vladmir
27-02-2010, 06:44 AM
Source:
http://spiritualeconomicsnow.net/?p=33
In one of my snits of frustration, recently, I packed it all in (as I do episodically) and read Gregg Braden’s book, The Spontaneous Healing of Belief – Shattering the Paradigm of False Limits. He reminded me of what I have known for decades – that we can create… in fact, that’s all we can do. We don’t do anything but create. We create every aspect of our life experience. If we really knew who we are, we would not be dabbling in any of this commercial investigation, particularly, because every bit of energy we hand over to those who seem to be running the planet only strengthens them. What we want to do is turn away from them and look to ourselves. Why fight someone else’s creation when we have our own creating to do? We’ve already created them as they are; now, we must create something that will override that. As long as we are giving them our time, attention, energy, and emotion (which is what keeps them alive), those whom we most want to convince that we know who we are know that we do NOT know who we are by the very fact that we are involved with them and their silly ‘policy manuals’. Dealing with agents, at their level, proves that we believe that the illusion of their authority is real and, ergo, the reality of ours is not. We ought to have nothing to do with them, other than to be sure they keep their word, honor their oaths, and do their jobs. Servants must always be monitored, lest they overstep their position.
If we knew who we are, we would have nothing to do with them. This includes their ‘medicine’, their ’schools’, their ‘law’, their ‘churches’, their ‘media’, etc. – ALL designed to keep us from knowing who we truly are. Somehow, they know this; hence, every time we converse with them, frequent their places of ‘worship’, argue over ‘payment’, read their ‘newspapers’, go to their ‘courts’, follow or resist their “orders”, attend their ‘classes’, visit their ‘doctors’, etc., they know that we do not know who we are and they treat us accordingly. If we knew who we were, we would be minding our own health, educating ourselves, conducting our own spiritual development, and not deferring to them for anything.
I simply cannot even imagine the enlightened beings of this planet poring over law books, writing paper, learning what to say in court, filing documents, attending seminars, paying for the latest process, etc. in order to get out of a situation which they know, in their hearts, simply does not involve them. They know who they are. I have concluded that, as long as we are still investigating any aspect of the commerce game, those who control it have us where they want us – IN the game, which they control, by THEIR rules, which apply only to them. I suspect that the less we know about their game, the better off we are. That is their business, not ours – and simply becoming very clear on who we are and acting accordingly is what will get us out of this ludicrous mess. I feel as if I have arrived, which is why I am writing this… now.
I could always sense what was wrong when I heard the latest and greatest information because it was complicated and the documents involved were egregiously long and legal. I always said, “If it isn’t simple, it isn’t accurate. If most people cannot grasp the concept, then it isn’t accurate. If it involves knowing the policies of the Psychopathocracy, then it isn’t accurate.” Consequently, I knew that I would know the truth when it showed up because it would be simple – something that we could all see and grasp (if we truly remembered who we are) and it would have nothing to do with any corporate policy manual.
So, whilst reading Braden’s book, the penny dropped… I remembered who I am. I clearly saw all I need to know about how to handle the public. There is a Trust, evidenced by the NAME; my parents were the Grantors of the value, the Province of Ontario registered it, so it is the Owner and Trustee, all public servants are Agents for the Trustee, and, the Trust/NAME itself is the Beneficiary-in-fact. The entire game of Commerce is played for the beneficiaries. Needless to say, the public isn’t about to create a game which doesn’t benefit them, so, ‘beneficiaries’ includes them. My parents granted the original value to the NAME/Trust, via their signatures, and, over the years, I gave it value, via my labor. I cannot be involved in commerce so I use the NAME/Trust in order for me to function in a society which is based upon commerce. Think ‘Monopoly®™’ We require a token to play, and the only money is that within the game. There is no ‘money’ outside the game.
I guess it is human nature to try to get out of doing one’s job, yet, since I stand to lose, it would behoove me to ensure that the servants serve not only themselves but also me. I hold all public Trust corporations in trust, and, if an agent becomes ‘un-trust-worthy’, e.g.: if he neglects his fiduciary duty and pretends that I am the Trustee – the one responsible for settling and adjusting the Trust’s accounts – then, I am obliged to remind him of his oath of office, wherein he has sworn ‘to serve and protect’ me and my rights. It is the trust owner, trustee, and agents who have a job to do – not I. Since their debts are their business, not mine, and, since the one who creates the liability must provide the remedy, they are the ones required to settle all charges against the Trust. If they refuse, then they are in violation of public policy and the criminal code and I would be obliged to lay claim against them for Breach of the public Trust and Breach of Oath of Office.
