View Full Version : Verbal techniques used in BBC brainwashing
baron von lotsov
29-09-2007, 05:41 AM
Listen to the news very carefully. Very carefully indeed. Try and use your head to sample bits of audio from a BBC newsreader and take a word and analyse it precisely. Look at the way the subtle intonations are used according to the word and look at how this modifies the meaning of it. For example the word 'government', see how this is vocalised according to the context it is used. Try other words and do the same. What you will find is a sophisticated language superimposed on the words being vocalised. It's complex; the intonations are like a separate vocabulary.
I did this the other day. I took a simple line "the protesters were chanting anti-government slogans" The word government was not vocalised directly but contained a more precise and a multitude of descriptors in just that one word. It was spoken too fast for the mind to take it all in consciously as in the purpose of it to program the subconscious in a subliminal way.
This is why you need to memorise bits using your audio memory. The human mind can do this, it can sample an audio piece of a second or two and memorise the exact sound, the more you practice this the better you will find you become at it. This is how to detect subliminals. One word 'slogans' was, for example, pronounced slow - guns. How very devious. Also try and see what these subliminals are communicating, e.g. one I seem to see used a lot is to portray the government as a well meaning person of good intention who is being unjustly criticized and an expression of the actual government as personified being victimised. Victim consciousness is a biggy, look at it and tell me what you discover.
Also another way to detect this is when you ignore the words altogether and try and make sense of what is being communicated just by the intonations. My next-door neighbour sometimes has his TV on and I can just about hear it through the wall. The wall acts as a low pass filter. Most intelligible speech is in the audio range of about 800hz to about 3khz, as in the audio you get on a telephone line. The wall filters out much of this band and what you are left with is the subliminal imprint on the audio, the emotional content, the hypnotic timing as well. I'll tell you what; if you heard it this way you would never switch on a TV in the rest of your life. What I found was not just occasional, it was completely like this, be it a soap, the news, a documentary or whatever. The documentary was the worst of the lot. Seriously, you people want to check this out.
Anders Lindman
29-09-2007, 06:25 AM
Interesting. At BBC they are probably taught how to use the 'voice' like some people in the book 'Dune'.
Here is an example of the BBC 'voice' without the subliminal sugarcoating:
Scientology: BBC reporter losing it! - YouTube
baron von lotsov
29-09-2007, 06:46 AM
It's not just the BBC either but the BBC are the pros. News is a traditional one and they do train them. This training is the kind of work the Tavistock people are involved with. One of their subsidiaries, Stanford University, has a department that is responsible for nearly every ATM voice message used in corporations throughout the world; such is the power of the Institute.
horus21
29-09-2007, 06:50 AM
Oh yeah, you bet they do.
You should hear the Australian media pronounce the word Muslim, its outrageous on another level.
Feel like flying kicking through the box, knocking the sod off the chair and taking over.
synak
29-09-2007, 06:51 AM
Yeah I've been realizing this happens frequently in most if not all major news networks. Though thankfully I no longer watch television because I feel as if my mind is being scrambled just by listening/watching it. Instead I simply stick to films.
Has anyone ever noticed the hand gestures that are made by politicians during debates and speeches? Subliminal suggestion to the fullest there as well.
Anders Lindman
29-09-2007, 06:53 AM
Another thing related to this is that mainstream media uses a LOT of fear in their reporting. One reason for this would be to 'freeze' the subconscious minds of the audience and so prepare them and make them susceptible to subliminal imprinting. The mind is like water. If you write something in water the message quickly dissolves UNLESS you can keep the mind in a frozen state; for then the message can be carved in like into a block of ice.
horus21
29-09-2007, 06:57 AM
Yeah I've been realizing this happens frequently in most if not all major news networks. Though thankfully I no longer watch television because I feel as if my mind is being scrambled just by listening/watching it. Instead I simply stick to films.
Has anyone ever noticed the hand gestures that are made by politicians during debates and speeches? Subliminal suggestion to the fullest there as well.
They would lose their job doing anything else... and the amount they would be receiving for that kind of deceit off the books would most obviously be phenomenal ... But imagine how dirty they would feel on their honest personal reflective level... Like a scummy infectious disease swarming through their core.
No wonder journalists are generally regarded as scummy wastes of sperm.
