PDA

View Full Version : UAF not prosecuted for throwing darts at BNP


eternal_spirit
23-03-2010, 10:40 PM
March 23, 2010 http://bnp.org.uk/files/2010/03/snapshot-of-dart-thrower.jpgThe Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has refused to prosecute anybody for the public violence and assault with a deadly weapon — captured on film and broadcast on satellite television — committed by members of a state-sponsored UAF mob against Nick Griffin at College Green in June last year.
The attack was in fact far more serious than just a few eggs being thrown, as the video evidence showed.
At least two clearly identifiable UAF supporters were filmed throwing darts, one of which struck a BNP security man, Stuart Freeman, in the chest.
Despite the ample and crystal clear video and photographic evidence, the CPS has told the police that there is insufficient evidence to secure a prosecution.
“The Westminster Serious Crimes Unit have been very thorough in their investigation and amassed an overwhelming case,” Mr Griffin said.
“It seems, however, in this case that the UAF, which is funded by the trade unions who are in turn funded by the Government, is apparently above the law.
“The video evidence shows members of the UAF crowd throwing darts at BNP people. If that does not constitute assault with a weapon, then nothing does,” Mr Griffin said.
“To say that we are appalled at the CPS’s decision is an understatement.
“All this does is convince us even further that justice in Britain is terminal, murdered by decades of political correctness imposed by successive Tory and Labour regimes.
“The CPS decision is in effect an invitation to anti-democratic thugs to commit acts of serious violence in public, safe in the knowledge that even if they are filmed in flagrante delicto, they will be protected by the CPS,” Mr Griffin said.
“The decision will prove to the public that the establishment is ganging up on the BNP and is even prepared to condone acts of violence.
“We are convinced that this decision will backfire. Increasing numbers of the public have become aware of the insidious destruction of our nation and that the BNP offers the only solution to this madness.”
A video of the UAF gangster throwing a dart is below.


YouTube - Broadcast Yourself.

eternal_spirit
23-03-2010, 11:08 PM
committed by members of a state-sponsored UAF mob the UAF, which is funded by the trade unions who are in turn funded by the Government, is apparently above the law.




This is what he's reffering to

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=109070

oioioi
23-03-2010, 11:25 PM
You're quoting and explaining yourself to yourself?

:o

eternal_spirit
24-03-2010, 12:17 AM
You're quoting and explaining yourself to yourself?

:o
:D

griffinman
24-03-2010, 01:02 AM
beard and ponytail? Gotta be oioioi

lol

oioioi
24-03-2010, 01:23 AM
beard and ponytail? Gotta be oioioi

lol

I'm better at darts than that.

eternal_spirit
24-03-2010, 01:28 AM
beard and ponytail? Gotta be oioioi

lol
Nah no piercings.
I'm better at darts than that.
DIY piercings? you must have a good aim.

jonahmc
24-03-2010, 10:05 AM
That dart thrower is a vile streak of piss. Typical sneaky and moronic behaviour from the government backed creeps, the UAF.

jesuitsdidit
24-03-2010, 05:08 PM
es
this is not the first time youve quoted from a source with no link recently
i hope u r not trying to get this site taken down?
that wdnt b v good for the truthers would it?

eternal_spirit
31-03-2010, 12:14 AM
es
this is not the first time youve quoted from a source with no link recently
i hope u r not trying to get this site taken down?
that wdnt b v good for the truthers would it?
What's with the accusations, not sure what you're getting at? I'm getting de ja vu.


:)

http://bnp.org.uk/category/news/

eternal_spirit
31-03-2010, 12:18 AM
Okie dokie let's rock "n" roll! :D

Dart thrower could have potentially murdered someone if it had hit them in the eye.

If that plonker had of been a BNP member then it would have been allover the news, and he would probably be locked up by now.

