'oneness and the matrix' Questions

[chadwick]

Are these matrices, dimensions, the only places where we 'oneness' can divide independently and explore ?

Are the matrices and oneness mere polarities of the same design ?

Is there a super bubble that encompasses these polarities ?

What does 'oneness' do when it's unplugged from any of these matrices ?

Is the matrix we all now experience malevolent in nature, while others are not ?

Is 'oneness' the creator of the matrix or is it, as we, just the decoders ?

I'd like to know more about 'oneness' and the matrices and how they intermix. Do you have any questions ? What are your thoughts ?

[wink]

looks for a way in/out when unplugged?

[chadwick]

i'm thinking oops maybe i put this thread up in the wrong forum

[thereisonlywe]

We are not sure of what you mean. But, if you are seeking mathematical approaches to Oneness this may help you: http://torch.cs.dal.ca/~kiziltan/oneness/Recommended%20Reading/Heavy/IbnArabiSufiPhysics.pdf

Love&Peace

[chadwick]

thanks i'm trying to understand 'oneness' by the simple 5w questions and the questions that arise from those possible explantions. Anything could help. Been thinking about this for a while.

[thereisonlywe]

You are very welcome. This is a good read as well, it draws the map without going into too much detail. http://www.cs.dal.ca/~kiziltan/oneness/Recommended%20Reading/Heavy/naqshalfusus.pdf

If you are concerned about the information's validity, don't be. Muhyiddin Ibn Arabi was a Perfect Man"("Insan al kamil"). To us, his books are the best sources to study Oneness on a scientific perspective. Although his works are not easy to understand, you would agree that the truth is not something simple either.

Feel free to ask any questions you might have,
Love&Peace

[boston c danmark]

Great first question. Wish I knew the answers, and what the exactly the questions entailled but willing to 'ave a go.

Are these matrices, dimensions, the only places where we 'oneness' can divide independently and explore ?
Its hard to avoid the obvious. Along time ago mathematics considered two could be created at the same root of spacetime, argueing against independent division, as it would be a mutual action there on in. But really I got stuck with it: prefer the oneness root.
It may be that matrices + D rely on oneness to be; but, at the sametime matrices+ don't sufficiently come about because of oneness. So, no. is my open ended answer, but yes is my down to earth answer.
It may be hard when we have such only my weak global definition of 'oneness'.

Are the matrices and oneness mere polarities of the same design ?
Have you got any layman terms for me to associate with the words matrices and oneness? I guess oneness roots to a beginning point, and the matrices come out of the root. Yet one is the same as the matrices, it looks at itself in the mirror and yet is only the mirror... does that make sense. Polarities? yer, as it is mimicked in reality so much, I guess this would be obvious...

Is there a super bubble that encompasses these polarities ?
Definitely, called 'you' in that global, everyday, usage of the personal reference. Point often lost in innuendo, but I like it. Still, dont think I answered the question because I am stuck on seeing how the polarities exist. Mirror, face, "you looking at me?" ok, may be i got it - 42! ok, bad joke. Ummm. If 1D starts off, 2D follows, with a distance across. then in this visual aspect I am taking, then the bubble is what? Securing the elements within... Sure, because the 2D is poles for all and any points, yet 3D is the depth. So the mirror has depth because it is held within the bubble... you lost? I am.

What does 'oneness' do when it's unplugged from any of these matrices ?
I would say, become a "Void"; but thats because I hold the idea, "oneness has nothing to do if it just is oneness". Where oneness becomes another: It isnt just one. (thinking... It is one = one +- X = one +- X +- X +- X, etc.)

Is the matrix we all now experience malevolent in nature, while others are not ?
Good Q. May be, it is a point of who are we to concieve this place... cant find the right words.

Is 'oneness' the creator of the matrix or is it, as we, just the decoders ?
In defining the largest, smallest word possible; have to believe oneness sets up the matrix... ummm

I'd like to know more about 'oneness' and the matrices and how they intermix. Do you have any questions ? What are your thoughts ?
Me too. What to read hey?

Have you come across Hofstadter Douglas Hofstadter - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia and his "law" which is very interesting. There is a layman prologue in this book, I Am a Strange Loop - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia which you might enjoy alongside the use of "I" as a oneness term - especially when you consider what he is referring to when he discusses it... the loop.
Icke has specific definitions for 'the mind' 'consciousness' & 'the bridge', which are rather intriguing.

PM me to say hi.