Anders Lindman
29-09-2007, 07:18 AM
When it comes to television, in Sweden we have to pay a license for owning a television set. Many people ignore paying the license. The main reason for the license could be a clever trick for enhancing subliminal programming. The viewer who has not payed his or her TV license is constantly in a state of state of guilt/fear because of that, at least on a subconscious level. This creates a subtle and hidden but very effective state of mind in the audience for subliminal imprinting.
horus21
29-09-2007, 07:35 AM
When it comes to television, in Sweden we have to pay a license for owning a television set. Many people ignore paying the license. The main reason for the license could be a clever trick for enhancing subliminal programming. The viewer who has not payed his or her TV license is constantly in a state of state of guilt/fear because of that, at least on a subconscious level. This creates a subtle and hidden but very effective state of mind in the audience for subliminal imprinting.
wow
what a policy...
28th kingdom
29-09-2007, 09:09 AM
Brainwashing is sexy time.
neutron flux
29-09-2007, 12:04 PM
Listen to the news very carefully. Very carefully indeed. Try and use your head to sample bits of audio from a BBC newsreader and take a word and analyse it precisely. Look at the way the subtle intonations are used according to the word and look at how this modifies the meaning of it. For example the word 'government', see how this is vocalised according to the context it is used. Try other words and do the same. What you will find is a sophisticated language superimposed on the words being vocalised. It's complex; the intonations are like a separate vocabulary.
I did this the other day. I took a simple line "the protesters were chanting anti-government slogans" The word government was not vocalised directly but contained a more precise and a multitude of descriptors in just that one word. It was spoken too fast for the mind to take it all in consciously as in the purpose of it to program the subconscious in a subliminal way.
This is why you need to memorise bits using your audio memory. The human mind can do this, it can sample an audio piece of a second or two and memorise the exact sound, the more you practice this the better you will find you become at it. This is how to detect subliminals. One word 'slogans' was, for example, pronounced slow - guns. How very devious. Also try and see what these subliminals are communicating, e.g. one I seem to see used a lot is to portray the government as a well meaning person of good intention who is being unjustly criticized and an expression of the actual government as personified being victimised. Victim consciousness is a biggy, look at it and tell me what you discover.
Also another way to detect this is when you ignore the words altogether and try and make sense of what is being communicated just by the intonations. My next-door neighbour sometimes has his TV on and I can just about hear it through the wall. The wall acts as a low pass filter. Most intelligible speech is in the audio range of about 800hz to about 3khz, as in the audio you get on a telephone line. The wall filters out much of this band and what you are left with is the subliminal imprint on the audio, the emotional content, the hypnotic timing as well. I'll tell you what; if you heard it this way you would never switch on a TV in the rest of your life. What I found was not just occasional, it was completely like this, be it a soap, the news, a documentary or whatever. The documentary was the worst of the lot. Seriously, you people want to check this out.
Did you notice this whilst stoned Baron? Because it just sounds like rambling crap with the idiot news readers in on the "plot", with slogans pronounced slow-guns etc :rolleyes:
They don't need to do any subliminals or sophisticated language patterns - most people will see the news reader as an authority figure anyway and swallow what they say without question.
Anders Lindman
29-09-2007, 12:58 PM
They don't need to do any subliminals or sophisticated language patterns - most people will see the news reader as an authority figure anyway and swallow what they say without question.
:eek: :eek: :eek: That's an excellent point! I surely have learned to be highly skeptical about all TV presenters. But only say two years ago I was not at all that skeptical and basically swallowed every mainstream news story (and other information presented by big television stations) hook line and sinker. Maintaining the appearance of TV presenters as presenters of authoritative information must be very crucial to the elite.
matrixcutter
29-09-2007, 03:58 PM
Listen to the news very carefully. Very carefully indeed. Try and use your head to sample bits of audio from a BBC newsreader and take a word and analyse it precisely. Look at the way the subtle intonations are used according to the word and look at how this modifies the meaning of it. For example the word 'government', see how this is vocalised according to the context it is used. Try other words and do the same. What you will find is a sophisticated language superimposed on the words being vocalised. It's complex; the intonations are like a separate vocabulary.
I did this the other day. I took a simple line "the protesters were chanting anti-government slogans" The word government was not vocalised directly but contained a more precise and a multitude of descriptors in just that one word. It was spoken too fast for the mind to take it all in consciously as in the purpose of it to program the subconscious in a subliminal way.
