PDA

View Full Version : "Artistic Genius" or Just Crap?


jagalman
22-09-2007, 10:38 PM
Do you like the paintings of Picasso?

Do you like “modern art”?

If not, you are either an idiot or an anti-Semite.

You already know that most music producers and movie producers are Jewish, and that Jews pretty much own the publishing industry.

Painting and sculpture are no different.

In large American cities, most of the top art dealers tend to be Jewish. (Calm down. I didn't say ALL top dealers. I said MOST.)

Musicians, actors, and writers have agents and producers. Painters have dealers who decide what is “art," and decide which artists get shown.

They say Picasso is good. They say Jewish artists like Marc Chagall, or Kandinsky, or Willem de Kooning, Franz Kline, and countless others are “geniuses.”

They say the meaningless scribbles of “modern art” are brilliant.

And since Jews control the publishing industry, they decide what gets mentioned in textbooks as “great art.”

What we today call “modern art” was introduced to the United States with the Armory Show in 1913 (New York City). The Armory show consisted of “art” that Jewish painter Walter Kuhn collected from various painters (mostly Jewish) in Europe.

After World War II, Jews moved the world art center to New York (1950s). At that point, painting became uglier and more meaningless than ever. Art became indistinguishable from non-art.

When I say "Jews moved it," I mean things like the Solomon Guggenheim Foundation, which supported this "art" and opened its famous museum in NYC in 1959. (A previous Guggenheim museum, known as the “Museum of Non-Objective Art,” had been opened in 1937.)

With the rise of this modern “art,” Gentiles were made to feel stupid if they didn’t see the “genius” of a Picasso, or any work that Jews and their allies claimed was “brilliant.”

And since Jews tend to be the power brokers in the art world, they are at the center of a huge art trade in which a Picasso might sell for millions.

The Guggenheim Foundation’s tentacles reach far. In July 2006, the city of Abu Dhabi, (capital of the United Arab Emirates) signed an agreement with the Guggenheim Foundation to build a 300,000 square-foot "Guggenheim Abu Dhabi" museum. A Jew, Frank Gehry, designed it, with completion expected in 2011.

In Germany the National Socialists rejected this “modern art.” They preferred ancient Greek and Roman art, which were free of Jewish toxin. They also preferred German folk art. They saw “modern art” as an act of aesthetic violence by Jews against Gentiles. Not all the “modern art” painters in Germany were Jewish, but “modern art” became widespread in the Weimar days, after Jewish bankers devastated the German people. Filth was everywhere.

(Judicial inc. has a good illustration of this Jewish filth at http://judicial-inc.biz/nuremberg_laws.htm )

The National Socialists started to remove this “art” from German museums. In July 1937 they set up a famous exhibition of 650 of these “works” in Munich, and called it an exhibition of Entartete Kunst (often translated as “degenerate art”). After four months the exhibition went on tour through eleven other cities in Germany and Austria.

Next to many paintings were labels indicating how much money a museum spent to acquire the “artwork.” In the case of paintings acquired during the post-war Weimar hyperinflation of the early 1920s, when the cost of a kilo loaf of bread reached 233 billion German marks, the prices of the paintings were astronomical.

After W W II, “modern art” was re-imposed upon Gentile culture with a vengeance. So were Jewish bankers.

Today we have people like Andres Serrano and his famous “Piss Christ,” which shows a crucifix immersed in urine.

Serrano is not Jewish, but his dealers and agents are. (What would happen if someone showed a “Piss Talmud,” or a “Piss Star of David”?)

We have people like Sarah Silverman saying, "I hope the Jews did kill Christ. I'd do it again. I'd fucking do it again in a second.”

Her audience laughs and applauds.

(You can see her say this at

Sarah Silverman Jesus Is Magic - YouTube

http://youtube.com/watch?v=2ATcainiaHg&mode=related&search=

Christians PAY to see this stuff and be insulted. What would happen if a Gentile said anything remotely similar against Ben Gurion, or Herzl, or any such figure?

