Woman who cried rape after sex in public toilet wa

[mr fiddler]

A 21-year-old woman who made a false accusation of rape in a bid to claim thousands of pounds in compensation escaped a jail term today.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1251201/Young-woman-cried-rape-sex-public-toilet-escapes-jail.html#ixzz0fcftJL5T


http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/9171/article1251201084d37500.jpg


My god, what a two penny little scrubber, if she were cattle on my farm we'd call her "The Dead Eye" although she does have a healthy pair of udders

[killuminatiday]

throw her in a room with hadabusa and turn on the barry white, that will teach her to cry wolf:D

[oioioi]

I heard the guy was dressed like a rapist though, so he brought it on himself.

[codie]

throw her in a room with hadabusa and turn on the barry white, that will teach her to cry wolf:D

:eek: :D

[skyfish]

I heard the guy was dressed like a rapist though, so he brought it on himself.


Brilliant!! :D

[mv8800]

I heard the guy was dressed like a rapist though, so he brought it on himself.

Bwahahahahaha. Spat my beer out.

[dude111]

What a fucking hoar!!

'The last 11 months have been horrendous. I've lost all my self-confidence and I can't speak to women any more. I don't know why she did it but her lies have ruined my life'I feel bad for the guy......

[redman]

What a dirty little skank. Women who do this should get the same sentence as the person would of got if they did rape them.


Simple as fooking that.

[gallifrey]

I heard the guy was dressed like a rapist though, so he brought it on himself.

Sorry, help me out a little here....what exactly does a rapist 'dress' like?? Just so I know to be on the look out.

[boy better know]

Woman like her are the main reason why the conviction % of men who do actually commit rape is so low.

The Jury in a rape case knows that the woman who is making the accusation will face no real punishment even if it is proven that they have lied about being raped in court.

Is it any wonder then, that the Jury in rape cases so rarely comes to a guilty verdict?

Boy better know the punishment for lying about being raped should be exactly the same as the punishment for rape itself. She was trying to get an innocent man what could have been a life sentence. Now she should do the life sentence instead.

[dynamicwiseman]

She told him he 'better be there for the baby' if she fell pregnant. :eek:

[oioioi]

Sorry, help me out a little here....what exactly does a rapist 'dress' like?? Just so I know to be on the look out.

:eek:

It's a joke, I refuse to explain it because it is then no longer a joke.

[bob_jones]

A simillar thing happend to me.

She cried rape to help all her bent cop friends and Tony Blair with a smear campaign.

But there was no arrest, moslty becuse they were all planning to murder me by poisoning the drinking water with carcenogenic chemicalsd and bio-warfare germs and converted my flat into a gas chamber by attaching a canbister of VX-nerve gas to the shower room vent.

So they just declared me guilty but mentaly unfit to comprehend.

This way they could follow me for years telling people I'm a rapist but tell them and bribe them not to tell me on the basis that I would not understand.

And get other "bunnies" of Animal Farm to make simillar allegations to pile me under so deep I would never have my word over her's.

I don't need to Le Caprice bar in Llanelli was packed on Christmas Carnival night 2003 and there was never any rape there.

One law for me and another law for journalists from The Daily Telegraph and not The Times after she jumped ship.

[meksar]

This is nothing new as women now have the law on there side in many legal cases, there are some really manipulative and vindictive opportunists who can get away with all sorts. Surely the man falsely accused should be within his right to give this harlot a slap across the face in a out of court settlement. Men can now be arrested if a woman gives consent but "wants to get off the ride halfway into it", these type of laws can only be abused at the end of the day. I could understand if the man becomes violent or a bit too rough for example, but like at theme parks once you get on the ride you can't get off until it finishes.

[meksar]

Not a very nice thing to say but i really do hope many of these nasty little whores run into men like this, then they will find out the true price of whoring themselves.

The Sopranos - Silvio's pimp hand is strong - YouTube

Next time there'll be no next time - YouTube

[metacomet]

What a fucking hoar!!


What a dirty little skank.

Two of the classiest Ickers right here.

[meksar]

http://www.henrymakow.com/feminism_is_racism_against_men.html

[meksar]

It was not that long ago when some smart-arse feminists was ranting this exact comment about males...

Now the tables have turned and it's about time...

"A woman falsely accused of rape can benefit from the experience."

http://whatmenthinkofwomen.blogspot.com/2007/09/woman-falsely-accused-of-rape-can.html

[hadabusa]

A 21-year-old woman who made a false accusation of rape in a bid to claim thousands of pounds in compensation escaped a jail term today.

Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1251201/Young-woman-cried-rape-sex-public-toilet-escapes-jail.html#ixzz0fcftJL5T


http://img522.imageshack.us/img522/9171/article1251201084d37500.jpg


My god, what a two penny little scrubber, if she were cattle on my farm we'd call her "The Dead Eye" although she does have a healthy pair of udders

id hit it.


she deserves2get raped,its that simple.

[meksar]

She deserves to have the book thrown at her thats for sure, if you were to pursue sexual intercourse with her you may end up finding yourself in court with a bogus rape charge. In my opinion she is harldy worth a blowjob and no im not being misogynistic or egotistical because that is literally all she is worth.

