Habeus Corpus for Pleasuredome

[girlgye]

Writ Habeas Corpus
Let it be that no Judge, gaoler or other officer may pretend ignorance of the import of such writ
Equality of the law is paramount

A contract founded on a base and unlawful consideration, or against good morals, is null.

What I approve I cannot reject, I cannot approve and reject at the same time, I cannot take the benefit of an instrument, and at the same time repudiate it.

Every consent involves a submission, but a mere submission does not necessarily involve a consent

Judicial Notice

Richard

Comes now the man Richard (middle name anyone?) being a living flesh and blood soul who may be bound by none without consent, serves a writ of Habeus Corpus in common law to

That his property is now lawfully returned to him and his body is released from bondage and tyranny or that his accuser (name of Judge) steps forth and displays to all the Authority that they may have over another living soul

GENESIS 1:26
Then God said “Let us make man in our image, in our likeness and let them rule over the fish of the sea and the birds of the air, over the livestock, over all the earth, and over all the creatures that move along the ground”

ROMANS 1:28-32
And even as they did not like to retain God in their knowledge, God gave them over to a reprobate mind, to do those things which are not convenient; being filled with all unrighteousness, wickedness, maliciousness; full of murder, debate, deceit, malignity; whisperers, haters of God, despiteful, proud, boasters, inventors of evil things, disobedient to parents. Without understanding, covenant breakers without natural, implacable, unmerciful

SECURITY AGREEMENT

This security agreement acknowledges the fact that all rightfully owned property in the Trust of RICHARD HARRISON (or any derivatives thereof) hereby is enacted that it is in fact a holding of the living flesh and blood man commonly and affectionately known as Rich, let any come forth who dare to rebut this security agreement made between RICHARD HARRISON (or any derivative therefore) and the living soul , Sovereign, child of God Rich.
LET HIS ACCUSERS STAND FORTH AND DEMONSTRATE

THAT, COURT SERVICES, Attorney General and Magistrates Courts, the private men (“RESPONDENT(s)”) have failed to complete an investigation from all parties

THAT, Statutes are man's law and apply to their respective corporate entities
That a signed affidavit sworn and correct by his accuser is in the possession of his captors
THAT, any person interfering with a private contract or private agreement is imposing their will upon another party or parties

Well no one stepped forward to hand out a Habeus Corpus to a judge Rich. Sorry mate. I tried.

Anyway here is the second part of what I should have drafted which may help you re your car.

Being teh only living soul who can lawfully make the highest claim of the RICHARD HARRISON TRUST do appoint (person who is doing the litigation) to act as manager for the RICHARD HARRISON TRUST and probate it as is written in law in this case.

That any and all bonds, be they bid bonds, performance bonds or payment bonds or any, and with all interests accrued to them now be released to the living flesh and blood woman, commonly known as Rich who waks upon the land recognises teh authority of FICTION NOT.

Be that is it may, that the court shall foolishly ignore the habeus corpus ad subjiciendum at common law as per article 39 of the Magna Carta, then let the judge hold in his hands a

PETITION OF RIGHT

Whereby it shall be recognised that there are no injured parties, there is no contract established and that only one who consent may be bound by a law of man. Even NAZI soliders were not exonerated of their excuse 'that they were only following orders'.

A man has been wronged upon his private land, he has had his chattels stolen by robbers, kidnapped, tortured by an army. The Under-Sherrif shall be alerted when the man bearing the God fearing and good name of Rich is not released from his bondage as all what has taken place lies far and beyond the call of duty of mere arbitration. His goods and identities stolen from him shall be returned to him, henceforth, forthwith, immediately and directly, without delay. All compensations shall be requested from him and an apology shall be written to him into the public domain for all to see.

Very truly yours



Rich


Witness
Witness
Witness

I have had no freeman step forward and comment on this habeus corpus off this forum except Mark who said he might be able to do it and I can't get hold of him now as I have changed it somewhat in relation to what a friend said regarding the last draft. Neither has anyone stepped forward to go to their local court to take it before a judge at no cost to them except their time.

Any way rich had you have not been getting out next week I'd have paid for a process server to take it myself. I would but they are playing silly buggers and they are licking their chops now to get me down the same route as you. I've had 4 fines amazingly transferred to Liverpool County court (when previously they refused all attmepts to let my trials be transferred there) So that now makes it difficult for me to execute the lien doesn't it which is due to be served for judgement today.