This is why you need to memorise bits using your audio memory. The human mind can do this, it can sample an audio piece of a second or two and memorise the exact sound, the more you practice this the better you will find you become at it. This is how to detect subliminals. One word 'slogans' was, for example, pronounced slow - guns. How very devious. Also try and see what these subliminals are communicating, e.g. one I seem to see used a lot is to portray the government as a well meaning person of good intention who is being unjustly criticized and an expression of the actual government as personified being victimised. Victim consciousness is a biggy, look at it and tell me what you discover.
Also another way to detect this is when you ignore the words altogether and try and make sense of what is being communicated just by the intonations. My next-door neighbour sometimes has his TV on and I can just about hear it through the wall. The wall acts as a low pass filter. Most intelligible speech is in the audio range of about 800hz to about 3khz, as in the audio you get on a telephone line. The wall filters out much of this band and what you are left with is the subliminal imprint on the audio, the emotional content, the hypnotic timing as well. I'll tell you what; if you heard it this way you would never switch on a TV in the rest of your life. What I found was not just occasional, it was completely like this, be it a soap, the news, a documentary or whatever. The documentary was the worst of the lot. Seriously, you people want to check this out.
Do you have any more examples of this?
joss classey
29-09-2007, 04:03 PM
Feel the TV as it lures you in. Its omniscient presence and formidable glow.
The gentle hum of the smooth synthetic chassis.
Calming to the conscious.
Piercing screams like needles shooting through the tampered drum in your ear.
Gently it lulls you into a trance-like state in which all that is around you is blocked from sight and sense.
Alone or with company its hold on you strong,
Red, green and blue parade in the confided space to which makes pictures of that it is ignorantly unaware.
The occasional fizz or digital fracture,
Moves and jumps, intense as it thrives.
Familiar sounds vibrate their way around the room
Seeking ready minds
To turn and glance, transfixed
The thin charm of those blinding flickering colours
Are empty and moodless, repeating
Forgetting the night before
And yet returning
And waking…
To waste.
baron von lotsov
30-09-2007, 05:49 AM
Yeah I've been realizing this happens frequently in most if not all major news networks. Though thankfully I no longer watch television because I feel as if my mind is being scrambled just by listening/watching it. Instead I simply stick to films.
Has anyone ever noticed the hand gestures that are made by politicians during debates and speeches? Subliminal suggestion to the fullest there as well.
Do you notice the prolific use of stroboscopic techniques in films? All that thunder and lightening and/or spaceage warfare or whatever. Indeed any excuse to use strobe effects to hypnotise you. However that is something different, I want to focus on subliminal effects used in speech because I think this is one of the least known about and one that does more to brainwash you than you might think.
If anyone else has noticed this please give some examples and if you haven't just try finding out for yourself. Don't rely on mainstream conspiracy sites to spoon-feed you because I have very rarely ever seen any of them mention this. Hidden in plain view as per usual. While they distract you on what Bush is doing the brainwashers get to work entirely without hindrance, indeed distraction is part of their business plan.
whitenight639
30-09-2007, 06:13 AM
Im sorry baron i was looking for examples for you, the newsreaders are picked for how they enphersize certain words and the girl news reader on radio 1 is very good at it. i will post an example in a min, but what you said about walls is very interesting!
BBC News 24 error, interview job applicant (not taxi driver) - YouTube
whitenight639
30-09-2007, 06:19 AM
found a perfect example forget there lies and bullshit content and you can see the psychology of how they pronounce certain words. This only really applies to the first few seconds.
FOX ATTACKS: Iran - YouTube
baron von lotsov
05-10-2007, 02:15 PM
found a perfect example forget there lies and bullshit content and you can see the psychology of how they pronounce certain words. This only really applies to the first few seconds.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1-eyuFBrWHs
Well you ask me for examples but I hear it everytime I see a television. I don't watch it unless I'm forced to, like going around to see someone who decides they want to watch the box.
Like I was saying the documentaries seem to be some of the worst. Check the haunting music they are accompanied to. One of some natural disaster shit, the subtext being of course more global warming paranoia. They can use virtually any theme to programme in the subliminals. Even our own National Trust has a big sign locally saying 'keep to the path'!