEASE tell me why they are bothering to have this inquest at all? I mean surely the Royal Family are not going to be found guilty, and what about the Jury, do you really think that this paticular Jury is made up of random people?:rolleyes: Its a load of bollocks.

I totally agree with you ryan! The reptilian clan have their reasons, maybe it's too shut us lot up once and for all,. They must think we're stupid.

Jury members; Prince Philip, Queen Elizabeth II, Prince Charles and his tart, Tony Blair & Bush (in a gay way) and the late resurrected Queen Mother:D:D:D

synergy777

05-10-2007, 01:32 PM

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=7300

The Diana and Dodi Inquiry
From a Reader – October 4, 2007

What on earth does anyone think will come of this inquiry? Do they think that it will find that the Queen ordered the killings? Do they think that it will find MI6 guilty? It is all an establishment sham to pacify the public.

Little quirks will show up, questioning certain things, e.g. the fact that it took them two hours to get Dianna to the hospital, her only chance.

Yet it could show up many more little oddities, e.g. that she was embalmed in France, which is against French law, but useful in stopping blood tests to determine whether or not she was pregnant.

Or the Fiat Punto, which turned up, burned out complete with driver with bullet hole in the head. Or the fact the Henri Paul was on MI6’s payroll, as was apparently the driver of the Punto.

As always, the media will sensationalize every little twist and turn of this event, even eliciting public response to its progress. But whether it will publicise what really happened is another matter entirely

Fear not, it is as always a whitewash, though it will be portrayed as if it could turn up all kinds of information. Just don’t hold your breath.

Meanwhile, another reader writes: Hi, there seems to be a little confusion about this. So I like to point out, that just after Diana was killed the French coroner, who was first to examine her, stated that she was pregnant.

One of the last photos of Diana: Trevor Rees-Jones (left) raises his hand to shield his eyes from flashguns, at the wheel is Henri Paul (right). While in the centre Diana looks back to see if photographers are following

Comment – October 5, 2007

Never fear, this website will not be holding its breath over the inquiry into Diana and Dodi’s death. The definitive statement on the matter remains Richard Tomlinson’s affidavit, which for nearly ten years now has been all but ignored by the mainstream media.

That’s a damming indictment of our “free press”, particularly when contrasted with the amount of coverage given to reports of Saddam Hussein’s Weapons of Mass Destruction – all of which turned out to be completely groundless, but which conveniently prepared the way for the invasion of Iraq.

In essence the inquiry will be no more than a pantomime, like the inquiry into Dr David Kelly’s death it will be used to create the illusion of a serious investigation in an effort to pacify an increasingly cynical public.

Will it work? Well, maybe for some but not everyone will buy it and if nothing else it’s a measure of how our rulers – and their quislings in the mainstream media – hold us in such contempt: that they expect us to swallow it.

synergy777

05-10-2007, 01:36 PM

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?id=2

Affidavit of Richard Tomlinson

www.alfayed.com

(to Judge Herve Stephan)

I, Richard John Charles Tomlinson, former MI6 officer, of Geneva, Switzerland hereby declare:

1. I firmly believe that there exist documents held by the British Secret Intelligence Service (MI6) that would yield important new evidence into the cause and circumstances leading to the deaths of the Princess of Wales, Mr Dodi Al Fayed, and M. Henri Paul in Paris in August 1997.

2. I was employed by MI6 between September 1991 and April 1995. During that time, I saw various documents that I believe would provide new evidence and new leads into the investigation into these deaths. I also heard various rumours, which though I was not able to see supporting documents I am confident were based on solid fact.

3. In 1992, I was working in the Eastern European Controllerate of MI6 and I was peripherally involved in a large and complicated operation to smuggle advanced Soviet weaponry out of the then disintegrating and disorganised remnants of the Soviet Union. During 1992, I spent several days reading the substantial files on this operation. These files contain a wide miscellany of contact notes, telegrams, intelligence reports, photographs etc, from which it was possible to build up a detailed understanding of the operation. The operation involved a large cast of officers and agents of MI6. On more than one occasion, meetings between various figures in the operation took place at the Ritz Hotel, Place de Vendome, Paris. There were in the file several intelligence reports on these meetings, which had been written by one of the MI6 officers based in Paris at the time (identified in the file only by a coded designation). The source of the information was an informant in the Ritz Hotel, who again was identified in the files only by a code number. The MI6 officer paid the informant in cash for his information. I became curious to learn more about the identity of this particular informant, because his number cropped up several times and he seemed to have extremely good access to the goings on in the Ritz Hotel. I therefore ordered this informants personal file from MI6's central file registry. When I read this new file, I was not at all surprised to learn that the informant was a security officer of the Ritz Hotel. Intelligence services always target the security officers of important hotels because they have such good access to intelligence. I remember, however, being mildly surprised that the nationality of this informant was French, and this stuck in my memory, because it is rare that MI6 succeeds in recruiting a French informer. I cannot claim that I remember from this reading of the file that the name of this person was Henri Paul, but I have no doubt with the benefit of hindsight that this was he. Although I did not subsequently come across Henri Paul again during my time in MI6, I am confident that the relationship between he and MI6 would have continued until his death, because MI6 would never willingly relinquish control over such a well-placed informant. I am sure that the personal file of Henri Paul will therefore contain notes of meetings between him and his MI6 controlling officer right up until the point of his death. I firmly believe that these files will contain evidence of crucial importance to the circumstances and causes of the incident that killed M. Paul, together with the Princess of Wales and Dodi Al Fayed.

4. The most senior undeclared officer in the local MI6 station would normally control an informant of M. Paul's usefulness and seniority. Officers declared to the local counter-intelligence service (in this case the Directorate de Surveillance Territoire, or DST) would not be used to control such an informant, because it might lead to the identity of the informant becoming known to the local intelligence services. In Paris at the time of M Paul's death, there were two relatively experienced but undeclared MI6 officers. The first was Mr Nicholas John Andrew LANGMAN, born 1960. The second was Mr Richard David SPEARMAN, again born in 1960. I firmly believe that either one or both of these officers will be well acquainted with M Paul, and most probably also met M. Paul shortly before his death. I believe that either or both of these officers will have knowledge that will be of crucial importance in establishing the sequence of events leading up to the deaths of M. Paul, Dodi Al Fayed and the Princess of Wales. Mr Spearman in particular was an extremely well connected and influential officer, because he had been, prior to his appointment in Paris, the personal secretary to the Chief of MI6 Mr David SPEDDING. As such, he would have been privy to even the most confidential of MI6 operations. I believe that there may well be significance in the fact that Mr Spearman was posted to Paris in the month immediately before the deaths.

5. Later in 1992, as the civil war in the former Yugoslavia became increasingly topical, I started to work primarily on operations in Serbia. During this time, I became acquainted with Dr Nicholas Bernard Frank FISHWICK, born 1958, the MI6 officer who at the time was in charge of planning Balkan operations. During one meeting with Dr Fishwick, he casually showed to me a three-page document that on closer inspection turned out to be an outline plan to assassinate the Serbian leader President Slobodan Milosevic. The plan was fully typed, and attached to a yellow "minute board", signifying that this was a formal and accountable document. It will therefore still be in existence. Fishwick had annotated that the document be circulated to the following senior MI6 officers: Maurice KENDWRICK-PIERCEY, then head of Balkan operations, John RIDDE, then the security officer for Balkan operations, the SAS liaison officer to MI6 (designation MODA/SO, but I have forgotten his name), the head of the Eastern European Controllerate (then Richard FLETCHER) and finally Alan PETTY, the personal secretary to the then Chief of MI6, Colin McCOLL. This plan contained a political justification for the assassination of Milosevic, followed by three outline proposals on how to achieve this objective. I firmly believe that the third of these scenarios contained information that could be useful in establishing the causes of death of Henri Paul, the Princess of Wales, and Dodi Al Fayed. This third scenario suggested that Milosevic could be assassinated by causing his personal limousine to crash. Dr Fishwick proposed to arrange the crash in a tunnel, because the proximity of concrete close to the road would ensure that the crash would be sufficiently violent to cause death or serious injury, and would also reduce the possibility that there might be independent, casual witnesses. Dr Fishwick suggested that one way to cause the crash might be to disorientate the chauffeur using a strobe flash gun, a device which is occasionally deployed by special forces to, for example, disorientate helicopter pilots or terrorists, and about which MI6 officers are briefed about during their training. In short, this scenario bore remarkable similarities to the circumstances and witness accounts of the crash that killed the Princess of Wales, Dodi Al Fayed, and Henri Paul. I firmly believe that this document should be yielded by MI6 to the Judge investigating these deaths, and would provide further leads that he could follow.

6. During my service in MI6, I also learnt unofficially and second-hand something of the links between MI6 and the Royal Household. MI6 are frequently and routinely asked by the Royal Household (usually via the Foreign Office) to provide intelligence on potential threats to members of the Royal Family whilst on overseas trips. This service would frequently extend to asking friendly intelligence services (such as the CIA) to place members of the Royal Family under discrete surveillance, ostensibly for their own protection. This was particularly the case for the Princess of Wales, who often insisted on doing without overt personal protection, even on overseas trips. Although contact between MI6 and the Royal Household was officially only via the Foreign Office, I learnt while in MI6 that there was unofficial direct contact between certain senior and influential MI6 officers and senior members of the Royal Household. I did not see any official papers on this subject, but I am confident that the information is correct. I firmly believe that MI6 documents would yield substantial leads on the nature of their links with the Royal Household, and would yield vital information about MI6 surveillance on the Princess of Wales in the days leading to her death.

7. I also learnt while in MI6 that one of the "paparazzi" photographers who routinely followed the Princess of Wales was a member of "UKN", a small corps of part-time MI6 agents who provide miscellaneous services to MI6 such as surveillance and photography expertise. I do not know the identity of this photographer, or whether he was one of the photographers present at the time of the fatal incident. However, I am confident that examination of UKN records would yield the identity of this photographer, and would enable the inquest to eliminate or further investigate that potential line of enquiry.

8. On Friday August 28 1998, I gave much of this information to Judge Herve Stephan, the French investigative Judge in charge of the inquest into the accident. The lengths, which MI6, the CIA and the DST have taken to deter me giving this evidence and subsequently to stop me talking about it, suggests that they have something to hide.