Have you lot not figured out what's going on yet? A handfull of smart folk will have....

jiffy
31-03-2010, 01:25 AM
Hmm a dart with no flight:rolleyes:

Had to laugh at the description given "UFA gangster" yeah he does have a slight resemblance to Ronnie Kray :rolleyes:

The parasite Griffin wouldn't of arranged photo's of the Dart in a security guards chest, IF it had happened. Or are we suggesting that he (security guard) was Batflink:eek:

eternal_spirit
31-03-2010, 01:26 AM
UAF prefer hammers
The A-frame itself was overturned and the skins damaged. When the BNP members got out of the vehicle to defend themselves, they were violently attacked by the racially mixed group of Labour Party thugs. Liverpool activist Tony Ward was stuck twice by a claw hammer wielded by a black thug. He was hit once in the eye and once on the head.
http://newsimg.bbc.co.uk/media/images/45566000/jpg/_45566905_bnp.jpg


Mr Ward was knocked unconscious and picked up by fellow BNP activist Andrew Tierney, who dragged him to safety. Mr Ward was later removed by a third BNP man in his vehicle.

The A-frame was righted, and the BNP men left the scene. During this violent assault, the police were nowhere to be seen — they were far too busy visiting the next venue where they thought the BNP was holding the road show so they could intimidate that owner as well.

Mr Ward received eleven stitches later in hospital.

“If the Labour Party thinks they can break us with their street thugs, they are wrong,” Mr Ward told BNP News. “We are back, stronger than ever before, and we will not stop until we have rescued this country from the immigration invasion and Islamification nightmare to which the Tories and Labour have subjected us.”

jiffy
31-03-2010, 01:34 AM
Interesting... bit like Hollywood, you hit the person not once but twice with a claw hammer without fracturing their skull indeed they only needed eleven stitches.


http://www.brillianttv.co.uk/timmymallett/images/timmysessionsept20022.jpg

eternal_spirit
31-03-2010, 01:40 AM
Have you lot not figured out what's going on yet? A handfull of smart folk will have....
I know do you?

mynameis
31-03-2010, 03:15 AM
A video of the UAF gangster throwing a dart is below.[/media]

Was he the only one throwing darts? The video shows something, but I didn't see a dart hit anyone on the video.

oioioi
31-03-2010, 06:58 AM
I know do you?

Talking to yourself again?

"Won't somebody think of the Nazi's!!!!!"

gremlin
05-04-2010, 04:15 PM
we all know the UAF can do what ever they want as they are sponsored by the government.

eternal wheel
05-04-2010, 06:06 PM
Interesting... bit like Hollywood, you hit the person not once but twice with a claw hammer without fracturing their skull indeed they only needed eleven stitches.


http://www.brillianttv.co.uk/timmymallett/images/timmysessionsept20022.jpg
it's the fucking UAF. weedy gay pinko hippie hand-wringers. i'm surprised one could even pick a hammer up, let alone wield one.:rolleyes:

[edit]
nice pic of timmy tho!

peace3000
05-04-2010, 06:35 PM
it's the fucking UAF. weedy gay pinko hippie hand-wringers.

At least they're showing up vile racists like the BNP and EDL for what they are :)

geezer661
05-04-2010, 07:04 PM
At least they're showing up vile racists like the BNP and EDL for what they are :)


fighting fascism by stopping a democratically elected man from speaking.

you not see the conflict there?

geezer661
05-04-2010, 07:05 PM
Interesting... bit like Hollywood, you hit the person not once but twice with a claw hammer without fracturing their skull indeed they only needed eleven stitches.


http://www.brillianttv.co.uk/timmymallett/images/timmysessionsept20022.jpg


by his injuries u not think it possible they hit him with the claw end of the hammer?

Or are you like duhhhh whats a hammer?

peace3000
05-04-2010, 07:29 PM
At least they're showing up vile racists like the BNP and EDL for what they are :)

fighting fascism by stopping a democratically elected man from speaking.

you not see the conflict there?

A line needs to be drawn when it comes to free speech.

Griffin and his ilk are nothing but racial-hatred inciters.

geezer661
05-04-2010, 07:34 PM
A line needs to be drawn when it comes to free speech.

Griffin and his ilk are nothing but racial-hatred inciters.

you mean just allow speech that you agree with?

eternal wheel
05-04-2010, 07:49 PM
At least they're showing up vile racists like the BNP and EDL for what they are :)
what? a movement with a HUGE grassroots support across the whole of britian?
funny how they only get called racists by the UAF and other far left weirdos.

eternal wheel
05-04-2010, 07:51 PM
you mean just allow speech that you agree with?

+1
that'd make peace3000 a fascist then......;)

geezer661
05-04-2010, 07:51 PM
what? a movement with a HUGE grassroots support across the whole of britian?
funny how they only get called racists by the UAF and other far left weirdos.