Here is another example of what men who are falsely accused of rape have to endure and are pushed to

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-541189/Man-hangs-falsely-accused-raping-women-children.html

Another Harlot at work here

http://www.metro.co.uk/news/596319-too-drunk-woman-accuses-man-of-rape

[yellowbentine]

:eek:

It's a joke, I refuse to explain it because it is then no longer a joke.

I laughed. It was a rather good joke.

[griffinman]

Woman like her are the main reason why the conviction % of men who do actually commit rape is so low.


So true... she looks and act like a right old whore....

mind you the guy accused does look like a 'little chavy rapist'
Wouldn't be surprised if he did do it..

Tough call tough call...

If I was judge I would've given him 5 years and her... 10 years.

[bob_jones]

I wander if it was Rachel's former secretary Henryetta that bribed Le Celseste Hotel in Vals Les Bains to attack me with bio-warfare terror weapons last September?

Looked a bit like her.

I've only met Henryetta once in Tom Pepper's night club in Llanelli over 6 years ago.

She didn't even introduce herself.

She was with the French man with a really big arse.

I suppose all you need is a false allegation of rape from when you worked for the Daily Telegraph to give yourself a life long licence to use germ warfare terrorism.

[searching]

i dont get it why was this little slapper let of so lightly, i mean if he couldnt prove his innocence, hed been in sum serious shit... do you know what happens to rapist in prison?
fcuked up man made laws

[rydeon]

Another example of how women have been brainwashed into trying to get what they want from the man at any cost.
Well she's been named and shamed now.
Sent to coventry should be a lingering reminder for her!

[starstuff]

she deserves2get raped,its that simple.

Screw you. Nobody deserves to be raped.

[hadabusa]

Screw you. Nobody deserves to be raped.

she does. its my opinion.

screw me, i dont care.

[wake_up_bomb]

If things played out as are reported here, then this is obviously a travesty of justice.

However, I would take anything printed in the Daily Mail with a fistful of salt. Even if this is an accurate and even-handed report - which given their previous record, eg. the infamous report of Stephen Gateley's death, is not exactly a racing certainty - the last thing that rag will have been motivated by, are the feelings and rights of the people involved. Just look at the articles all the way down the right-hand side of the page. They print that kind of shit all-day, every day. The 'paper' is a combination of vindictive Heat-esque sniping at celebrities, the worst kind of Home Counties bigotry and snobbishness, and faux-outraged moral bile, which is hugely hypocritical given the fact that they will print the most tawdry articles imaginable, just to garner a little bit of attention.

It is the gutterest of the gutter press, and I wouldn't accept a word that was written in it, unless it was verified beyond all doubt by several other sources. And even then, they are hardly in a position to occupy the moral high ground.

[bob_jones]

If things played out as are reported here, then this is obviously a travesty of justice.

However, I would take anything printed in the Daily Mail with a fistful of salt. Even if this is an accurate and even-handed report - which given their previous record, eg. the infamous report of Stephen Gateley's death, is not exactly a racing certainty - the last thing that rag will have been motivated by, are the feelings and rights of the people involved. Just look at the articles all the way down the right-hand side of the page. They print that kind of shit all-day, every day. The 'paper' is a combination of vindictive Heat-esque sniping at celebrities, the worst kind of Home Counties bigotry and snobbishness, and faux-outraged moral bile, which is hugely hypocritical given the fact that they will print the most tawdry articles imaginable, just to garner a little bit of attention.

It is the gutterest of the gutter press, and I wouldn't accept a word that was written in it, unless it was verified beyond all doubt by several other sources. And even then, they are hardly in a position to occupy the moral high ground.

Yes, I agree, but they do the odd bit of risky journalism, 9/11 was implied and inside job, and they did expose the BIG PHARMA expansion of making just about every human emotion an illness with a profitable medicince on offer of course!!

And that is with Melanie Phillips flogging psychiatric drugs on the BBC Radio 4 Moral Maze like they are going out of fasion!!!

Ref:-


Psychiatrists want to call being angry a mental illness. How utterly mad!


By Jerome Burne
Last updated at 9:53 PM on 15th February 2010





Named: People who become very angry, like Mr. T in the A Team, could have 'intermittent explosive disorder'

Do you live surrounded by clutter - ancient copies of magazines, your children’s old toys, articles you’ve clipped out of newspapers over the years?

If you find it hard to throw out things of limited or no value, you could be suffering from hoarding disorder.

‘Hoarding’ is just one of the new mental conditions being added to the psychiatrists’ bible, or the Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders (DSM), to give it its proper name.

Other new conditions identified as possibly needing professional help include binge eating - which is said to affect many people who are seriously obese - and ‘cognitive tempo disorder’, which seems very like laziness (symptoms include dreaminess and sluggishness).


There’s also ‘intermittent explosive disorder’, which involves occasionally becoming very angry suddenly.

Most bizarre of the proposed additions is one defined as ‘getting a thrill at being outraged by pornography’.