If you think your hapless return the letters to sender are going to get you anywhere Richard I give up. I really do this country has no future.

Still I have a plan....

[girlgye]

Oh and Rich

I have a set of very good C.A's that will suffice to keep them off your back. I hope you listen to someone who has actually walked the talk in regard to what you are going through.

I can assure you sending unopened mail back did not work for me. I had to apply

1. Common Law focusing on Tort, False Imprisonment and Tresspass, Writ Replevin, Writ Habeus Corpus, Writ Certiorari
2. contract Law
3. Admiralty Law
4. Commercial Law

The came in that order to the masses and those in the know so suggest you follow your knowledge in that order. That is if you aint' to wiped out by it all.

My prayers have been wiv ya buddy.

PIP PIP.

[freeman craig]

you know where i live so im too far away plus im not qualified enough in law to know what im doing (i've not done enough study yet). if i can help in any way then i will just let us know

[girlgye]

yeah right now anyone can do it anywhere but you would have to have some idea of what it is about yes. He's out next Thursday so it looks as though he was given a convicted sentence. I've put it here should it happen to him or someone else again and I will help to organise a conference in order to get out of this lethargic mindset people seem to be in.

He will be re-sentenced if he doesn't get his paper work sorted. they crushed my mates car. Platform 7 of this board. With refused for cause return to sender posts. Now lets see whether they crushed mine with all my paper work and lien threats if they did then I am serving one on the car pound Director too been too busy staving off all the flea type bites i've been getting for fines surrounding the car. 1. driving over some chevrons. 3 pts £180. 2.Driving 6 miles over the limit and not answering a NIP 6 points.£615 A parked car without insurance I believe they have banned me in absentia with no proof of the body and no signature so go figure that out. Still all pending cases folks. Writs have been served upon the robbers. DVLA, POLICE, COURT. These are all at estoppel and Liens need to be served. Though my guess is the police have said oh pluuuuuurse let Merseyside Court handle her affairs we'll do it. Unfortunately Merseyside Court are third party interlopers just like any others and they will need to show me their licence to collect fiefs and other chattels as well as some proof of id. Oh and yes with the batch of mail came an unsigned pass on to Merseyside Collections office from no other than United Utilities from the Bulk Clearing Centre in Northampton with no forwarding judiciary with which to address my claim. FRAUD? I say...


In fact...I'm trying to think of one situation where RFCRTS has worked and I have about 20 things going and as you can imagine for someone this swamped it's an attractive proposition. It has not worked for one. Even the traffic tickets. Though Rich that lovely Notice you sent me when you were wild eyed and eager as a TIGER for this - works a treat - EVER time.

Unfortunately the law expects an explanation better than a terse comment on an envelope.
Oh and as for 'LAWFUL REBELLION'. Tried in the States 13,000 swamped US treasury the lot were binned. Those who took the high road got there.
As I have demonstrated on success threads.

[girlgye]

[Chapter 28: No constable or other bailiff of ours shall take anyone’s corn or other chattels [property] unless he pays on the spot in cash for them . ]

Magna Carta 1215, 1225, 1297 drafts.

Chapter 39: No free man shall be arrested or imprisoned or disseised or outlawed or exiled or any way victimized, neither will we attack him or send anyone to attack him, except by the lawful judgment of his peers [in other words] by the law of [from] the land. Chapter 40: To no one will we sell, to no one will we refuse or delay right or justice

[politicallycorrect]

I think you might find that the Magna Carta was intended for the 'freemen'... i.e. the barons, early and those of privelidge not for the common man.

[girlgye]

I am a Sovereign

[asky]

I am a Sovereign
Thats your opinion it isnt true

asky

[merlincove]

Thats your opinion it isnt true

asky

that's your opinion, and it very well may not be true ;)

[asky]

OH NO!

I better watch my step the moderator badge is back:D

asky

[girlgye]

P.S in commerce there are exceptions choose whether you are going to take your remedy in the private or public. In the latter you will be in an admiralty court until you force the judge to turn it to common law court check the Antiterrorist vid in court and others that are on Rich's resource thread and the other resource thread in the sticky section.