9. On Friday 31 July 1998, shortly before my appointment with Judge Herve Stephan, the DST arrested me in my Paris hotel room. Although I have no record of violent conduct I was arrested with such ferocity and at gunpoint that I received a broken rib. I was taken to the headquarters of the DST, and interrogated for 38 hours. Despite my repeated requests, I was never given any justification for the arrest and was not shown the arrest warrant. Even though I was released without charge, the DST confiscated from me my laptop computer and Psion organiser. They illegally gave these to MI6 who took them back to the UK. They were not returned for six months, which is illegal and caused me great inconvenience and financial cost.

10. On Friday 7th August 1998 I boarded a Qantas flight at Auckland International airport, New Zealand, for a flight to Sydney, Australia where I was due to give a television interview to the Australian Channel Nine television company. I was in my seat, awaiting take off, when an official boarded the plane and told me to get off. At the airbridge, he told me that the airline had received a fax "from Canberra" saying that there was a problem with my travel papers. I immediately asked to see the fax, but I was told that "it was not possible". I believe that this is because it didn't exist. This action was a ploy to keep me in New Zealand so that the New Zealand police could take further action against me. I had been back in my Auckland hotel room for about half an hour when the New Zealand police and NZSIS, the New Zealand Secret Intelligence Service, raided me. After being detained and searched for about three hours, they eventually confiscated from me all my remaining computer equipment that the French DST had not succeeded in taking from me. Again, I didn't get some of these items back until six months later.

11. Moreover, shortly after I had given this evidence to Judge Stephan, I was invited to talk about this evidence in a live television interview on America's NBC television channel. I flew from Geneva to JFK airport on Sunday 30 August to give the interview in New York on the following Monday morning. Shortly after arrival at John F Kennedy airport, the captain of the Swiss Air flight told all passengers to return to their seats. Four US Immigration authority officers entered the plane, came straight to my seat, asked for my passport and identity, and then frogmarched me off the plane. I was taken to the immigration detention centre, photographed, fingerprinted, manacled by my ankle to a chair for seven hours, served with deportation papers (exhibit 1) and then returned on the next available plane to Geneva. I was not allowed to make any telephone calls to the representatives of NBC awaiting me in the airport. The US Immigration Officers - who were all openly sympathetic to my situation and apologised for treating me so badly - openly admitted that they were acting under instructions from the CIA.

12. In January of this year, I booked a chalet in the village of Samoens in the French Alps for a ten day snowboarding holiday with my parents. I picked up my parents from Geneva airport in a hire car on the evening of January 8, and set off for the French border. At the French customs post, our car was stopped and I was detained. Four officers from the DST held me for four hours. At the end of this interview, I was served with the deportation papers below (exhibit 2), and ordered to return to Switzerland. Note that in the papers, my supposed destination has been changed from "Chamonix" to "Samoens". This is because when first questioned by a junior DST officer, I told him that my destination was "Chamonix". When a senior officer arrived an hour or so later, he crossed out the word and changed it to "Samoens", without ever even asking or confirming this with me. I believe this is because MI6 had told them of my true destination, having learnt the information through surveillance on my parent's telephone in the UK. My banning from France is entirely illegal under European law. I have a British passport and am entitled to travel freely within the European Union. MI6 have "done a deal" with the DST to have me banned, and have not used any recognised legal mechanism to deny my rights to freedom of travel. I believe that the DST and MI6 have banned me from France because they wanted to prevent me from giving further evidence to Judge Stephan's inquest, which at the time, I was planning to do.

13. Whatever MI6s role in the events leading to the death of the Princess of Wales, Dodi Al Fayed and Henri Paul, I am absolutely certain that there is substantial evidence in their files that would provide crucial evidence in establishing the exact causes of this tragedy. I believe that they have gone to considerable lengths to obstruct the course of justice by interfering with my freedom of speech and travel, and this in my view confirms my belief that they have something to hide. I believe that the protection given to MI6 files under the Official Secrets Act should be set aside in the public interest in uncovering once and for all the truth behind these dramatic and historically momentous events.

The above testimony was made to the French inquiry into Princess Diana's death, headed by Judge Herve Stephan and subsequently ignored by both the inquiry itself and the media. Since testifying, Britain's security establishment has hounded Tomlinson to the point where he now lives in virtual exile in Cannes, France. However, he has not entirely disappeared and now keeps a weblog detailing his ongoing skirmishes with both French and British authorities.

candygirl

05-10-2007, 02:06 PM

Hi,
Don't you think there is a bigger picture here? Well the queen has signed all those treatys for the European union since 1972 and she is about to sign treaty 6 to totally hand power over to the EU aboloshing our parliment as we know it.
Isn't it convienient that the Royals are been shown in the media now to be behind Dianas death...... so the public will demand her abdication or she will just do it anyway....and this will make the way clear for the 6th treaty to be signed... she doesn't care she owns all that land ....her son won't care he owns loads as well... so they will remain rich and still have bodygaurds etc.
The whole inquest thing is yet more manipulation to lead us further into the big brother state to one currancy, one army, one leader etc.
My question is does anyone else agree with me? The inquest is to pave the way towards the 6th treaty?

synergy777

05-10-2007, 02:17 PM

she is from europe, germany what hitler failed to do the eu will do. if she genuinley cared about england, she would have tried to keep england sovereign, she hasn't. she has signed all treaties and will sign the 6th.

http://eutruth.org.uk/

they will still keep their lands, power so she is losing nothing with the nations losing its losing sovereignity. just makes me chuckle when i see all the plebs sing god save the queen, when she couldn't give a shit about god or country. if she did, why sign the treaties?

candygirl

05-10-2007, 03:03 PM

Yes when i see them all singing it it makes me laugh to!
Don't you think this long drawn out inquest is a bit of drama for them something they seem to thrive on perhaps the motto "why go out with a whimper when you can go out with a bang!" is the big Q's.
Why not leave under a cloud of negativity they love it!
All very dramatic don't you think?
BTW i am not belittling Diana's death in any way they are doing a nice job of that.
I think the inquest is a pantomime and we all know the truth as it is staring us in the face! Diana herself told us the truth.

tiswas

05-10-2007, 03:07 PM

I feel this inquest will close, just like the Burrell trial. The Royals seem to be above the law.

julieray

05-10-2007, 06:00 PM

I feel this inquest will close, just like the Burrell trial. The Royals seem to be above the law.

Unfortunately you are right the Royals are the Law. When you are arrested for a criminal act it is Regina that prosecutes (the Crown) and also the Crown owns all our land too, for instance, if you don't leave any family to inherit your estate, then it returns to the Crown.

How we ever got mixed up in all this, with a German Family who are not even British, is beyond me!! If you do a search on the Black Pope too, there is even mention that he and his cronies are above them too, so it does get worse!

jinjo5

05-10-2007, 09:20 PM

Its going to take 6 months for the case to be completed.......might as well end it now,we all know what the verdict is going to be...........'accidental death' or 'misadventure',it wont go beyond those two.

julieray

06-10-2007, 04:31 PM

Is anyone else as sceptical as me with the recent news being pushed down our throats today about the Press hounding Prince William and his girlfriend Kate on their night out??

As soon as I saw this on the news I immediately thought, how nice of the "Powers that be" to remind us that it was the "PRESS" who killed Princess Diana and here they are again, hounding her poor son and his girlfriend!!!:rolleyes:

It definitely seems to me that the Inquest isn't perhaps going quite the way they had planned or hoped, so just to remind everyone, how threatening the gutter press can be, they have cued William and Kate to be the stars of the evening, reinforcing everyone's thoughts that it was indeed the press who drove Princess Diana to her death and that it was just a tragic accident and not anything more sinister, because just look, here they are again doing the same thing to her poor son!!

If the inquest starts going down hill, I suspect we will have a few more of these performances set up to keep banging on at how Diana could never go anywhere, never have any piece or escape from the dreadful Paparazzi with their blood thirsty hunger to get a picture!!! It is all so predictable!

jinjo5

06-10-2007, 09:24 PM

i think this thread should be stopped now,we all know what final outcome will be.

steevo

06-10-2007, 10:21 PM

Channel 4 News showed new cctv footage tonight of Henri Paul leaving the rear entrance alone & waving to someone in a car & walking back inside. It could have been his handler giving the signal to activate his mind control program.

I think this CCTV footage is key to what happened. Henri Paul waves to 2 people (the mainstream media say they were paparazzi, where is the evidence to show that I didnt see them holding cameras, and why would Henri Paul wave to those people anyway, he must have been involved in the conspiracy and just happened to get murdered himself)

Is anyone else as sceptical as me with the recent news being pushed down our throats today about the Press hounding Prince William and his girlfriend Kate on their night out??

As soon as I saw this on the news I immediately thought, how nice of the "Powers that be" to remind us that it was the "PRESS" who killed Princess Diana and here they are again, hounding her poor son and his girlfriend!!!:rolleyes:

It definitely seems to me that the Inquest isn't perhaps going quite the way they had planned or hoped, so just to remind everyone, how threatening the gutter press can be, they have cued William and Kate to be the stars of the evening, reinforcing everyone's thoughts that it was indeed the press who drove Princess Diana to her death and that it was just a tragic accident and not anything more sinister, because just look, here they are again doing the same thing to her poor son!!

If the inquest starts going down hill, I suspect we will have a few more of these performances set up to keep banging on at how Diana could never go anywhere, never have any piece or escape from the dreadful Paparazzi with their blood thirsty hunger to get a picture!!! It is all so predictable!

I agree with that, I immediately thought the same thing, it's so obvious, but not to the sheeple...yet.

i think this thread should be stopped now,we all know what final outcome will be.

The reason that the inquest HAD to go ahead is because Al Fayed just would NOT go away. If they assassinated Al Fayed then the whole world would belive they killed Diana too. So far everything that I have seen in the inquest confirms she was murdered but the mainstream media news on tv has not shown the details that the newspapers show. They must have had a D-Notice
placed against giving out the full details on the story for obvious reasons.

The illuminati would love to stop this inquest because they know they cannot win...not REALLY WIN anyway. :cool:

jinjo5

06-10-2007, 10:27 PM

I think this CCTV footage is key to what happened. Henri Paul waves to 2 people (the mainstream media say they were paparazzi, where is the evidence to show that I didnt see them holding cameras, and why would Henri Paul wave to those people anyway, he must have been involved in the conspiracy and just happened to get murdered himself)

I agree with that, I immediately thought the same thing, it's so obvious, but not to the sheeple...yet.

