PDA

View Full Version : An American view of 9/11...


venomous
11-03-2010, 02:14 AM
For the sake of disclosure, I am an American. This is what I think.

1.) al-Qaeda is a front for the CIA.
2.) George Herbert Walker Bush is a close friend of the bin Laden family. Just as he was a family friend of the Hinkleys. As you know, Hinkley's son went on to shoot president Reagan. From then on, Bush became President de jure.
3.) The only CIVILIAN casualities on 9/11 were the folks who died in the towers. The people on the flights were all CIA spooks, including the hijackers who were trained at American military bases.
4.) The planes that hit the towers were unmanned, remote controlled.
5.) Building 7 was demolished.
6.) Either a predator drone or a cruise missile hit the pentagon.

Those are six points that I would like to make. I'll add more points as they come to me.

stannrodd
11-03-2010, 02:39 AM
For the sake of disclosure, I am an American. This is what I think.

1.) al-Qaeda is a front for the CIA.
2.) George Herbert Walker Bush is a close friend of the bin Laden family. Just as he was a family friend of the Hinkleys. As you know, Hinkley's son went on to shoot president Reagan. From then on, Bush became President de jure.
3.) The only CIVILIAN casualities on 9/11 were the folks who died in the towers. The people on the flights were all CIA spooks, including the hijackers who were trained at American military bases.
4.) The planes that hit the towers were unmanned, remote controlled.
5.) Building 7 was demolished.
6.) Either a predator drone or a cruise missile hit the pentagon.

Those are six points that I would like to make. I'll add more points as they come to me.

Points 3 & 4 are contradictory. You can't have unmanned flights with people on them. But I tend to agree with you mostly.

Stann

venomous
11-03-2010, 03:04 AM
Points 3 & 4 are contradictory. You can't have unmanned flights with people on them. But I tend to agree with you mostly.

Stann

I meant to say, the only casualities were in the buildings hit. The people "supposedly" on the planes weren't actually on the planes. I think they were CIA spooks. The planes were diverted elsewhere while unmanned, remote controlled planes hit the towers.

stannrodd
11-03-2010, 04:35 AM
I meant to say, the only casualities were in the buildings hit. The people "supposedly" on the planes weren't actually on the planes. I think they were CIA spooks. The planes were diverted elsewhere while unmanned, remote controlled planes hit the towers.

Totally agree .. your post maybe a bit ambiguous I guess.

see my post at #666 in this thread

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=59133&page=67

The "passengers" could also have been innocents such that real victims were created.

Stann :confused:

camreeno
11-03-2010, 09:28 AM
I think you're a little bit late to the party. This is very basic information that I'm sure at least 2/3rds of the forum here are familiar with.

(BY THE WAY my post count is at exactly 1111 LOOK!!!! Hurry!!!)