Oh I've been refusing for cause some letters which is the correct legal thing to do from an interloper this is after I sent a legal notice having been told by the interoloper that I had no basis in law to argue the fact that they had a right to steal my car and the pound had right to crush it.
So I sent a stinker back.

Always a Fri/Sat I got a letter back from the court from the courts most senior judge (pretend judgy wudgdy) Deputy Clerk to Magistrates.
Thank you for your letter there is nothing more I can suggest. This is in responde to a Commercial Oath all due process and a Negative Averment.

The Police interloper 'thank you for your letter (it was a stiff notice lemme tell ya') it was totally illogical. hehehehehehehehhehehehe

:D Yup these people send people to prison daily and they don't know what a Negative Averment is or even a Notice.

Amazing innit? You can't make this stuff up.
You really can't.
Does it remind you of a certain type of poster by any chance ;) Really Deputy Chief Clerk and Police Interloper you really ought not be taking your advice off a troll on David Icke. Though I'm sure David Icke himself will be imensely proud of what Sean and the team have achieved!!!!!
Well done you guys!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[malvern]

Amazing innit? You can't make this stuff up.
You really can't.
Does it remind you of a certain type of poster by any chance Really Deputy Chief Clerk and Police Interloper you really ought not be taking your advice off a troll on David Icke. Though I'm sure David Icke himself will be imensely proud of what Sean and the team have achieved!!!!!
Well done you guys!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!



the sad thing is that they do ............


freedom is the grandchildren we are the caretakers

[karl j]

Did the Habeus Corpus get served to allow for Richards early release...?

[girlgye]

Nope. So the solution is to start meetings again to get some unity and integrity back together and be unequivocal about asking trouble causers to leave.

See it was done for me as we did the same and he didn't know how to right one at the time he just went in to the judge and pleaded. I don't doubt that the recent penchance for banging people up is what is making people worldwide stay out of courts right now but united we stand.

I think from PD's letter that he saw the error but I was hoping all hope that he could turn the judge from Admiralty but I don't think he understood that at the time and probably got bamboozeled into the usually trickery they play.
In an admiralty court they would be perfectly entitled to rule in favour of the defendent as you would know Karl.

Though if you know otherwise pray tell. :)
Although our team is wrecked sorry PD due to one of the best researchers we'll ever find doing NCRTS on his mortgage debt.

Not a good idea.

[wakeupworld]

I have said before that meetings are the way forward, maybe where possible at local level. Hell of a lot of time wasting here going round in circles.

[girlgye]

Listen I went to Amits, and Michael's meetings in Derby 5 hour drive away and I still have the friends who live 200 miles away from to this day. I wouldn't be without them. No one said freedom wouldn't come at a price. If there is a meet happening may I respectfully suggest you do all you can to get there.

[debishop]

I have said before that meetings are the way forward, maybe where possible at local level. Hell of a lot of time wasting here going round in circles.

Sound words. I have deliberately kept quiet on this forum for two reasons:-

1. I saw that I had to gain more information.
2. It is a waste of time talking in a forum environment. I have not been able to get help with my dire circumstances.

Meeting face to face lets others see one is not a troll, at least I have those skills. My only disagreement would be that at an early stage, meetings may have to be wider than local until growth is achieved.

DB

[wakeupworld]

debishop........Thanks, yes has to be be so positive meeting people face to face and learning from each other.

girlgye.........My point was nothing to do with laziness or freedom coming at a price. I stated that local meetings were the way forward and appreciate that people do indeed travel a long way to go to various meetings.

I don`t know everyones personal circumstances but it`s very likely that not everyone is in a position to afford to travel hundreds of miles to go to a meeting.

To use that awful MLM jargon the information learnt and shared experiences/ success stories etc needs to be networked.

[debishop]

@wakeupworld

"To use that awful MLM jargon the information learnt and shared experiences/ success stories etc needs to be networked."

Agreed, just one addition...information on failures can be equally important.

DB

[mark1963]

Why not use current technology and videolink?

[girlgye]

yes all the nottingham conferences and derby conferences are up there. You can't beat the meetings of the heart. They usually film the speakers and not what is going on the ground.

Ok then start local meet. Just start in a local pub or cafe. Doesn't matter how much each of you know. Just make a start. It only takes two or three to start it.