The reason that the inquest HAD to go ahead is because Al Fayed just would NOT go away. If they assassinated Al Fayed then the whole world would belive they killed Diana too. So far everything that I have seen in the inquest confirms she was murdered but the mainstream media news on tv has not shown the details that the newspapers show. They must have had a D-Notice
placed against giving out the full details on the story for obvious reasons.

The illuminati would love to stop this inquest because they know they cannot win...not REALLY WIN anyway. :cool:
has though the so called illuminati could care anyway,arent they supposed to be all powerful?

steevo

06-10-2007, 10:33 PM

has though the so called illuminati could care anyway,arent they supposed to be all powerful?

Yeah they do care I think because once everyone is concious of what is really happening, then they (the illuminati) begin to lose control of us and our minds.

julieray

07-10-2007, 01:21 AM

Yeah they do care I think because once everyone is concious of what is really happening, then they (the illuminati) begin to lose control of us and our minds.

I agree, they can't possibly win, we are moving towards the unconditional love vibration/consciousness, they have two choices, come with us or be left behind.:)

eternal_spirit

07-10-2007, 10:36 PM

http://judicial-inc.biz/10_5_another...into_diane.htm (http://judicial-inc.biz/10_5_another_investigation_into_diane.htm)

howie

08-10-2007, 01:58 AM

Henri Paul goes outside again twice after he waves, this time he makes a hand gesture & appears to be talking to someone across the street.

Diana - Henri Pauls Hand Signals 2 - YouTube

This was not mentioned in any news reports or shown on television, the media version says the time he waved is the only time he had any contact with anyone outside after 12. The Daily Mail named the photographer he was waving to but the images are to grainy to recognise anyones face & there are no photos of this person to compare it with.

So I contacted the Baker Inquest website asking for the original cctv footage & Australian tourist video, they ignored my questions & asked who I was & where I lived, I asked them again for the original video because I could not see anything clearly from their low quality wmv streaming video & they said no.

http://img401.imageshack.us/img401/7291/000018gh1.jpg

barbitone

08-10-2007, 08:28 AM

has though the so called illuminati could care anyway,arent they supposed to be all powerful?

No. They aren't. They are a house of cards that we keep from falling over every day.

You, me people with heart and soul ARE all powerful because we are still connected with the one. :)

sunyatta60

08-10-2007, 08:59 AM

I remember Diana on that last holiday of hers with Dodi swim over to the press and say she would make an announcement that would shock the world.
At the time I saw this on one of the news channels here in the UK.
My personal thoughts are that she was going to reveal something that would be extremely damaging to the Royal family. People have been fed plenty of red herrings since like was she or was she not pregnant, that would have been damaging but had she gone on say panorama and said something along the lines of Icke is right the Royals are Lizards LOL we would have had melt down.
Or maybe they would have reeled out some eminent Psychiatrist who would have fabricated some psychosis on her part excerbated by her marriage break down.

CUE BONO

synergy777

08-10-2007, 11:04 AM

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=486340&in_page_id=1770

Diana jeweller: It WAS an engagement ring, but police changed my story

Last updated at 09:59am on 8th October 2007

Jeweller Alberto Repossi

A jeweller who claimed to have sold Dodi Fayed a ring for his engagement to Princess Diana has accused police of putting him under pressure to change his evidence.

Alberto Repossi, who is expected to be a key witness in the inquest into the couple's death, said that he had been intimidated by Scotland Yard detectives from the official inquiry into their fatal car crash.

At the centre of the extraordinary claim is a £130,000 star-shaped ring with five diamonds that Mr Fayed was allegedly planning to give the Princess on the night that they died.

Mr Repossi told the Italian newspaper La Stampa yesterday that he had given British detectives written proof that it was an engagement ring.

However, officers from the inquiry team led by Lord Stevens of Kirkwhelpington, the former Metropolitan Police Commissioner, then pressured him to alter his testimony to state that it was not for an engagement, he claimed.

The engagement ring 'Dodi bought Diana'
The jeweller's evidence is likely to form a key part of the inquest.

Lord Justice Scott Baker, the coroner, has said that the issue of the couple's alleged engagement was one of 20 key areas to be examined.

Mr Fayed's father, Mohamed Al Fayed, has claimed that the couple were killed on the orders of the British Establishment after learning that they were to announce their marriage and that the Princess was pregnant.

Mr Repossi claimed that the late Princess personally chose the ring from the Dis Moi Oui (Tell Me Yes) collection during a visit to his Monte Carlo shop in early August 1997.

Mr Fayed then collected the ring from his Paris shop, close to the Ritz hotel, just hours before the couple died on August 31.

“I had given Scotland Yard the actual copy of the receipt given to Dodi's secretary on which was clearly written 'engagement ring',” Mr Repossi told La Stampa.

“I am probably the only witness to the fact that Dodi and Princess Diana were going to get engaged.”

The jeweller claimed that one of four tapes used to record the third interview was blank, as if it had been erased.

He said that at the final interview the detectives asked him to change his statements so that it would not appear that the Princess and Mr Fayed were about to announce their plans to marry.

“They said, 'It would be better for your reputation if you changed your version of events'.”

Although Mr Repossi's comments will be seen in some quarters as evidence of an attempt to cover up the death of the Princess, they appear to contradict his previous statements about the ring.

In September 1997 he said that he did not know if Mr Fayed intended it as an engagement ring. The following April Mr Repossi said that he was convinced that it was not.

Other witnesses also have different accounts of the couple's visit to Monaco on August 5, 1997, when they are said to have visited Mr Repossi's shop.

John Johnson, a bodyguard, told Lord Stevens's inquiry that they did not visit a jeweller, while René Delorm, Mr Fayed's butler, insisted that they had visited a shop, which he assumed to be Repossi's, for about 15 minutes.

Lord Stevens's inquiry viewed CCTV footage of Mr Repossi's Paris shop on August 30 and found that Mr Fayed was in the shop for about seven and a half minutes.

“When he left it appeared on initial viewing that he picked something up,” the inquiry reported. “After closer viewing, it was clear that the item he picked up was in fact his own sunglasses. He did not take any jewellery with him.”

It concluded: “The evidence is that the 'Tell Me Yes' ring was not selected as an engagement ring by the Princess of Wales and Dodi Fayed together.”

But a senior source close to the inquiry told The Times: “There is a video of what actually happened in the shop, which has been handed over to the authorities.

"That will clear up some of these allegations. The claim that there is a copy of a receipt in which it states clearly that it is an engagement ring is under dispute.

“Mr Repossi has changed his story several times. Any allegation that he was put under any pressure by Scotland Yard officers to change his story is firmly denied.”

Michael Cole, spokesman for Mr Al Fayed, said: “Mr Repossi will in due course need to come to the inquest to give a full account of everything he knows on oath before the jury.”

synergy777

08-10-2007, 04:30 PM

DRIVER 'MET MI6 SPY' ON CRASH NIGHT

October 7,2007
By James Murray and Gordon Thomas Have your say(12)
http://www.express.co.uk/posts/view/21290/...on-crash-night-

Renegade spy Richard Tomlinson will tell the Princess Diana inquest that he believes Ritz hotel security chief Henri Paul met an MI6 handler on the night she died.

Today we also reveal a French spy chief allegedly seen chatting to Paul on the night of the crash is refusing to give evidence at the inquest.

Mr Tomlinson, a former MI6 officer once jailed for leaking Government secrets, will make sensational claims via a videolink from his bolthole in France to the inquest in London.

He is refusing to return to Britain to give evidence in person because he fears he will be arrested and jailed. Cambridge-educated Mr Tomlinson, 40, will give evidence supporting the claim by Harrods tycoon Mohamed Al Fayed that there was an Establishment plot to kill Diana to stop her marrying his son, Dodi, a Muslim.

Private testimony that Mr Tomlinson gave earlier caused ructions within MI6, leading to him being closely monitored by the British security services. Mr Tomlinson told the French examining magistrate Herve Stephan that a Frenchman working in the security department at the Paris Ritz was on MI6’s books.

He added: “I cannot claim that I remember from reading this file that the name of the person was Henri Paul but I have no doubt with the benefit of hindsight that it was he.”

In 2001 he claimed: “Henri Paul, who was the driver at the time of the accident, was an MI6 informer and, rather interestingly, he was missing for about half an hour before the accident.

“No one knows where he was and then when he was killed he was found with a very high alcohol level in his blood and a very substantial amount of money in his pocket.

“Now putting those three pieces of circumstantial evidence together, I suspect that shortly prior to his death he was in a meeting with his MI6 handler.

“I think that MI6 should hand over his personal file as a witness statement because clearly in an inquest into his death, knowing where he was for that missing half hour, who he was with and how much alcohol he had drunk are very important factors.

“What I am saying is that there is important information in MI6 files and I think that they should be handed over to the judge in charge of the inquest.”

Speaking exclusively to the Sunday Express from his home in France, Mr Tomlinson said he will reveal discussions he had within MI6 in May 1992 with a colleague about an assassination plot.

The Sunday Express has been given the identity of the MI6 man he spoke to but we are not publishing his name on the grounds that his security may be compromised.

Mr Tomlinson said: “I was having a serious discussion with a colleague on developing and targeting operations in the Balkans. These were known as P/40s. He handed me a Y-file, identified as most restricted by the yellow stripe on the front. Inside was a document, two typed pages long, with a small yellow card attached to signify it was an accountable account rather than a draft proposal.

“Accountable meant it was in a ready to act state. It was entitled ‘The Need to Assassinate President Milosevic of Serbia’. I distributed it to senior MI6 officers.

“There were detailed discussions and the consensus was that a stun device could be used to dazzle the driver’s gaze of Milosevic’s car as it passed through the Geneva tunnel, forcing him to crash.”

Milosevic was to attend an international conference on the former Yugoslavia.

Mr Tomlinson added: “What later struck me about the deaths of Diana and Dodi was that the claims how they had died mimicked what was in the document on how to assassinate Milosevic.

“I will testify that the Y-file document shows Henri Paul could have been blinded as he drove through the Paris underpass by a high-powered flashlight.