Will we soon lay claims against doctors for Breach of their Hippocratic Oath wherein they swear: “I will… never do harm to anyone”? Taking down some of the medical mafia might move ‘medicine’ out of its present position of the #1 cause of death on this continent.
Maybe we ought just to say that we do not choose to be recognized through the Name and, unless they can prove that we are required to be or that we are a Trust or a Name, why are they trying to get us to pay a debt that belongs to the public, particularly when we cannot ‘pay’? There is no money, and we are not even permitted to play the game, let alone incur debt. The charge is against the Trust; who is the Trustee? We are not, so, who is the one required to settle the account? They have the wrong party. We wish we could settle it for them yet we do not have access to the account; we cannot take from it; we can only give value to it. Haven’t we done that, already? How could they have set up, for example, a credit card, if we didn’t give them the value up front? Now that they have created debt for that account, aren’t they the ones liable for the remedy, for setting off the debt, for balancing the account? This has nothing to do with us.
Whoever created the debt is the one responsible for settling it, yet, they will do everything to try to make us liable. But why would any of us willingly go to court? A place where we were not invited, where we have no standing, where our chances of prevailing are almost nil, where we are not being compensated for our time or effort for a charge which has nothing to do with us, and for which the agent for the Trustee is not only already in the court but also the one legally obliged to settle the account for the Trust/Name? I heard that one judge, upon hearing a fellow lament that he is not the Name, ask, “Well, if you’re not the Name, why are you here?”
Why have we been doing the servants’ work for them? Because they tricked us into believing that we are responsible for balancing the books of the Trust (the name of which we have continuously been told is our ‘name’ and is not), for which we are NOT Trustee, and we forgot to question this, all because… we had yet to remember who we are.
Continued here:
http://spiritualeconomicsnow.net/?p=33
http://spiritualeconomicsnow.net/?p=33
In one of my snits of frustration, recently, I packed it all in (as I do episodically) and read Gregg Braden’s book, The Spontaneous Healing of Belief – Shattering the Paradigm of False Limits. He reminded me of what I have known for decades – that we can create… in fact, that’s all we can do. We don’t do anything but create. We create every aspect of our life experience. If we really knew who we are, we would not be dabbling in any of this commercial investigation, particularly, because every bit of energy we hand over to those who seem to be running the planet only strengthens them. What we want to do is turn away from them and look to ourselves. Why fight someone else’s creation when we have our own creating to do? We’ve already created them as they are; now, we must create something that will override that. As long as we are giving them our time, attention, energy, and emotion (which is what keeps them alive), those whom we most want to convince that we know who we are know that we do NOT know who we are by the very fact that we are involved with them and their silly ‘policy manuals’. Dealing with agents, at their level, proves that we believe that the illusion of their authority is real and, ergo, the reality of ours is not. We ought to have nothing to do with them, other than to be sure they keep their word, honor their oaths, and do their jobs. Servants must always be monitored, lest they overstep their position.
If we knew who we are, we would have nothing to do with them. This includes their ‘medicine’, their ’schools’, their ‘law’, their ‘churches’, their ‘media’, etc. – ALL designed to keep us from knowing who we truly are. Somehow, they know this; hence, every time we converse with them, frequent their places of ‘worship’, argue over ‘payment’, read their ‘newspapers’, go to their ‘courts’, follow or resist their “orders”, attend their ‘classes’, visit their ‘doctors’, etc., they know that we do not know who we are and they treat us accordingly. If we knew who we were, we would be minding our own health, educating ourselves, conducting our own spiritual development, and not deferring to them for anything.
I simply cannot even imagine the enlightened beings of this planet poring over law books, writing paper, learning what to say in court, filing documents, attending seminars, paying for the latest process, etc. in order to get out of a situation which they know, in their hearts, simply does not involve them. They know who they are. I have concluded that, as long as we are still investigating any aspect of the commerce game, those who control it have us where they want us – IN the game, which they control, by THEIR rules, which apply only to them. I suspect that the less we know about their game, the better off we are. That is their business, not ours – and simply becoming very clear on who we are and acting accordingly is what will get us out of this ludicrous mess. I feel as if I have arrived, which is why I am writing this… now.