[wakeupworld]

Why not use current technology and videolink?

Instead of or as well? For those that want that, why not? I`d prefer actual physical meetings and personally any more time spent on a computer is not something that I`d choose.

[girlgye]

yes I can't bear being around these armchair thugs much longer. As well as thin veneer of disnformation disguised as research.

[edelweiss pirate]

I think you might find that the Magna Carta was intended for the 'freemen'... i.e. the barons, early and those of privelidge not for the common man.

True. The town I come from has a road called Freeman street which refers to the people who had been granted freedom of the town by a livery company (ie masonic guild).

[iaintoff]

wow

reading this thread is enough to scare any "newbie" off becoming/considering FMOTL...

lots of arrogancy there from lots of senior members, is it any wonder that the movement is not gaining ground as quickly as it should be when we have gatekeepers like you lot at the entrance...

you guys really need to address your attitude/contempt for others, otherwise you just end up being like the elist NWO scum...

...please :)sort it out...

[tien an]

wow

reading this thread is enough to scare any "newbie" off becoming/considering FMOTL...

lots of arrogancy there from lots of senior members, is it any wonder that the movement is not gaining ground as quickly as it should be when we have gatekeepers like you lot at the entrance...

you guys really need to address your attitude/contempt for others, otherwise you just end up being like the elist NWO scum...

...please :)sort it out...

I hear you...but can't you see the above post is trolling?

What would you say to someone who insists black is white?
"OK, black is white..."

(good advertisement):rolleyes:

Or just give up and let it happen? (which is how we all got here in the first place).

tian an.

[merlincove]

Due to 5045

A number of posts have been deleted, as being off topic and a number of posts moved to this (http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=102564) thread.

Back on track, please: Habeus Corpus for Pleasuredome :D

[girlgye]

heheheheheheheheheheheheheheh.
Your'e too kind even sending their stuff to the shit tip. :D :D :D

[edelweiss pirate]

heheheheheheheheheheheheheheh.
Your'e too kind even sending their stuff to the shit tip. :D :D :D

Another typically informative and enlightened post.

Do you remember me saying that I was willing to leave you guys alone and get on with it.

That was until I saw your endless baiting and rumbling for argument.

So as long as you continue to seek attention I shall give you the attention you so crave.

[hadabusa]

I have said before that meetings are the way forward, maybe where possible at local level. Hell of a lot of time wasting here going round in circles.

atleast heres scepticts.
meetings where every1s patting eachothers shoulder saying "yesyes" wont help the case much.

if theres no secrets, everything can be debatted here.

just saying.

[asky]

Why is this thread a sticky?
Isnt Pleasuredome free?

asky

[platform7]

Why is this thread a sticky?
Isnt Pleasuredome free?

asky

IMHO I think none of us are as PERSONS and it depends on your reasoning/definition of free

you accuse someone of being a nutter and your free to do that without any evidence you are also free to apologise care to do that?

[bones]

IMHO I think none of us are as PERSONS and it depends on your reasoning/definition of free

you accuse someone of being a nutter and your free to do that without any evidence you are also free to apologise care to do that?

asky is unable to reply!!!

COS HES BANNED FOR TROLLING...

[platform7]

asky is unable to reply!!!

COS HES BANNED FOR TROLLING...

Thanks Bones I did not realise that and to be fair I do not want to see him or number_6 banned as I am all for free speech and reasoned debate ;) and I wish both of them peace, love and goodwill

Anyway keeping to the original topic I hope pleasuredome is safe, well and enjoying life again. He is from Leicester way? I admire him as he has certainly stuck his neck out like girlgye whom I have met and also admire.

As for you Bones--I also wish you and your family peace, love and goodwill--:) thanks again regards Platform7

[rumpole]

It was a misconceived idea in any case - District Judges or Circuit Judges sitting in the County Court have no jurisdiction to hear writs of Habeas Corpus.

[boots]

It was a misconceived idea in any case - District Judges or Circuit Judges sitting in the County Court have no jurisdiction to hear writs of Habeas Corpus.


Was habeus corpus repealed?

.

[rumpole]

Was habeus corpus repealed?

.


No but only senior Judges have the jurisdiction to deal with Habeas Corpus applications.

[boots]

No but only senior Judges have the jurisdiction to deal with Habeas Corpus applications.