We have Jews like Howard Stern spreading endless filth, which contributes to mass demoralization and emotional depression.

Some Gentile comedians like George Carlin become risque, but their routines point out absurdities in general culture. Jews like Lenny Bruce spewed filth just to be filthy.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

And so, if you do not care for “modern art,” it does not mean you are dull.

On the contrary, it means you are sharp enough not to be taken in by what is largely (and generally speaking) another Jewish assault on our senses.

sirjohnthebadji
23-09-2007, 02:27 AM
Do you like the paintings of Picasso?

Do you like “modern art”?

If not, you are either an idiot or an anti-Semite.

You already know that most music producers and movie producers are Jewish, and that Jews pretty much own the publishing industry.

Painting and sculpture are no different.

In large American cities, most of the top art dealers tend to be Jewish. (Calm down. I didn't say ALL top dealers. I said MOST.)

Musicians, actors, and writers have agents and producers. Painters have dealers who decide what is “art," and decide which artists get shown.

They say Picasso is good. They say Jewish artists like Marc Chagall, or Kandinsky, or Willem de Kooning, Franz Kline, and countless others are “geniuses.”

They say the meaningless scribbles of “modern art” are brilliant.

And since Jews control the publishing industry, they decide what gets mentioned in textbooks as “great art.”

What we today call “modern art” was introduced to the United States with the Armory Show in 1913 (New York City). The Armory show consisted of “art” that Jewish painter Walter Kuhn collected from various painters (mostly Jewish) in Europe.

After World War II, Jews moved the world art center to New York (1950s). At that point, painting became uglier and more meaningless than ever. Art became indistinguishable from non-art.

When I say "Jews moved it," I mean things like the Solomon Guggenheim Foundation, which supported this "art" and opened its famous museum in NYC in 1959. (A previous Guggenheim museum, known as the “Museum of Non-Objective Art,” had been opened in 1937.)

With the rise of this modern “art,” Gentiles were made to feel stupid if they didn’t see the “genius” of a Picasso, or any work that Jews and their allies claimed was “brilliant.”

And since Jews tend to be the power brokers in the art world, they are at the center of a huge art trade in which a Picasso might sell for millions.

The Guggenheim Foundation’s tentacles reach far. In July 2006, the city of Abu Dhabi, (capital of the United Arab Emirates) signed an agreement with the Guggenheim Foundation to build a 300,000 square-foot "Guggenheim Abu Dhabi" museum. A Jew, Frank Gehry, designed it, with completion expected in 2011.

In Germany the National Socialists rejected this “modern art.” They preferred ancient Greek and Roman art, which were free of Jewish toxin. They also preferred German folk art. They saw “modern art” as an act of aesthetic violence by Jews against Gentiles. Not all the “modern art” painters in Germany were Jewish, but “modern art” became widespread in the Weimar days, after Jewish bankers devastated the German people. Filth was everywhere.

(Judicial inc. has a good illustration of this Jewish filth at http://judicial-inc.biz/nuremberg_laws.htm )

The National Socialists started to remove this “art” from German museums. In July 1937 they set up a famous exhibition of 650 of these “works” in Munich, and called it an exhibition of Entartete Kunst (often translated as “degenerate art”). After four months the exhibition went on tour through eleven other cities in Germany and Austria.

Next to many paintings were labels indicating how much money a museum spent to acquire the “artwork.” In the case of paintings acquired during the post-war Weimar hyperinflation of the early 1920s, when the cost of a kilo loaf of bread reached 233 billion German marks, the prices of the paintings were astronomical.

After W W II, “modern art” was re-imposed upon Gentile culture with a vengeance. So were Jewish bankers.

Today we have people like Andres Serrano and his famous “Piss Christ,” which shows a crucifix immersed in urine.

Serrano is not Jewish, but his dealers and agents are. (What would happen if someone showed a “Piss Talmud,” or a “Piss Star of David”?)

We have people like Sarah Silverman saying, "I hope the Jews did kill Christ. I'd do it again. I'd fucking do it again in a second.”