+1

oioioi
05-04-2010, 08:31 PM
what? a movement with a HUGE grassroots support across the whole of britian?
funny how they only get called racists by the UAF and other far left weirdos.

They're hardly likely to declare themselves racist are they?

eternal wheel
05-04-2010, 08:38 PM
They're hardly likely to declare themselves racist are they?

to quote micheal portillo, you know, the whet tory jewish gay, about as anti bnp as you can get, "there is no racism in the bnp". i know he said it, coz i heard him say it, in an interview on R4.

oioioi
05-04-2010, 08:41 PM
to quote micheal portillo, you know, the whet tory jewish gay, about as anti bnp as you can get, "there is no racism in the bnp". i know he said it, coz i heard him say it, in an interview on R4.

Case closed then.
:rolleyes:

What was the recent change to membership admission about again?

eternal wheel
05-04-2010, 08:48 PM
Case closed then.
:rolleyes:
if you say so. :rolleyes:

What was the recent change to membership admission about again?
to allow non-indegenous english people to join.
was skin colour mentioned?
only by the far left. ;)

oioioi
05-04-2010, 08:56 PM
to allow non-indegenous english people to join.
was skin colour mentioned?
only by the far left. ;)

The British National party was plunged into chaos yesterday, weeks before the general election, when a court ordered it to remove central beliefs and policies about race from its constitution.

In a landmark injunction at the Central London county court, a judge found that the BNP's membership policy remained discriminatory, even after a direct whites-only clause was removed last month.


http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/mar/12/bnp-racist-membership-rules-outlawed

geezer661
05-04-2010, 08:58 PM
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/mar/12/bnp-racist-membership-rules-outlawed

but thts the left wing guardians interpretation of it

robdoo
05-04-2010, 09:00 PM
These thugs are doing there best to destroy any semblance of democracy this country has. Throwing darts into a crowd, attacking someone with a claw hammer to the head? Both assailants should be charged with attempted murder. That's if the police can actually find the culprits.

oioioi
05-04-2010, 09:01 PM
but thts the left wing guardians interpretation of it

And the laws.

geezer661
05-04-2010, 09:02 PM
And the laws.


yes created by the fascist left wing

oioioi
05-04-2010, 09:14 PM
You do know the BNP's leader is racist don't you? According to his own words and actions.

http://images.mirror.co.uk/upl/m4/jun2009/5/3/nick-griffin-image-1-896348983.jpg

geezer661
05-04-2010, 09:18 PM
You do know the BNP's leader is racist don't you? According to his own words and actions.

http://images.mirror.co.uk/upl/m4/jun2009/5/3/nick-griffin-image-1-896348983.jpg


why because he believes in a indigenous ppl of britain? or because hes proud of being white

amaralsright
05-04-2010, 09:21 PM
You do know the BNP's leader is racist don't you? According to his own words and actions.

http://images.mirror.co.uk/upl/m4/jun2009/5/3/nick-griffin-image-1-896348983.jpg

I raise you this...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/fivelivebreakfast/blackpowersalute.jpg

...which predates Griffin, but Griffin is obviously the bad guy.

Only white people are racist.

oioioi
05-04-2010, 09:23 PM
I raise you this...

http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/fivelivebreakfast/blackpowersalute.jpg

...which predates Griffin, but Griffin is obviously the bad guy.

Only white people are racist.

I'm not defending either one.

amaralsright
05-04-2010, 09:26 PM
I'm not defending either one.

But you chose to show us Griffin.

oioioi
05-04-2010, 09:28 PM
But you chose to show us Griffin.

We were discussing the party he leads.

geezer661
05-04-2010, 09:28 PM
But you chose to show us Griffin.


He always shows us the white man

amaralsright
05-04-2010, 09:29 PM
We were discussing the party he leads.

But his tee-shirt has history.

Did you ever hear of irony?

oioioi
05-04-2010, 09:33 PM
Did you ever hear of irony?

Is that how to get the creases out of a White Power t-shirty?

Are the Black Panthers standing in the UK elections or mentioned in this thread?

amaralsright
05-04-2010, 09:37 PM
http://willnevergiveup.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/black-power.jpg

Only white people are racist.

oioioi
05-04-2010, 09:38 PM
http://willnevergiveup.files.wordpress.com/2008/08/black-power.jpg

Only white people are racist.