A hapeus corpus is issued from a higher court to a lower court the HC has to be taken to a Supreme court to be issued and has jurisdiction over the lower courts.


Your omission of this basic fact tells me you have an arrogant attitude to anyone who looks into and wants to be a fmotl or to learn these principals and aply them to the current dictatorial system.


.

[rumpole]

A hapeus corpus is issued from a higher court to a lower court the HC has to be taken to a Supreme court to be issued and has jurisdiction over the lower courts.


Your omission of this basic fact tells me you have an arrogant attitude to anyone who looks into and wants to be a fmotl or to learn these principals and aply them to the current dictatorial system.


.


Rubbish.

Here in England & Wales we have to do Habeas Corpus in a specific way. I don't know how it's done in Australia & frankly I don't care. It really isn't relevant to the matter at hand.

http://www.justice.gov.uk/civil/procrules_fin/contents/schedule1/rscorder54.htm

Anything else I can 'help' you with?

[girlgye]

It was a misconceived idea in any case - District Judges or Circuit Judges sitting in the County Court have no jurisdiction to hear writs of Habeas Corpus.

And if you read the thread you will see it says this most go to the Queens Bench.

[girlgye]

Rubbish.

Here in England & Wales we have to do Habeas Corpus in a specific way. I don't know how it's done in Australia & frankly I don't care. It really isn't relevant to the matter at hand.

http://www.justice.gov.uk/civil/procrules_fin/contents/schedule1/rscorder54.htm

Anything else I can 'help' you with?

We will use the way that is mandated in the common law writ of screas. Not your way. Any other way is phoney baloney and needs the consent of the governed and well you know it but yet you continue to sit here and philibuster into making us believe it is all true and we MUST FOLLOW YOUR WAY.

I wouldn't start coming here to disinform us. Especially as you claim not to have a law degree. You wouldn't want us to think you were a first rate liar would you?

[rumpole]

We will use the way that is mandated in the common law writ of screas. Not your way. Any other way is phoney baloney and needs the consent of the governed and well you know it but yet you continue to sit here and philibuster into making us believe it is all true and we MUST FOLLOW YOUR WAY.

I wouldn't start coming here to disinform us. Especially as you claim not to have a law degree. You wouldn't want us to think you were a first rate liar would you?

What is the point of bombarding Judges with applications that they don't have jurisdiction to deal with? if you'd followed the procedure set out in RSC 54 you'd have got a hearing in front of a Judge. Isn't that what you wanted?

I repeat I don't have a Law Degree. I read Ancient History at University.

[girlgye]

There's 2 forms of remedy
Redemption - Using their laws against them
FMOL - Use of the common law.

This is a common law remedy. Hope that helps.

As I stated and have stated all through this thread. A member of the Queens Bench has express authority to release a body where it has been unlawfully snatched. I'm not going to let it wash either that Richard went voluntarily. They came like they did with me in thuggish form and gave him no alternative. On the other hand I was willing to be shot dead. They were not taking me. End of. That was clearly not Richard's approach in front of his worried parents. It is still unlawful kidnapping of a body.

I know how to get remedy and gave those instructions to whomsoever took it in clear as day.

To use the former would not be the correct remedy there are clear procedures about the set out of such a remedy.

A common law HC can be 1 sentence or it can be like was written here. It was expressly mandated to the Sherrif and ulitmately he/she would have been holding the baby had they not released him.

Not one man/woman took it upon themselves to use that. I'm sure they will have some sort of excuse for doing so.

The sort of excuses I'm hearing in regards to people going to support Robert Green for election no doubt.

So don't worry Rumpole. There is no revolution happening here I can assure you.

[girlgye]

What is the point of bombarding Judges with applications that they don't have jurisdiction to deal with? if you'd followed the procedure set out in RSC 54 you'd have got a hearing in front of a Judge. Isn't that what you wanted?

I repeat I don't have a Law Degree. I read Ancient History at University.

Well that was helpful research rumpole for someone who wishes to use remdemptive methods which I'm sure they can easily see themselves by going to the CP site.

Thank you for your contribution to the study and application of law here. Keep that up and I'm sure we will be great mates even if we have opposing views. :)

Afterall Dreamweaver is a stout skeptic but he is still my mate.