“The Y-file proves this was a technique which, at the time of Diana and Dodi’s deaths, was consistent with MI6 methods.”

The inquest into the death of Diana and Dodi has seen CCTV footage of the couple in and around the Ritz Hotel in Paris on the night of August 30, 1997.

But the inquest has been told there were gaps in the movements of Henri Paul, the hotel’s acting head of security. He left the hotel between 7pm and 10pm, thinking his duties were over, but returned when Diana and Mr Fayed unexpectedly returned to the hotel for a meal.

Where Mr Paul went during those crucial three hours has never been fully explained. There is also a period when he went missing for eight and a half minutes from 10.22pm when he was not picked up on any CCTV cameras.

The investigation into the crash carried out by former Metropolitan Police chief Lord Stevens decided that Mr Tomlinson was unreliable and that he had embellished his accounts.

Scotland Yard detectives working for Lord Stevens carried out detailed investigations at MI6. They discovered that an MI6 officer, codenamed Fish, did write a proposal in 1993 to assassinate an extremist Balkans leader, but it was not Milosevic, and senior officers in the service said the man was acting alone and the plan would not have been sanctioned.

Mr Tomlinson said: “The two Stevens’ detectives said in their own inquiries at MI6 that it became very clear that what I had told them, and which they had confirmed in the MI6 files, would have an important influence on how the Stevens inquiry finally reported.

“There is no doubt at all there was a major intelligence presence in events leading up to the death of Princess Diana and Dodi.”

New Zealand born Mr Tomlinson joined MI6 as agent D/813317 in 1991. He worked as a “targeting officer”, serving in the Balkans and Moscow. Later he served in the East European Controllerate, one of the most important departments in the Secret Intelligence Service. It gave him access to the highly restricted Y-files.

He was sacked in 1995 and was jailed for a year in December 1997 for breaching the Official Secrets Act, a sentence which has left him with bitter memories.

He says he does not know why he was sacked, but admits he was depressed when he finished working in Bosnia because of the dreadful sights he witnessed. Last March the Crown Prosecution Service announced that it would not be prosecuting Mr Tomlinson for offences under the Official Secrets Act.

The then Attorney General Lord Goldsmith decided it would not be in the public interest to continue legal action against him.

It was alleged that Mr Tomlinson had committed blackmail offences by threatening to make more disclosures because Scotland Yard would not return computers seized from him.

julieray

08-10-2007, 08:45 PM

On Sky News this morning as I was getting up, had William Roache on it (Alias Ken Barlow) from Coronation Street. They must be getting desparate now, they had him on it saying "seriously does anyone think Prince Philip has anything to do with the death of Princess Diana??? It is absolutely ludicrous!! We should all just lay her to rest!!!" Yes, I bet they would like that!!! What an absolute mind controlled idiot:rolleyes:

gold

08-10-2007, 09:10 PM

ngawaka19

09-10-2007, 06:08 PM

But she was the Princess, wife to the future King, the Throne of England... Think about it... How could they possibly allow her to have a son by another man...

Maybe she shouldn't have been such a slut. And maybe Dodi shouldn't have been so sleezy.

It's the same sad story that happens at holiday resorts the world over.

Sex as entertainment.

Yeah.........seems like someone didn't get any last night, why he's so grumpy. Er' in doors wouldn't let you get one over last night love. ohhhh didims.......
get a grip dude, is there anything beautiful in your life? Certainly no sensuality. No wonder she's not interested.

steevo

09-10-2007, 06:51 PM

It took 10 years for the inquest, this was by design. The Illuminati know that the vast majority of the population dont give a shit cos they have now got over Diana's death. If the inquest had took place at the time of the "accident" then imagine the effect it would have had :eek:

On this thread i said that I think the Illuminati can't win this one, but they are definitely giving it a go. The mainstream tv news (on every channel) only reports on stuff that we already knew (mostly) and does not go into any detail on the new stuff.

The Illuminati know that the case will end with a verdict of accident/misadventure (or something similar), and it will be because of a lack of REAL evidence because it was destroyed or whatever by the MI6.

The sheeple will say the inquest was all a waste of time (and money etc) and the reason the people will say this is because the mainstream media will not report the truth on their channels which are controlled by the Illuminiati.

That phrase "Info-Wars" is very appropriate.

Detailed reports of the Inquest are found in most tabloids (as far as I know) but tabloids dont create the hysteria (which is warranted) that tv can.

I have been saving the reports from Online mainstream newspapers which go into detail and I have been saving the videos too.

So the Illuminati WILL, in all probability, get away with this murder BUT the inquest HAS been worth it cos it's now even more bloody obvious.

adzboarder

09-10-2007, 07:59 PM

Bit of a late-comer to this thread, but I brought a massive tin of whitewash which will come in very handy 6 months down the line...

helloperator

09-10-2007, 09:01 PM

What...are you gonna paint 'help' on your roof?

julieray

09-10-2007, 09:08 PM

I'm not much into corrie! Was he Knighted 'Sir' by anyway??

I have just done a Google search on him and he received an MBE!! Well that just about says it all really!!!!:rolleyes:

cheesedanish

11-10-2007, 01:47 PM

This morning they mentioned on the radio that they showed the crash
photos to the jury and that they were poor quality. I wonder how
come these pics would be bad quality? Any ideas?

hilary upstart

11-10-2007, 02:55 PM

Here's something; their hotel room was 101. Does anybody think this an illuminati joke. ie Putting them in room 101 before getting rid of them, a not so coded way of saying big brother is responsible ?

synergy777

11-10-2007, 02:58 PM

you know what, look how everyone loved her, lol look how they care now. thats real love that is.

tintin

11-10-2007, 09:29 PM

Folks, there are all kind of links from DIANA
to MADELEINE McCANN.

See my last posts in that big Madeleine thread.
Some stunning links to the DA VINCI CODE, the POPE
and PARIS.

It's all connected.
And rember that EYE of Madeleine?
that 7 O'Clock eye, is referring to
Templars day, coming saturday.
The 700 year anniversary...

The McCann family comes from Rothley,
was a Knights Templar towen, and still is
more or less.....

pedsi

13-10-2007, 01:05 PM

If what David Icke says about Alfayed is true, that he himself is well connected to the royals through the sultan of brunai then hes obviously involved in this whole charade.Could he be diverting us from the real truth here the truth that his son and dianna never died at all.Everything we know about Dianna,her compassion for others,her honesty,all her good work for charity,these ideals were spoon fed to us through the media and were deliberatly done so in order to give us the impression that she was so different from the rest.She was portrayed as the perfect princess and the masses bought it,myself included at the time.
I am am awre of all the ritualistic sacrafice connotations surrounding her death but even if she never died all the greiving energy was still extracted from the masses and channeld for their own manevoelant use.Now I'm not trying to come out with some theory that I can come up with possibities of how it was done all I'm saying is we've gone ten yrs now debating how she died and who was behind it,we've had enquiry after enquiry,and its been kept in the public mind through the media,all the time saying diannas dead.
Perhaps the real truth lies 180 degrees from where we are being told to look.
Just a thought!!

Here's a pm I received regarding the above post...I must say I was a bit surprised!
Hi, I've just logged into this forum for the sole purpose of answering you Pedsi when you ask is it possible Diana is not even dead. I don't 'do' forums anymore, been there dunnit so to speak and not interested in getting into verbal fights etc but was stunned by your comment when I casually and quite out of the blue looked at Ickes forum. Why? 'cos I had 3 dreams in a row...identical dreams...the same night...where I woke up in between. They all said Diana was not dead and the switch was made with a lookalike body round the backstreets of Paris where she was 'lost' for a few hours. She is being kept a prisoner, she has lost tons of weight, looks years older, and is trying to escape and Charlie is in it up to his neck. Di is being used, her fear is being kept up and one day she will be released and the world will make a collective gasp all over again and the pure energy sent up by millions will be utilised - when the need arises. One of her boys is very sad and wants to kill himself as he misses his mum too much. The queen 'suddenly' remembered what the butler saw that day at the famous trial where they were going to screw him into the ground because he in fact sussed out it was'nt Di in the her final box and is threataning to blab all....thats whats on the video tape they broke in and tried to find and everybody is shit scared he'll die 'cos if he does he's left copies with reliable people who will publish the tape if he dies 'suddenly'. He is being protected from assassins or injury in case them in the know think he's been bumped off and they'll publish the tape as instructed. What else would scare the pure shit out of the saxegothas on our English throne? btw both Diana & camilla were/are used as smokescreens for Charlies sexual preferences. Make of this comment what you will Pedsi...I've passed it on and its out of my hands now.I'm not drunk, on drugs or into any fantasy comics,crap or dodgy website.
Regards.+++++++
Can you immagine anyone coming out of this car alive?
http://spmedia.canada.com/gallery/00posted/PROBE-DIANA-3.jpg

What about this one?
http://spmedia.canada.com/gallery/00posted/PROBE-DIANA1.jpg

alrick888

13-10-2007, 01:26 PM

That's interesting, but what about these pictures?

I'm not an expert on Diana's death, all I know is the initiual story was that the car with Dodi and Di crashed into a pillar with papparazzi in hot pursuit.

Now on all these photos the car is not against the pillar, but against the other side of the tunnel, although the oils stains are there on the pillar. So the car bumped off, or what?

Then, secondly, are there no pictures with the people still in the car?

Judging from these pictures, I find it hard to believe she died from this accident. Especially since she was sitting in the backseat. And didn't the bodyguard who was in front survive?

So yeah, those dreams sound like they could be close to the truth.

peachped

13-10-2007, 01:27 PM

Whoever sent you that message probably thinks Madeliene is still alive too :rolleyes:

Still who knows...

pedsi

13-10-2007, 01:42 PM

Judging from these pictures, I find it hard to believe she died from this accident. Especially since she was sitting in the backseat. And didn't the bodyguard who was in front survive?

My thoughts exactly..I dont see how two people in the back of that car would die almost instantly... on the other hand,if they are dead then perhaps they were killed at the scene!!

julieray

13-10-2007, 01:52 PM

What strikes me as interesting is the fact that on the video footage recently, shown on TV a doctor was administering oxygen to Diana who had apparently fell into the footwell! Looking at those pictures, why the need to remove the roof?? The door to Diana was already open when the doctor was treating her!!! So this does not make sense.