Who has said that on this thread (apart from you)?

amaralsright
05-04-2010, 09:39 PM
http://2.bp.blogspot.com/_2n0Kegy5p_U/RyvUbD0QMHI/AAAAAAAAAaQ/kwf6OqcXTvQ/s320/Al%2BBell-JJax%2Bprauls.jpg

Yep.. those damn white boys.

Everyone knows only white people are racist.

oioioi
05-04-2010, 09:41 PM
Who has said that on this thread (apart from you)?

:confused:

geezer661
05-04-2010, 09:45 PM
http://www.delta4.icom43.net/images/fullsize/spot_the_racist.jpg

oioioi
05-04-2010, 09:51 PM
And again, who has said only white people can be racist?

amaralsright
06-04-2010, 09:15 AM
The only people I see being attacked here are white people.

You see the thing is, it is painted as worse if a white person speaks of white pride than if a black person does.

Why is that?

Are black people wrong to be proud of being black?

oioioi
06-04-2010, 10:27 AM
The only people I see being attacked here are white people.

You see the thing is, it is painted as worse if a white person speaks of white pride than if a black person does.

Why is that?

Are black people wrong to be proud of being black?

It's a thread about the BNP, you know, the party lead by a guy who believes in White Power. Feel free to start a thread about black racism.

amaralsright
06-04-2010, 10:58 AM
It's a thread about the BNP, you know, the party lead by a guy who believes in White Power. Feel free to start a thread about black racism.

"White power" came from "black power".

As I pointed out.

But you chose not to get it.

You can't put stuff about Nick Griffin wearing "White Power" tee-shirts and leave it at that as if that explains everything.

That's called be economical with the truth.

oioioi
06-04-2010, 11:02 AM
"White power" came from "black power".

As I pointed out.

But you chose not to get it.

You can't put stuff about Nick Griffin wearing "White Power" tee-shirts and leave it at that as if that explains everything.

That's called be economical with the truth.

I got it. I didn't get it's relevance to this thread.

griffinman
06-04-2010, 12:20 PM
I got it. I didn't get it's relevance to this thread.

I got it. I didn't get it's relevance to this thread.

mental gymnastics again oioioi..
tut..tut..
You get it you just can't argue against it.
er without become an apologist.

amaralsright 1 oioioi 0
:cool:

oioioi
06-04-2010, 12:28 PM
mental gymnastics again oioioi..
tut..tut..
You get it you just can't argue against it.
er without become an apologist.

amaralsright 1 oioioi 0
:cool:

I can't argue against it, I'm questioning it's relevance to this thread. Repeating myself because of evasive (or lack of)answers is 'mental gymnastics' to you?
:rolleyes:

nirvana
06-04-2010, 12:29 PM
Is it any wonder the UAF are sponsored by the state. When the uaf were called anti-nazi league few years back they used to try and attack david icke aswel.

The Anti-nazi league would try and form barracades round david ickes talks shouting nazi scum off our streets. David just smiled at them:D

Try mentioning that 9-11 was an inside job or alimentarious and they will verbally defend the government.

There are a few on the left that are waking up and seeing the bigger picture so things could be on the change next couple of years;)

oioioi
06-04-2010, 12:30 PM
Is it any wonder the UAF are sponsored by the state. When the uaf were called anti-nazi league few years back they used to try and attack david icke aswel.

The Anti-nazi league would try and form barracades round david ickes talks shouting nazi scum off our streets. David just smiled at them:D

Try mentioning that 9-11 was an inside job or alimentarious and they will verbally defend the government.

There are a few on the left that are waking up and seeing the bigger picture so things could be on the change next couple of years;)

So it's predominantley 'the right' that challenge 9/11?

Tee-hee.

nirvana
06-04-2010, 12:32 PM
At least they're showing up vile racists like the BNP and EDL for what they are :)

True the bnp leadership are vile but so is the UAF .The UAF are more dangerous as they have financial support from the government.

The uaf are the brown shirts of the labour party.

Why is the far left seen more acceptable than the far right?

