The Federal Reserve and Goldman Sachs grilled

[bowtiedaddy]

How many people on here watched the hearings?

http://www.c-span.org/Watch/Media/2010/01/27/HP/R/28944/Key+players+in+2008+government+Bailout+of+AIG+to+t estify.aspx

Beyond the utter brilliance of what is unfolding, if you watch the third video, go to about 31 minutes into the broadcast. . . Is she saying that the Fed or Goldman Sachs is threatening Nuclear weapons? Seriously... take a listen.

[the apprentice]

How many people on here watched the hearings?

http://www.c-span.org/Watch/Media/2010/01/27/HP/R/28944/Key+players+in+2008+government+Bailout+of+AIG+to+t estify.aspx

Beyond the utter brilliance of what is unfolding, if you watch the third video, go to about 31 minutes into the broadcast. . . Is she saying that the Fed or Goldman Sachs is threatening Nuclear weapons? Seriously... take a listen.

Have you got a direct link BTD.

[wakeuptime]

I want to see Geithner testify. This clip seems to be after he left.

[motleyhoo]

How many people on here watched the hearings?

http://www.c-span.org/Watch/Media/2010/01/27/HP/R/28944/Key+players+in+2008+government+Bailout+of+AIG+to+t estify.aspx

Beyond the utter brilliance of what is unfolding, if you watch the third video, go to about 31 minutes into the broadcast. . . Is she saying that the Fed or Goldman Sachs is threatening Nuclear weapons? Seriously... take a listen.

What she is saying is that someone calling in something as outlandish as a nuclear bomb threat is not credible. She's not saying someone threatened a nuclear bomb. This is pertaining to the Feds in 2008 threatening that if the govt didn't force the taxpayers to bail out AIG the entire economy would implode (doomsday). She trying to get one of those jackasses to admit that they exaggerated (ie, lied).

.

[firstlook]

Government is useless right now.

[fidokrab]

I wonder how much longer the fed will last?

[rodin]

I wonder how much longer the fed will last?

Its outlived its usefulness to them - almost

WWIII maybe to complete the set then New World Bank just as commies said we would have

[mizz420]

Why are they all chewing gum in court?

[icarus]

Why are they all chewing gum in court?

chewing the cud, like cattle

[icarus]

The House Oversight Cmte. held a hearing today looking at the 2008 bailout of AIG by the Government. Witnesses included Fmr. Treasury Sec. Henry Paulson, Treasury Sec. Timothy Geithner, TARP Inspector Gen. Neil Barofsky and AIG's ex-CFO Elias Habayeb.

three of these guys sound similar

i like the way the chaiman stops as some guy whispers in her ear, "we have your kids, bitch, be nice or they're ice"

probably

[bowtiedaddy]

What she is saying is that someone calling in something as outlandish as a nuclear bomb threat is not credible. She's not saying someone threatened a nuclear bomb. This is pertaining to the Feds in 2008 threatening that if the govt didn't force the taxpayers to bail out AIG the entire economy would implode (doomsday). She trying to get one of those jackasses to admit that they exaggerated (ie, lied).

.

Just wanted to make sure and see what other people thought. I could sense a LOT of tension in the third panel, in contrast to the first two. Also... it was a bit odd how panicked Paulson was when he left. I did read a year ago that Goldman Sachs had the possession of a nuclear weapon in a mainstream newspaper (I think it was the New York Times, but I could be mistaken) . . . so that's why that statement seemed a little interesting. At any rate, the tension in that particular panel was so thick you could cut it with a knife. The congressional panel, for some reason seemed a little frightened in comparison to the first two...thus my suspicion.

[the apprentice]

Just wanted to make sure and see what other people thought. I could sense a LOT of tension in the third panel, in contrast to the first two. Also... it was a bit odd how panicked Paulson was when he left. I did read a year ago that Goldman Sachs had the possession of a nuclear weapon in a mainstream newspaper (I think it was the New York Times, but I could be mistaken) . . . so that's why that statement seemed a little interesting. At any rate, the tension in that particular panel was so thick you could cut it with a knife. The congressional panel, for some reason seemed a little frightened in comparison to the first two...thus my suspicion.

Could this be the false flag opp to come next then maybe, I'm mean the next one is always way better than the one before it.

What happens when another president is killed, how do those people feel about their leaders knowing that slight of hand and foul play is in the room.

[uksecretcourts]

Just wanted to make sure and see what other people thought. I could sense a LOT of tension in the third panel, in contrast to the first two. Also... it was a bit odd how panicked Paulson was when he left. I did read a year ago that Goldman Sachs had the possession of a nuclear weapon in a mainstream newspaper (I think it was the New York Times, but I could be mistaken) . . . so that's why that statement seemed a little interesting. At any rate, the tension in that particular panel was so thick you could cut it with a knife. The congressional panel, for some reason seemed a little frightened in comparison to the first two...thus my suspicion.

I'd like to see Paulson panicking.

Goldman sacks employees have been buying guns and armoury from what I understand.
For the 2010 bonuses they warned staff not to "buy flashy items".

Thomas Jefferson and co always warned about "central banks", and such warnings are more relevant to our era, than perhaps at anytime since 1776.
GS will have sensed this seachange in mood.

So expect some fast moves to get the people on side. Smoke and mirrors, is what I'd be looking for right now.
however with people like Celente ridiculing the FED's management, all the smoke in the world can't hide massive unemployment queues, poverty and zero pension funds.

I can't see how the FED is going to get itself out of this mess - but we the taxpayers are innocent in all this. And just like the population of Iceland is having a referendum to "NOT PAY" the debt of private banks, I think the rest of us should follow Iceland. We're innocent. The banks pay for their mistakes, not generations of taxpayers - for the next 3 generations. It's just my point of view, but why should we be improvished, and the banks are already back in massive profit land.