I could always sense what was wrong when I heard the latest and greatest information because it was complicated and the documents involved were egregiously long and legal. I always said, “If it isn’t simple, it isn’t accurate. If most people cannot grasp the concept, then it isn’t accurate. If it involves knowing the policies of the Psychopathocracy, then it isn’t accurate.” Consequently, I knew that I would know the truth when it showed up because it would be simple – something that we could all see and grasp (if we truly remembered who we are) and it would have nothing to do with any corporate policy manual.
So, whilst reading Braden’s book, the penny dropped… I remembered who I am. I clearly saw all I need to know about how to handle the public. There is a Trust, evidenced by the NAME; my parents were the Grantors of the value, the Province of Ontario registered it, so it is the Owner and Trustee, all public servants are Agents for the Trustee, and, the Trust/NAME itself is the Beneficiary-in-fact. The entire game of Commerce is played for the beneficiaries. Needless to say, the public isn’t about to create a game which doesn’t benefit them, so, ‘beneficiaries’ includes them. My parents granted the original value to the NAME/Trust, via their signatures, and, over the years, I gave it value, via my labor. I cannot be involved in commerce so I use the NAME/Trust in order for me to function in a society which is based upon commerce. Think ‘Monopoly®™’ We require a token to play, and the only money is that within the game. There is no ‘money’ outside the game.
I guess it is human nature to try to get out of doing one’s job, yet, since I stand to lose, it would behoove me to ensure that the servants serve not only themselves but also me. I hold all public Trust corporations in trust, and, if an agent becomes ‘un-trust-worthy’, e.g.: if he neglects his fiduciary duty and pretends that I am the Trustee – the one responsible for settling and adjusting the Trust’s accounts – then, I am obliged to remind him of his oath of office, wherein he has sworn ‘to serve and protect’ me and my rights. It is the trust owner, trustee, and agents who have a job to do – not I. Since their debts are their business, not mine, and, since the one who creates the liability must provide the remedy, they are the ones required to settle all charges against the Trust. If they refuse, then they are in violation of public policy and the criminal code and I would be obliged to lay claim against them for Breach of the public Trust and Breach of Oath of Office.
Will we soon lay claims against doctors for Breach of their Hippocratic Oath wherein they swear: “I will… never do harm to anyone”? Taking down some of the medical mafia might move ‘medicine’ out of its present position of the #1 cause of death on this continent.
Maybe we ought just to say that we do not choose to be recognized through the Name and, unless they can prove that we are required to be or that we are a Trust or a Name, why are they trying to get us to pay a debt that belongs to the public, particularly when we cannot ‘pay’? There is no money, and we are not even permitted to play the game, let alone incur debt. The charge is against the Trust; who is the Trustee? We are not, so, who is the one required to settle the account? They have the wrong party. We wish we could settle it for them yet we do not have access to the account; we cannot take from it; we can only give value to it. Haven’t we done that, already? How could they have set up, for example, a credit card, if we didn’t give them the value up front? Now that they have created debt for that account, aren’t they the ones liable for the remedy, for setting off the debt, for balancing the account? This has nothing to do with us.
Whoever created the debt is the one responsible for settling it, yet, they will do everything to try to make us liable. But why would any of us willingly go to court? A place where we were not invited, where we have no standing, where our chances of prevailing are almost nil, where we are not being compensated for our time or effort for a charge which has nothing to do with us, and for which the agent for the Trustee is not only already in the court but also the one legally obliged to settle the account for the Trust/Name? I heard that one judge, upon hearing a fellow lament that he is not the Name, ask, “Well, if you’re not the Name, why are you here?”
Why have we been doing the servants’ work for them? Because they tricked us into believing that we are responsible for balancing the books of the Trust (the name of which we have continuously been told is our ‘name’ and is not), for which we are NOT Trustee, and we forgot to question this, all because… we had yet to remember who we are.
Continued here:
http://spiritualeconomicsnow.net/?p=33