Her audience laughs and applauds.

(You can see her say this at

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2ATcainiaHg

http://youtube.com/watch?v=2ATcainiaHg&mode=related&search=

Christians PAY to see this stuff and be insulted. What would happen if a Gentile said anything remotely similar against Ben Gurion, or Herzl, or any such figure?

We have Jews like Howard Stern spreading endless filth, which contributes to mass demoralization and emotional depression.

Some Gentile comedians like George Carlin become risque, but their routines point out absurdities in general culture. Jews like Lenny Bruce spewed filth just to be filthy.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

And so, if you do not care for “modern art,” it does not mean you are dull.

On the contrary, it means you are sharp enough not to be taken in by what is largely (and generally speaking) another Jewish assault on our senses.


I'm well muddled. How many syllables has a haiku? Is it seventeen? Like


DREAM AS IF
YOU'LL LIVE FOREVER,
LIVE AS IF YOU'LL
DIE TODAY! THE
CHOICE

snoopsnuffleopagus
23-09-2007, 03:31 AM
Cordial Felicitations! Jagalman:

A very thought provoking Post.

Joos, Schmoos; Oi Vey!

99.9% of Humans do not accurately 'Know' what a Jew is. How the Jew relates accurately to the Book of Yahweh.

So generally, more Heat, than Light, will be the result of these 'opinings'.

Just my informed opinion. :)

Bethoven Opined".....Ars Longa, Vita Brevis", Art is Long, Life is Short. What is Good, truly good will withstand the ravishes of time, and the wanton hand of man.

I love Art, I am an Artist. I believe every Human is an Artist. Your Artistic expression is Revelatory.

In the 80s, I was on a 'Job',(construction) at the Brooklyn Museum, installing Skylights and Copper Roofing.

Every morning I would head up to the roof, passing through a Fifth Floor Gallery, chockful of Pablos Masterpieces. One Sculpture, about 5' High, made of Metal, was so ridiculous, if I put it on the average persons lawn or property, the offended person would make threats of calling the Police. They would be telling me to take the garbage off their lawn.

Other Pieces, Guernica, the Guitarist, the Blue Period.were wonderful, Brilliant, inspired.

Pablo was a 'Scamp', he purposely left no Will, so everyone would fight. He had not sold any paintings for years, collecting them himself.

Personal Discernment asto what 'Floats your Boat',

The Art World is manipulated, like all other aspects of contemporary Life, but, 'Cream will always rise'.

Kind Regards: Snoopsnuffleopagus

Addendum: Asia Times Online, great website, great writers. Otto Spengler: Great commentator: Did a great piece on contemporary Art. Hilarious.
found@Recent Spengler archives atimesonline.

pilgrim
23-09-2007, 03:48 PM
The ABC's of DADA (1 of 3) - YouTube

herebynightfall
23-09-2007, 07:53 PM
http://youtube.com/watch?v=2kYXTkoZyrw

synergy777
23-09-2007, 07:58 PM
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=7432&highlight=battle+artist

i think art is in the eye of beholder, its relative to the viewer. this forced classification, defeats the whole object of personal expression and perception.

only the other day, friday, i was looking at jackson pollack, abstract art, its wonderful. its chaos in perfect symphony.

phoebe
23-09-2007, 08:04 PM
http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=7432&highlight=battle+artist

i think art is in the eye of beholder, its relative to the viewer. this forced classification, defeats the whole object of personal expression and perception.

only the other day, friday, i was looking at jackson pollack, abstract art, its wonderful. its chaos in perfect symphony.

Yes.
Art is the creation of something.
Whether it's beautiful or not
Is totally subjective.

(btw I just looked into
My Crystal Ball and I foretell
This thread being moved to the rant room
And labelled as 'racist'.)

phoebe
25-09-2007, 02:37 PM
Looks like I was half right.

sirjohnthebadji
26-09-2007, 12:47 AM
That Dada stuff was good. Oh well, how about





















THIS IS
ART




















IS THIS
ART