Furthermore I think I do remember the original car pressed up against the pillar, perhaps we should try and check out some news archives with regards to this, but I think on the TV footage recently shown, the car was in the middle of the tunnel with the road way either side of it. Then if that is indeed the case, why then move the car to where those photos have been taken??

Indeed there is much more here than meets the eye!!! If that PM is true and in fact it does seem as though there could be elements of truth within it, I hope she does come out of this alive - that would surely be the downfall of the Royals at least, and if that is the case, surely this would have a direct knock on effect with other societies and intelligence agencies as quite clearly each has played their part in this.

julieray

13-10-2007, 02:00 PM

Sorry I forgot something else too, inwhich my husband said recently after watching the news wherein they claimed they could not identify who the off duty fireman was.

Are we led to believe that, an off duty fireman who was instantly on hand who helped who nobody knew and who has since never come forward to identify himself is still out there somewhere, obviously oblivious to what is happening right now???? Come on.....even the sheeple are not that gullible surely!!

And if he was off duty how did anyone even know he was an off duty fireman in the first place??? This inquest is turning into a comedy performance if the jury are swallowing this pile of rubbish! I would love to know who they are and how much they have been paid to deliver the verdict at the end of death by dangerous driving!!!

pedsi

13-10-2007, 02:17 PM

Perhaps its all a massive distraction from the real truth....when you look back on it now from the perspective that she may not be dead a lot of the annomilies from the official version of events take on a whole new life,eg,why was the body embalmed?and why the long delay in the tunnel?Allso Icke reckons the only man who had the authority to alter security arrangements for his son was Al Fayed himself.

It would be intersting to see if anyone knows of any mythology or history relating to the return of the moon godess

tinmenace

13-10-2007, 02:24 PM

All very interesting. Is it outside the realms of possibility that she's still alive? Not at all.

It makes sense because this ongoing circus with trying to uncover the "truth" about HOW SHE DIED could be a diversion to keep people from knowing that she is still alive.

Very very interesting!

Super Sleuths, Y'all, including the mystery dreamer person ;)

alrick888

13-10-2007, 03:18 PM

This is apparently the link for the Diana dying pictures (not very pleasant):

http://www.misterclip.com/dianadying.htm

It is remarkable that while the other pictures are so sharp and clear (and in color), these are mostly black and white and of very low quality.

The first shows Diana with a painful look on her face. She hasn't got a visible headwound and doesn't look like she's dying.

cheesedanish

13-10-2007, 03:29 PM

Thanks Alrick ... picture 3 does not look like her?
Do you think they are just trying to make money out of these pics!
From what I read in the Biggest Secret - a lot went down in that
tunnel that night. I really wish we knew the truth!

alrick888

13-10-2007, 03:44 PM

It seems all pictures of the inside of the car have been confiscated as "evidence" - I thought it was an accident??

So they have never been published for profit, until recently when this Channel 4 documentary was broadcasted in the UK. These few, very unclear pictures have been released along with pictures of the car, that has been turned in the opposite driving direction "by the impact of the crash" according to the BBC reporter.

julieray

13-10-2007, 04:45 PM

To me those colour photos just look like someone has been flytipping!! They look like bin bags full of overflowing rubbish!!! It is strange that when they are trying to make a point - out come the crisp clear pictures, yet, as you say, all the others are blurred, black and white or they could be just about anything!!!

tinmenace

13-10-2007, 04:48 PM

What do you make of this?

'Dead' Harry statue goes on display (http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=11666)

howie

14-10-2007, 03:21 PM

Mail on Sunday

http://img157.imageshack.us/img157/8593/mailonsundayhenripaullcvk5.jpg

The Bar Vendôme – plush, chintzy and expensive – did not have a camera on the fateful night ten years ago, and only a record of the bar bills shows that Henri Paul, suddenly recalled to work at 10pm when he thought he had the rest of the night off, bought two glasses of Ricard

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article2625140.ece

http://img296.imageshack.us/img296/4493/mailonsundayhenripauldenu1.jpg

Around them fusses Henri Paul, head of security at the Ritz, and Trevor Rees-Jones (now called Trevor Rees), their bodyguard. All move like puppets; the CCTV cameras take only one picture per second

http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article2591911.ece

synergy777

14-10-2007, 05:59 PM

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=487525&in_page_id=1770

Henri Paul's father raises dramatic new questions over Diana's death crash

From DENNIS RICE and TIM FINAN in Lorient, Brittany - More by this author »

Last updated at 13:27pm on 14th October 2007

The father of Henri Paul, the driver who was killed alongside Princess Diana and Dodi Fayed has raised disturbing new questions about his son's death.

In an exclusive interview with The Mail on Sunday, Jean Paul claimed his son ejected a mystery intruder from the Ritz Hotel in Paris shortly before he drove off in the Mercedes carrying the couple.

And he said there were baffling irregularities in his son's finances and speculated about why the police had failed to return some of Henri's personal effects to the family

As the inquest into Diana and Dodi's death enters its third week, Mr Paul, 76, said: 'We've had it up to here with this affair. The whole world has made an arch scapegoat of our son.

'In my heart, though, there is a flame of hope that one day the truth will out. But I think if the truth does come out, it could spell the ruination of Great Britain.

'They have looked constantly for a scapegoat. It was easy enough to blame the small-time French driver – my son.'

Henri Paul escorted a man from the Ritz shortly before driving the Princess of Wales and her boyfriend Dodi Fayed to their deaths, his father claimed.

He said his son was interrogating the intruder away from the prying eyes of the paparazzi.

This does not explain, however, why there is no footage of the incident on any of the Ritz's 31 security cameras.

But it may shed light on why the inquest was told last week that not all of Paul's movements on the night of the crash can be accounted for.

Paul, 41, who was also the Ritz Hotel's deputy head of security, was recorded on CCTV leaving the front entrance at 10.34pm before returning again at 10.46pm. For eight-and-a-half of those minutes he vanishes from security cameras.

Mr Paul said his son was alerted to the man's presence by a member of the hotel staff.

His claim raises questions such as: was the intruder a member of the security services whom Dodi's father Mohamed Al Fayed maintains caused the crash, then covered up the murders?

Or was the mystery man someone Paul had planned to meet that night and who he had to pretend to throw out after being spotted by another member of staff?

Or could it have been one of the paparazzi he was seen signalling to later?

The inquest has been shown CCTV footage of Paul waving at members of the paparazzi, raising the possibility that he was being paid to tip them off about Diana's movements.

Jean Paul is adamant that his source at the Ritz is telling the truth.

Speaking from his home in Lorient, Brittany, he said: 'Shortly before the Mercedes left the Ritz, Henri had someone ejected from the Ritz because they were not behaving properly.

'This man was not a customer, he was a curieux [nosy parker] and it was Henri's job to have him ejected. Henri had this taken care of quietly. This was told to me by someone at the Ritz and there were two witnesses.

'A report had been made to the reception desk about this man and Henri had been called in to deal with the matter.'

Mr Paul argued that this was further proof that blood tests after the crash, showing that his son was two times over the drink-drive limit when he died, were flawed. He said: 'If Henri had been drunk, would he have been able to deal with this intruder so properly and so discreetly?

'Do you think the staff at the Ritz would have allowed him to go about his duties?'

The inquest has been shown CCTV footage of Paul at the Ritz that night, and he shows no sign of being drunk.

One camera did reveal, however, that he drank two glasses of Ricard, which contains 45 per cent alcohol, in the hotel bar.

His father added: 'Last week was the first time I had seen these images, the last of my son before he died.

'It tore my heart but also gladdened my heart because these pictures showed he was not drunk. The images show Henri working. He acted smartly and looked smart. That's the way he was.'

Questions have already been raised about how Paul, a modestly paid bachelor, came to have £170,000 stashed away in 15 different bank accounts, as well as £1,200 in his pocket on the night he died.

His former employer, the Ritz's owner Mr Al Fayed, has claimed that the cash shows Paul was in the pay of MI6 or another foreign security service.

But his father rubbished Mr Al Fayed's allegation and posed another intriguing question about his son's behaviour.

Namely, why did Paul ask his parents for a small loan of £1,000 a few months before his death when he had so much money hidden away?

According to his father, Paul said he needed the cash to help him pay for the deposit on a flat he wanted to buy in Paris's Chatelet district.

'I was as surprised as anyone about the mysterious bank accounts and I have been hurt by the insinuations that my son was paid money by the secret services,' said Mr Paul.

'It doesn't add up, because in the months leading up to his death he asked us to lend him some money to buy a flat in Paris.

'If he had that amount of money in his bank accounts, would he have come humbly cap-in-hand to his old dad asking for a loan of about ten thousand francs [£1,000]?

'He had found a flat he liked in the Rue Sainte Anne in the Second Arrondissement. I remember Henri actually showed us some plans, so it was a definite idea on his part. It was in the Chatelet area which was convenient for his work.

'We inherited all the money he had. If he had known about it, would he have come asking for a loan to buy a property? No.

'It's another anomaly, another mystery. It doesn't add up but a lot of things don't add up in this case.'

Tips that Paul received while working at the Ritz are said by friends to be the reason why he had a small fortune tucked away.

His father said: 'Of course, he often got large tips and he put the money in savings accounts. Once Madonna gave him 1,700 francs [£170] because he was part of the Ritz and he handled security. He told me about it.

'I asked him what Madonna was like. He said she was a petit boudin – a little sausage.'

Mr Paul has spent the ten years since the crash unsuccessfully asking the French authorities to return his son's ID card.

Mr Paul said: 'A lot of things we have asked for have never been given to us. Henri always carried a wallet and in his wallet he had a carte d'identité. I wanted the wallet because the card was in it.

'I wanted the photograph because I liked it. The card was never given to us and we were told that it was covered in blood.

'We were also told that Henri had no wallet on him. I don't believe that. We were given things like keys and small change and his watch, which was still working, but there was no wallet and that I find suspicious.

'Maybe it was something to do with the blood on the carte d'identité – there has been much controversy about Henri's blood.

'We are certain that the blood which was analysed, containing excess alcohol and high levels of carbon monoxide, was someone else's. That is why we think they do not want to give us the card.

'Do you think Prince Charles or Mr Al Fayed were treated the same way? No.'

Mr Paul said three families had lost loved ones in the crash. Two were rich and powerful while his own was treated like 'microbes'.