Both are a distraction from the bigger picture.

griffinman
06-04-2010, 12:37 PM
I can't argue against it, I'm questioning it's relevance to this thread. Repeating myself because of evasive (or lack of)answers is 'mental gymnastics' to you?
:rolleyes:

Fair enough, go for the avoidance stance then.

taylor84
06-04-2010, 12:38 PM
A line needs to be drawn when it comes to free speech.

Griffin and his ilk are nothing but racial-hatred inciters.

You are a hypocrite, i suppose you are just another anti white, you hate white people wherever they are, in South Africa, you slag off ET as though whites shouldnt be their, its not their homeland, yet in Britain, which is the natives are white, you slag them off too, your just an anti white scumbag and a tool for the NWO.

nirvana
06-04-2010, 12:38 PM
A line needs to be drawn when it comes to free speech.

Griffin and his ilk are nothing but racial-hatred inciters.

Who decides where this line is?

Islamic fundamentals dont suffer any kind of protest from the far left except anachists.

New labour are bombing Iraq and Afghanistan that is more extream than the bnp.

And MP'S from this extream New labour party go to UAF meetings and talk at Anti-war coalition meetings:rolleyes:

Ever get a feeling you been lied to.

Also its possible to be anti fascist anti communist at the same time;)

oioioi
06-04-2010, 12:40 PM
Also its possible to be anti fascist anti communist at the same time;)

Hurrah!

Finally...

oioioi
06-04-2010, 12:41 PM
Fair enough, go for the avoidance stance then.

What has been 'avoided'?

nirvana
06-04-2010, 12:45 PM
So it's predominantley 'the right' that challenge 9/11?

Tee-hee.


No alot of the right will defend the government as well . The bnp will defend the government official 9-11 story.

:)

newworldengineer
06-04-2010, 12:49 PM
"White power" came from "black power".

As I pointed out.

But you chose not to get it.

You can't put stuff about Nick Griffin wearing "White Power" tee-shirts and leave it at that as if that explains everything.

That's called be economical with the truth.

Did it fuck haha! "black power" came about cos "white power" decided to impose itself on a black nation, snatched em up and enslaved them to build the transportation infrastructure for America. Cos oooh no it wasn't "white power" idiots dressed up as ghosts chasing black people out of town once the government abolished slavery was it?! But I would go as far as to say that there has always been "tribal surpremacy" groups from any race nation, which I'm sure played it's part at that level of consciousness along the evolutionary timeline... but now it's just a sign that to feel whole as an individual you have to grasp onto your race, identifying yourself with a bunch of other unevolved throwbacks purely because you look like eachother (ignore the fact that some of em might be psycho/sociopaths) on a direct route to self-destruction.

Obsessed with your image, not the wisdom behind it tsk-tsk....

geezer661
06-04-2010, 01:53 PM
Did it fuck haha! "black power" came about cos "white power" decided to impose itself on a black nation, snatched em up and enslaved them to build the transportation infrastructure for America. Cos oooh no it wasn't "white power" idiots dressed up as ghosts chasing black people out of town once the government abolished slavery was it?! But I would go as far as to say that there has always been "tribal surpremacy" groups from any race nation, which I'm sure played it's part at that level of consciousness along the evolutionary timeline... but now it's just a sign that to feel whole as an individual you have to grasp onto your race, identifying yourself with a bunch of other unevolved throwbacks purely because you look like eachother (ignore the fact that some of em might be psycho/sociopaths) on a direct route to self-destruction.

Obsessed with your image, not the wisdom behind it tsk-tsk....

American infrastructure was built by the Chinese. The slaves worked the fields

newworldengineer
06-04-2010, 03:08 PM
American infrastructure was built by the Chinese. The slaves worked the fields

What about the railroads then?

geezer661
06-04-2010, 03:34 PM
What about the railroads then?


well in the movies its all white american rail road workers but it was actually the chinese tht built them and many died in the process.

p.s.

rail roads are part of infrastructure

geezer661
06-04-2010, 03:36 PM
Fair enough, go for the avoidance stance then.


http://thereaganwing.files.wordpress.com/2007/11/head-in-sand.jpg

newworldengineer
06-04-2010, 03:48 PM
well in the movies its all white american rail road workers but it was actually the chinese tht built them and many died in the process.

p.s.

rail roads are part of infrastructure

Well that's something new for me to check out, wasn't familiar with that.