It was also described as Whitehouse syndrome after the campaigner Mary Whitehouse, who objected to sexual content on TV.

The DSM is a large book that lists all psychiatric disorders and describes their symptoms. If a condition is in there, it means it’s considered a mental illness.

But some of the new entries are controversial, not least because of fears they will result in many more people being put on drugs that could be ineffective or dangerous.

The DSM is produced by the American Psychiatric Association and is hugely influential worldwide.

‘Once a condition has got a label you’ve got a better chance of being treated and researchers are more likely to investigate it,’ explains Professor David Cottrell, professor of child and adolescent psychiatry at the University of Leeds.



But not everybody is so relaxed about including new disorders. In fact, every time the DSM gets updated there is a big row about what should be added and what shouldn’t. This time is no exception.

There have been three versions of the DSM since the first in 1952 and with each edition it has grown fatter. - DSM-IV is seven times larger than the original. Last week, a draft of DSM-V - due to be published in 2013 - was put on the web and is already proving contentious.

While hoarding is largely uncontroversial - whatever inveterate newspaper clippers might think of being labelled ‘unwell’ - the inclusion of binge-eating disorder is being hotly opposed. So, too, is the addition of internet and sex addictions.

One of the most outspoken critics is Professor Christopher Lane, author of Shyness: How Normal Behaviour Became A Sickness.


He’s worried about the blurring of the line between eccentricity and illness. ‘The American Psychiatric Association is hell-bent on medicalising the normal highs and lows of people’s emotional lives,’ he says.


‘For this latest revision they’ve set up a special task force to decide if behaviours like bitterness, extreme shopping or overuse of the internet should be included,’ he says. ‘The science underlying all this is very shaky to non-existent.’
Even shakier was the basis for the supposed disorder of being excited about condemning pornography. Its formal name, ‘absexuality’, was coined by Carol Queen, a San Francisco sex shop owner.

She used it to describe those opposed to her work and campaigned to have it included in DSM-V. But there is no evidence that this is going to happen. However, serious laziness and angry outbursts look as if they may make it through.

The chairman of the task force, Dr David Kupfer, claims the updates are firmly based on scientific evidence. However, while scientists have made huge strides in understanding the brain’s workings using scans, DSM-V will rely on descriptions of disorders because there’s not a single biological marker for them.

So while doctors predict your risk of heart disease from your cholesterol levels and blood pressure, there are no physical tests for hoarding, say.

This makes the potential-inclusion of binge eating in the new edition especially worrying, says Professor Lane. ‘Research into its causes has so far been inconclusive and highly speculative, so I’m very disturbed about this proposal.’

Dr David Haslam, of the National Obesity Forum, disagrees. ‘This is a serious problem that affects as many as 20 per cent of obese patients,’ he says. ‘But treating it in the same way with advice to lose weight, exercise and even to have surgery can be disastrous unless the emotional problems are dealt with.’

But what’s really causing the fur to fly is the proposal that the new manual should include ‘risk syndromes’ - symptoms that some psychiatrists believe act as an earlywarning sign of serious mental health problems in the future. These risk syndromes could be used to start treatment early.

However, critics have pointed out that 70 per cent of children said in the past to be at high risk of developing psychosis have not done so.

‘I completely understand the idea of trying to catch someone early,’ says Dr Michael First, professor of psychiatry at Columbia University, who edited the previous edition of DSM.

‘But there is a huge potential for many unusual kids to fall under this umbrella and carry this label for the rest of their lives.

‘The more disorders you put in the DSM, the more people get labels and the higher the risk that they will get inappropriate treatment.’

This is a major worry, says Dr David Healy (left), of the department of psychiatry at the University of Wales.

Dr Healy is highly regarded worldwide for helping to expose the way drug companies concealed evidence about the dangers of some antidepressants. He believes the move to treat mental ‘disorders’ early is ‘likely to massively increase the number of people receiving drugs’.

‘Too many psychiatric patients are just drugged with little concern for the side effects as it is,’ he says.

Indeed, these side effects have made the use of drugs to treat mental health problems an increasingly sensitive topic.

Research has shown that some anti-depressants - Serotonin Selective Reuptake Inhibitors such as Seroxat - can double the risk of suicide and may be no better than a placebo for most patients.

Meanwhile, a report found that 1,800 elderly people with dementia die every year as a result of being prescribed antipsychotic tranquilisers.

The situation is slightly complicated in Britain by the fact that psychiatrists rely on both the DSM and another system called the International Statistical Classification of Diseases. However, the two overlap very closely and DSM is a major influence here.

‘We are having meetings about revising the International Statistical Classification of Diseases at the moment,’ says Professor Sue Bailey, registrar of the Royal College of Psychiatrists.

‘We are looking to see if there are risk factors, based on good science, that we can use to predict future problems.’

That doesn’t reassure the sceptics. ‘Psychiatrists love defining new disorders and creating more and more subcategories,’ says Oliver James, clinical psychologist and author. ‘But when you are faced with someone in distress, what you want to know is what is the underlying fault and how best to treat it.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/search.html?s=y&authornamef=Jerome+Burne