He also recalled the moment when he was told his son had died – and how he was unaware until the next day that Princess Diana had perished as well.

'It was about 4.30am,' said Mr Paul. 'I got a phone call and it was someone from the Ritz. They said there had been an accident and Henri was dead. I mumbled something and I think I put the phone down, and then I told Henri's mother Gisele.

'At the time I was unaware that the Princess and Dodi were dead, too.

It was only the following morning when I heard the news on the radio and put two and two together that I understood what had happened.

'You know, we have lost three of our five sons. We know all about grief. Pascal died of cancer aged just 34 and Jean-Luc died of a heart attack in 2005.'

Last night a spokesman for Mr Al Fayed said: 'Anyone who has relevant information must bring it before the coroner so that the jury can hear it and assess it. That includes the bereaved father of Henri Paul.'

Philippe Lancelin, the spokesman for Judicial Police in Paris, said: 'I cannot comment as the French investigation is closed.'

A spokeswoman for Operation Paget, the British police team assisting the coroner Lord Justice Scott Baker, said: 'It would be inappropriate to comment at this stage

Comments (15)

What I cannot understand is if the Princess Dianas car was leading the pack and the paparazzi where in hot pursuit, who on earth took the photograph showing the driver, the security man and with the Princess looking back at the pursuing paparazzi? If their was a car in front then surely that vehicle would know the answers.

- David Powell, Bridport, UK

synergy777

15-10-2007, 04:50 PM

http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=33998&hl=

The Ritz Diana Videos Prove The Assassination

Joseph Ehrlich, Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
Copyright, 2007, Sender, Berl & Sons Inc.
Exclusive for Rense.com
10-14-7

http://www.rense.com/general78/dm.htm

they had to cut her out, but the door on her side is open, why not open the door, there is no sign of it being cut?

alrick888

15-10-2007, 05:20 PM

That's an interesting point. i never got why it was difficult to get her out, she was on the right side.

The other stuff you posted about those two pictures is complete bollocks, a typical example of very bad "conspiracy research".

Why? If you look at the whole series of which those two pictures are part you will find that these pictures were taken when the car left the Ritz. All that stuff is just complete made-up crap.

synergy777

15-10-2007, 05:40 PM

the doctored hair is rubbish. lets look at the real stuff.

a secret getaway at the rear of the hotel with a dummy car at front of the hotel to serve as a diversion. so why did the driver go to the rear of the hotel and wave to people across the road?

surely the whole point of the getaway using the rear of the hotel was avoid detection by the paparazzi, so why signal to people waiting at the back of the hotel. why not go out too them and move them away, or wait, stay another hour in dodi dad's hotel, the ritz. the whole point of using the rear entrance was have some privacy, no media attention.

we know from the pictures, that there were people at the back of the hotel, the photos taken are proof, where the pcitures taken by the people who the driver waved to?

synergy777

15-10-2007, 05:54 PM

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=487731&in_page_id=1770

Diana inquest: Witness saw 'major white flash' just before crash
Last updated at 16:53pm on 15th October 2007

A motorist who witnessed the crash which killed Diana, Princess of Wales recalled today that he saw a 'major white flash' in the Alma underpass.

Francois Levistre was driving in front of the Mercedes when the fatal collision happened in the Paris tunnel more than 10 years ago in August 1997.

Speaking by video link from the French capital for the inquest into the deaths of Diana and her lover Dodi Fayed, Mr Levistre described how the Princess's car was overtaken by a motorbike inside the underpass.

He told the jury he saw a very bright flash - like the light from a police radar - and it had been directed at the Mercedes.

Mr Levistre said, speaking through a translator: "I realised there was this major white flash of the motorbike in front of the Mercedes, in front of the car.

"I was nearly at the exit of the tunnel and I realised that because I heard the noise of the motorbike within the tunnel."

He said the flash was like when you "switch on the lights and you can see clearly".

"I just wondered what happened because the light was like you were caught by the police in a radar," he added. Ian Burnett QC, counsel for the inquest, asked: "This flash was very bright?"

Mr Levistre replied: "Very. The light even came into my car."

He added: "The light was not directed towards me. It was directed towards the car which was behind."

The witness, who saw the events in his rear view mirror, described how the Mercedes veered from side to side before it turned around.

"When I saw the light, I looked into the mirror... I saw the car going from left to right to left again to get within the pillar.

"The car had no light any longer. Everything was switched off."

Mr Levistre, who stopped near the exit from the Pont de l'Alma tunnel, saw the motorcycle passenger get off, approach the car, look inside, and make a hand gesture to the bike's driver before they drove away.

He told the jury, sitting at the High Court in London, that the bike's occupants looked at him before passing his vehicle and leaving the underpass.

Mr Levistre also said he saw a small white car in the tunnel, but maintained that there was no contact between this and the Mercedes.

He could not confirm that it was a Fiat Uno.

Mr Levistre was with his wife, their daughter Marie-Agnes and her boyfriend - now husband - David Le Ny, on a night out in Paris at the time.

They were walking back to their car from the Eiffel Tower nearby.

Mrs Catheline said: "When they were already in the tunnel, under the bridge we heard noises like two cars bumping each other."

Mr Le Ny said he remembered seeing a large dark car speeding towards them into the tunnel.

"It was going very fast, I remember the noise coming from the engine... I certainly made a comment, stating that they were crazy or something like that."

Mr and Mrs Catheline also told how they had seen a man running towards them into the tunnel almost immediately after the crash.

The inquest continues ...

could be flash guns used by the motorcyclist and RC hijacking of the car, hence no lights/power. with white car being used to nudge the mercedes.

this is the "mental picture" i get.

snoopsnuffleopagus

15-10-2007, 06:52 PM

Cordial Felicitations:

What of the Testimony of the 'Survivor' of the 'Crash'?.

The Former Elite Unit Military Veteran who was Dianes Bodyguard.

I recall a video interview where he stated: (paraphrased) If I thought the driver was drunk, I would have changed drivers. I would not have placed Diana and her companion in danger.

He seemed an expert and capable Man with acute powers of discernment.

Syn! got anything on him?

Kind Regards: Snoopsnuffleopagus

alrick888

15-10-2007, 07:10 PM

Ok, yeah. Apart from the RC that seems plausible.

I think I will repost part of Stuart Wilde's eleven Diana visions here. Stuart is an author and sort of a psychic, who has what he calls visions regularly. He had these in 2002. You can find all the visions if you scroll down at:

http://www.stuartwilde.com/Articles/SW_articles_diana_visions_true.html

December 28th, 2002

The Diana visions first appeared as short video clips in the morph over a year ago. I didn't post them here at the time as the Diana story seemed a long way off and the visions came in bit by bit over months, not in a linear consecutive order. Then in November this year I saw a vision of Diana striding up to a group of men; she said forcefully to one of them, "Come on Yves, let's go." So, I reckoned the Diana story must be getting closer to popping out of the box.

Here I've rearranged the eleven Diana visions that I have seen chronologically, so they are easier to follow. And I've added a few comments as I go along, as well as my summary at the end as per usual.

The Driver

The first Diana related vision I saw came in July 2001 as mini-video in the morph. It was of Dodi's driver Henri Paul talking to a group of men. He was not at the Ritz hotel but at some other location, an office somewhere in France. All the men were standing approximately in a circle; Mr. Paul was leaning in slightly, listening intently. He seemed to be receiving instructions and at the end of the short ten-second clip, he nodded and bowed slightly, and he shook one man's hand.

(We think this is the morph's record of how the caper was set up. There is an audio track to this clip but I didn't get to hear it or what was being said).

The Money

In the next morph clip, I'm watching a scene at night. I see the car that was involved in the crash, reflected off the hood of the car is light from a street lamp. A man comes up and starts to place piles of cash on the hood. It is 120,000 French francs, about $US 20,000.

(We reckon this was the down payment of Henri Paul's pay off, but he was tricked. He thought he was being paid to take Dodi and Diana someplace. He wasn't told the full plan).

The Rear-Door Mechanic

In another morph video some weeks later, I watch as a car mechanic kneels down on the ground next to the rear door of the car on the driver's side. He is fiddling with something just inside the door close to the floor.

(Neither Dodi nor Diana wore seat belts–maybe the rear passenger seat belts were rendered inoperable).

The Other Two Mechanics

Next, I'm watching another vision in the form of a video in which the car is jacked up on the driver's side about eighteen inches off the ground, and two mechanics are working under the car in the area between the driver's door and the left front wheel. These characters feel military and very spooky. I watch them from behind for about thirty seconds before the morph video clicks off.

synergy777

15-10-2007, 07:13 PM

good stuff.

maybe i watch spooks too much, lol

synergy777

16-10-2007, 01:42 AM

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7045341.stm

Diana jury told of 'white flash'

Princess Diana died in a car crash in Paris in 1997

A motorist has told the inquest into the death of Princess Diana about seeing a "major white flash" in the tunnel before the fatal crash.

Francois Levistre, who was driving in front of the princess's car, described how the princess's car was overtaken by a motorbike inside the underpass.

Mr Levistre, speaking from Paris, said he watched events through his mirror.

Other witnesses have said the Mercedes may have suffered a "bump" with another large, dark car.

'Two cars'

Speaking through a translator, Mr Levistre told the inquest: "I realised there was this major white flash of the motorbike in front of the Mercedes, in front of the car.

"I was nearly at the exit of the tunnel and I realised that because I heard the noise of the motorbike within the tunnel."

Mr Levistre, who watched events unfold in his rear-view mirror, said he saw the Mercedes veer from side to side before it turned around.

"The car had no light any longer. Everything was switched off," he said.

The witness then saw the motorcycle passenger get off, approach the car, look inside and gesture to the bike's driver before the pair drove away.

Jean-Claude Catheline and his wife Annick told the inquest they saw two cars enter the tunnel side-by-side.

They heard the sound of a collision as they walked near the underpass entrance in the early hours of 31 August 1997.

Speaking via video-link, they said they heard tyres screech moments later.

The couple, who were speaking from Paris, told the inquest sitting at the High Court in London: "As soon as the car disappeared from our view we heard what sounded like the bodywork bumping, I think that this noise was before the car entered the tunnel."

'Screeching' tyres

An excerpt from his original police statement was read to the court by Richard Horwell QC.

The statement read: "Almost immediately I heard a second noise, very, very loud, quite different from the first, it was a dull noise and followed by a second, identical noise."

And, as he addressed the court, Mr Catheline said: "I heard the tyres screeching on the road."

The couple had been walking back to their car from the Eiffel Tower nearby following a night out when they witnessed events moments before the accident in the Pont de L'Alma tunnel that killed the princess and her lover.

Mrs Catheline told the court: "When they were already in the tunnel, under the bridge we heard noises like two cars bumping each other."

Her son-in-law - David Le Ny - who had been with the couple, along with their daughter, remembered seeing a large dark car speeding towards them into the tunnel.

He said: "It was going very fast, I remember the noise coming from the engine... I certainly made a comment, stating that they were crazy or something like that."

synergy777

16-10-2007, 02:23 PM

they changed the title of the article to white flash to "from hitmen!"

i commens them for their bravery, daily mail thank you.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=487731&in_page_id=1770

BY REBECCA ENGLISH and REBECCA CAMBER - More by this author »

Last updated at 10:12am on 16th October 2007

Diana inquest: Witness saw 'major white flash from hitmen' just before crash

A bright light was flashed at Princess Diana's car moments before it crashed into a concrete pillar, a witness claimed yesterday.

A motorbike overtook the Mercedes inside the Pont de l'Alma tunnel in Paris before a 'major white flash' like a police radar was directed at the car, Francois Levistre told the inquest into the princess's death.

The Mercedes veered across the carriageway several times before ploughing into the pillar, said Mr Levistre, who was driving in front of the princess's car through the underpass.

Other witnesses claimed to have seen a large dark car bump the Mercedes as it entered the tunnel at a 'crazy' speed moments before the crash, the inquest at the High Court in London heard.

Mohamed Al Fayed claims Diana and his son Dodi were murdered ten years ago in an Establishment plot ordered by Prince Philip.

Mr Al Fayed says secret service agents blinded the Mercedes's driver, Henri Paul, with a flash gun and it was part of the conspiracy to make the crash look like an accident.

French authorities and former Metropolitan Police Commissioner Lord Stevens - who investigated the crash on behalf of the coroner - have dismissed this theory.

Jail: Witness Francois Levistre

They doubt whether Mr Levistre, the only eyewitness who speaks of a 'big white flash' in the tunnel, could have seen the detail he claimed while driving at speeds of up to 60mph.

Mr Levistre had given several different accounts of the incident, the court was told.

He had also served time in prison for possessing an illegal weapon and had been held in connection with an alleged plot to sell a child, the jury heard.

Speaking through a video link from Paris, Mr Levistre said that on August 31, 1997 he was returning home from a shopping trip with his wife, Roselyn, and their ten-year-old son.

He was driving at around 60mph when he saw in his rear-view mirror the headlights of a large car overtaken by a motorbike.

He said: "I realised there was this major white flash of the motorbike in front of the Mercedes, in front of the car."

Asked by Ian Burnett QC, counsel for the coroner, whether the light was bright, he said: "Very. The light even came into my car [even though] it was not directed towards me."

Mr Levistre said: "Then I saw the car going from left to right to left again to go within the pillar."

He stopped near the tunnel exit and claimed he saw the motorcycle passenger get off, approach the car, look inside and make a hand gesture to the bike's driver before they sped away.

He also claimed to have seen a small white car in the tunnel - but said there was no contact between this and the Mercedes.

Asked why he did not leave his car to help, Mr Levistre said: "Fear...I thought they were hitmen. We thought the two cyclists had come to kill the people in the car."

However, David le Ny, who was with his girlfriend and her parents Jean Claude and Annick Catheline at the time, described the Mercedes being bumped by another large dark car as it sped into the tunnel.

In a statement to French police at the time, he said: "It [the Mercedes] was going so fast. I can't say what speed but I think it was travelling over 100 kilometres per hour [62mph]. In fact I actually said to the people I was with 'what an idiot'."

Mr Catheline told the court that he saw two large dark cars travelling quickly side-by-side between 20in and 3ft apart as they went into the tunnel.

He said: "As soon as the car disappeared from our view we heard what sounded like the bodywork bumping."

Immediately after the sound of the crash, the party described £10million is the estimated cost of the inquest into the death of Diana seeing a mysterious white man running into the tunnel.

Mr Burnett yesterday pointed to inconsistencies in Mr Levistre's evidence to the inquest and French police.

These included how many motorbikes were following the Mercedes and whether he even saw the car actually collide with the pillar

He was asked by Mr Burnett why, despite being a witness to a serious car accident, he did not stop to offer assistance.

Mr Levistre said he was scared but Mr Burnett suggested that the real reason he did not wish to get involved was because he had 'been in trouble' with the French authorities before.

Mr Levistre admitted he had been jailed for two and a half years for possessing an 'illegal weapon'.

Mr Burnett continued: "Am I right you have [also] been in difficulties with the authorities in connection with offering a child to a German industrialist?"

This prompted an irritated Mr Levistre to explode: "Let's not talk about this, because I tell you that it is a total mistake."

Mr Levistre served a jail sentence for theft, burglary and fraud.

On his release in 1989 he was remanded in custody on suspicion of trying to sell a baby he had fathered with a woman 20 years his junior to a German couple for £5,000, according to French newspaper reports. He was later released without charge.

Last night, after hours of questioning, Mr Levistre refused to give any more evidence.

His wife, Roselyn, who has previously given evidence to police contradicting her husband, then refused to take the stand.

synergy777

16-10-2007, 02:29 PM

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=487920&in_page_id=1770&ct=5

The horror scene when I found Diana dying, by the first man at the Paris crash

Last updated at 14:06pm on 16th October 2007

One of the first people to reach the scene of the crash which killed Diana, Princess of Wales described today the horror he saw.

James Huth told the Princess's inquest he was unable to see her in the back of the mangled Mercedes because she was trapped so low in the footwell and obscured by the body of her lover Dodi Fayed.

He spoke to bodyguard Trevor Rees Jones - now known as Trevor Rees - who was conscious but severely injured, in the front next to driver Henri Paul, who had been killed.

Speaking by video link from Paris, where the crash happened in 1997, Mr Huth said he attempted to calm a "panicking" Mr Rees, whose jaw was hanging loose.

He then called the emergency services but told them that there were only three people in the car, with one survivor, as Diana was not visible.

When his friend Lionel Ronssin, who was also at the scene, was later informed that the Princess was involved in the crash, he was initially incredulous

Mr Huth, a film-maker, told the jury he witnessed a paparazzo fighting with a bystander in the underpass minutes after the crash and before the emergency services arrived.

"The man was trying to catch his camera, he was screaming that he didn't have the right to take pictures," he said.

Mr Huth said he heard the sound of screeching tyres and two distinct smashing sounds while he was sitting in his parents' apartment on the banks of the River Seine.

Realising that there had been a crash inside the Pont de l'Alma Tunnel below, he ran out to help and was at the scene within around two minutes.

"When I approached the car, there was smoke and the sound of the horn," he said.

"I saw the two air bags that were open, the driver unfortunately had his head inside and it wasn't moving.

"He was supposedly dead, and this guy was panicking on the right, he had his jaw hanging and he was panicking.

"He was trying to move and I talked to him and told him in French to stay quiet, that it was going to be OK, that people were going to take care of him and he had to just try to be quiet, to calm down."

He said two men approached the car and tried to open the door but he stopped them.

He said that, as a former dentist, he had some emergency medical training and was aware of the danger of moving people with potential spinal injuries.

It was then that he looked in the back and saw Dodi's body.

"I approached the car and saw the legs of a man, I didn't know who those persons were, I didn't know until at the end anyway.

"I saw the broken leg, that I remember clearly, of a man in blue jeans I guess, with a double fracture under the knee and a boot like a cowboy's.

"I didn't see what I learned after - that there was another person underneath, the Princess.

"I didn't see that because I didn't approach the car enough, I guess."

He added: "I got close enough ... to speak to the bodyguard - I know now it was the bodyguard - that was still alive, but not close enough to see that there was another person in the car, under the seat."

The court heard that Mr Huth's family had lived by the tunnel for more than 20 years by 1997 and had witnessed many accidents but none like that.

A section from Mr Huth's original statement to police was read, which said: "Having known the location for 20 years, I cannot think of why a car driving that fast would have to brake at that point unless there was something in its way."

Asked today about that comment, he said: "It's a subjective analysis but most of the accidents that I've seen were on the other side of the tunnel with cars coming out of the tunnel.

"Even though the tunnel was tricky, it was the first time I really heard screeching from a car coming fast inside the tunnel."

Mr Ronssin, who had been spending the evening at Mr Huth's flat, stayed at the edge of the underpass and did not go inside while his friend was assisting at the scene.

synergy777

17-10-2007, 12:42 AM

vera susa

17-10-2007, 08:15 AM

Just Now On Spooks, Bbc 1, They Highlighted false Flags and emp Pulse Weapons That Take Out The Electronics Of Cars. Could They Have Use An emp Gun On The Mercedes In The Diana Accident, With Flash Gun Aswell?

Yes, fun show that, "SPOOKS".
I couldn't help but notice that in OZ, even the re-runs were
"spookily" "TIMELY" with current/impending 'events'.

But I love being part of THE COMMONWEALTH just for the
"ENLIGHTENING" 'entertainments' it's members produce,
even if there was no other reason.

Like the OZ, ABC Late Night/Early Morning classic old movies,
that most find painfully corny...I dare anyone with an once of
code reading ability, to watch a few weeks offerings and NOT
notice the "Future News" being told to those 'with eyes and ears'.

Oh, and even better still for parents of 'Know All Rebels';
sit them down to a few of those EARLY 1930's movies
and they'll see that not only didn't they invent BINGE DRINKING,
MIND ALTERING DRUG TAKING, COSTLY WILD 'free' SEX,
PLAYING AT OCCULT/ESOTERIC BS and DANGEROUS UGLY ARTS/MUSIC etc.,
but that the only difference between them and their Grandparents
who lived to produce their parents,
is that they DID get older and WISER.
(WARNING! This won't work for members of the Elite,
as they still Worship their DEMONIC Trail Blazers,
because they still think they're winning...IDIOTS!)

synergy777

18-10-2007, 09:35 PM

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/articles/news/news.html?in_article_id=488369&in_page_id=1770&ct=5

WAS Diana to wed? Jury see receipt for 'engagement ring' from Dodi
Last updated at 20:13pm on 18th October 2007

Dodi Fayed bought an £11,600 'engagement ring' hours before his death in a car crash with Diana, Princess of Wales, the couple's inquest heard today.

The jury, sitting at London's High Court, was shown a copy of a receipt dated August 30 1997, recovered after the couple's death, with the words "bague fiancaille" - meaning engagement ring.

The jury was shown a copy of a receipt dated August 30 1997 with the words 'bague fiancaille' - meaning engagement ring

Watch the CCTV footage of Dodi in the Paris jewellery store

The court heard that a ring from Monte Carlo jeweller Alberto Repossi's "Dis-moi oui" range - meaning "Tell me yes" - was recovered from Dodi's flat in Paris after the tragedy.

The jury also saw extensive CCTV footage from Repossi's Paris store, which is in the same square as the Ritz Hotel, showing Dodi paying a visit to inspect jewellery after the shop had closed to the public that afternoon.

Dodi is seen returning to the Ritz's Imperial Suite, where Diana spent the afternoon, carrying only a brochure from the shop.

But the footage goes on to show Claude Roulet, the assistant to the hotel's president, returning to the store shortly afterwards and picking up an item in a bag which he takes back to the couple's room.

CCTV: The images of Dodi al Fayed, on the left of the table, choosing the 'engagement' ring

Display: A member of staff points out various rings inside a cabinet to Dodi (centre)

Footage then shows him depositing the bag in the hotel's strong room some time before the couple return to Dodi's flat.

Detective Chief Inspector Paul Carpenter of the Metropolitan Police, who showed the CCTV footage to the jury, also confirmed to the court that a "Dis-moi oui" ring had been recovered from Dodi's flat off the Champs Elysees after the couple's deaths.

Diana and Dodi were killed in a crash in their Mercedes in the Pont de l'Alma Tunnel in Paris in the early hours of August 31, 1997.

Dodi's father Mohamed al Fayed maintains that Diana was pregnant with Dodi's child and that they were due to get engaged.

The jury has heard he believes Dodi was set to present Diana with the ring that night.

Mr al Fayed claims the couple chose the ring together earlier in the summer and Dodi was picking it up that day after it had been sent away for sizing.

Selection: Trays of rings are produced by jeweller Alberto Repossi for Dodi to examine

Choice: Dodi points to one he likes from the selection of rings

Shopping: Dodi, in the centre, went to the exclusive store between visits to the Riitz Hotel

Diana and Dodi: Was a wedding on the cards?

But the coroner Lord Justice Scott Baker told the jury earlier this month that there was "conflicting evidence" on the subject.

He said: "The issue is whether this was in truth an engagement ring chosen by Dodi and Diana together at Repossi in Monte Carlo and collected by Dodi from Repossi in Place Vendome on August 30, 1997 or whether it was chosen by Dodi alone that day, to give to Diana on the night they died, perhaps in the hope that she would agree to marry him or perhaps just as a present."

The court heard yesterday from photographer Thierry Orban that rumours were rife among paparazzi gathered outside the Ritz on August 30 that Diana was due to make an imminent announcement of a pregnancy or engagement.

The footage, seen by the jury for the first time today, shows Dodi being driven around 50 metres across the square to Repossi's at 5.40pm, rather than simply walking.

Henrietta Hill, representing Mr Fayed, suggested today that this may have been because of the paparazzi gathered outside.

Mr Repossi himself, his wife and several members of staff are seen standing ready inside the shop for several minutes before Dodi strides in wearing dark glasses.

Dodi is then escorted downstairs to the main sales area and taken to a cabinet before several pieces are laid out on tables for him to inspect.

He is also seen pointing to something in a brochure.

Although Dodi is seen leaving the shop after just eight minutes, Mr Roulet stays on for a time making notes on a piece of paper.

Footage from the Ritz CCTV system then shows Dodi going back to the suite, where Diana had been waiting - at one point receiving a visit from someone who appears to be a hairdresser - carrying a Repossi brochure.

When Mr Roulet returns to the hotel, he is seen going to the couple's suite, also carrying a brochure, and spending a few minutes inside.

Less than 20 minutes later, he returns before eventually going back to the jewellers, which was pointed out to the jury on their recent visit to Paris.

Mr Carpenter highlighted how further CCTV shows Mr Repossi's wife emerging from a back room with an item and gesturing as if to put a ring on her left hand.

Moments later Mr Repossi brings out a piece of paper which, Mr Carpenter told the court, appeared to be advertising material for the "Dis-moi oui" range.

"In the original video, I froze the image on two occasions, the first when he shows it to Mr Roulet, the second when he took the sheet back to the office and put it on the desk," he told the court.

"In that, the image is on the piece of paper.

"Although not clear, I'm satisfied that they are one and the same as the 'Dis-moi oui' advertisement."

The jury was shown a glossy sheet advertising "Dis-moi oui" rings as well as a more formal Repossi brochure which the court heard had been provided by Mr Roulet.

He is then seen signing a book and leaving with a small bag to go to the Ritz where he stops at a desk to write a series of numbers on a piece of paper, which was itself shown to the court.

Mr Carpenter said that the first number - 115,000 - was the undiscounted price in French Francs for a "Dis-moi oui" ring.

The footage then shows him stopping off at the suite before taking the bag on to be deposited in the hotel strong room.

Mr Carpenter told the jury that the receipt from Repossi's recovered after the couple's deaths referred to two rings rather than one.

As well as a 115,000 Franc "bague fiancaille", there was also a more expensive "Etoile" - or "star" - ring.

The jury was told that in 1997, 115,000 Francs equates to between £11,500 and £11,650 depending on exchange rates while 600,000 Francs was worth up to £60,000.

But he told the court that this second ring was returned in September 1997, a few days after the couple's deaths.

The court also heard that a list of prices for seven items of jewellery including at least three rings had been faxed to the Ritz a week beforehand on August 23.

Mr Carpenter confirmed that Mr Roulet was believed to have taken this with him, tucked inside the brochure, that day.

The inquest was adjourned and continues on Monday

check the link for the pics and receipt

greenleaf

05-12-2007, 05:15 PM

Diana Driver Henri Paul Linked To French Spy Service
By Sky News SkyNews (http://uk.news.yahoo.com/skynews/20071205/tuk-diana-driver-henri-paul-linked-to-fr-45dbed5_1.html) - 11 minutes agoThe driver of the car in which Diana, Princess of Wales, was killed was in regular contact with the French secret service, a court has heard.

Henri Paul, the deputy head of security at the Ritz Hotel in Paris, liaised with police and intelligence services about important guests when required, Diana's inquest was told.

Claude Roulet, assistant to the president of the Ritz, told how Mr Paul personally put him in contact with the Direction de la Surveillance du Territoire (DST) when an important Russian diplomat was coming to stay.

He said the hotel was often asked about the movements of high-profile guests by the police, information he felt he "had to" provide.

Mr Roulet told the couple's inquest: "The French police knew about the arrival of some guests and when they needed to have a look at what they did they asked the security services at the Ritz to have some tips about what they did and when they came in and went out and who they met and so on."

Mohamed al Fayed, whose son Dodi was killed in the crash with Diana in August 1997, is convinced the couple were murdered in an MI6-led plot on the orders of the Duke of Edinburgh.

He believes Mr Paul was in the pay of spies and acting on their orders in the early hours of August 31 1997, when he drove Diana and Dodi through the Pont de l'Alma Tunnel in Paris where they crashed.

The jury has heard that during the summer of 1997, Mr Paul was in fact the acting head of security at the hotel, because of a vacancy in the department.

Mr al Fayed has raised suspicions about how Mr Paul, who earned between £1,500 and £1,700 a month, came to have the equivalent of £1,256 on his person at the time of his death in the crash.

The jury has also been told that he had a string of bank accounts with assets of around £170,000 in cash and shares.

His parents and friends have suggested the money came from tips from rich guests while others have suggested it was a float he needed for his work.

Mr Roulet suggested the money could have come from Mr Fayed himself for "special assistance" during visits to the hotel.

Didn't David already say this a few year ago?

synergy777

10-12-2007, 04:44 PM

http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/article.asp?ID=7653

Duke's aide to face Diana inquest
Press Association – Updated December 9, 2007

The Duke of Edinburgh's top aide is to appear at the inquest into the death of Diana, Princess of Wales, this week.

Private secretary Brigadier Sir Miles Hunt-Davis is certain to be asked about Harrods tycoon Mohamed al Fayed's claim that the Duke ordered Diana's "murder" in a car crash in Paris in 1997.

The Princess's close friend Rosa Monkton and her stepmother Raine, Countess Spencer, are also listed to give evidence as the inquest enters its 11th week.

In a key few days of evidence Alberto Repossi - the jeweller at the centre of claims that Dodi Fayed had bought an an engagement ring for the Princess - and MP Nicholas Soames, whom Diana allegedly "feared", will also be called.

Others listed include Philippe Doucin, a barman who says he sold drinks to driver Henri Paul at the Ritz Hotel in Paris on the night of the crash, and Dr Arnaud Derossi, who co-ordinated the medical response at the scene of the tragedy in the Pont de l'Alma tunnel in the early hours of August 31 1997.

Mohamed al Fayed, whose son Dodi was killed in the crash with Diana and Henri Paul, is convinced the couple were murdered in an MI6 plot which he believes was ordered by the Duke of Edinburgh.

He believes the couple were poised to announce their engagement when they died and that Diana was pregnant with Dodi's child.

Sir Miles is likely to be asked about the whereabouts of correspondence between the Duke and the Princess, which her former butler Paul Burrell claims existed - part of a box of correspondence dubbed the "crown jewels".

The coroner Lord Justice Scott Baker has already told the jury that it is probable the letters from the Duke existed but added: "Where they went and whether they still exist remains a mystery."

Lord Stevens' Operation Paget report into the conspiracy allegation cites Diana's friend Roberto Devorik as listing Nicholas Soames - a friend of the Prince of Wales - as one of three people Diana allegedly "feared" alongside the Duke of Edinburgh and Lord Robert Fellowes.

www.guardian.co.uk/uklatest/story/0,,-7134484,00.html